D-E冲突类型和时间压力对风险决策的影响
The Effect of Time Pressure on Experience Decision Incorporating Conflicting Descriptions
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2020.109160, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 程塨渌:天津师范大学心理学部,天津;陈世平, 王晓庄*:天津师范大学心理学部,天津;教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地,天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,天津;学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室,天津
关键词: 风险决策D-E冲突时间压力Risky Decision Description-Experience Confliction Time Pressure
摘要: 当来自外部的描述性信息(Description Information)与来自个体内在的经验信息(Experience Information)不一致时,即D-E冲突(Description-Experience Confliction)情境,对风险决策有显著影响。本研究进一步细化D-E冲突类型,考察获益条件下D风险大于E风险(个体经验的风险收益低于外部描述的风险收益,即风险不利冲突)、D风险小于E风险(个体经验的风险收益高于外部描述的风险收益,即风险有利冲突)情境对风险选择的影响,同时,检验时间压力在决策中的作用。采用2 (时间压力:无时间压力、时间压力) × 2 (D-E冲突类型:D > E风险不利、D < E风险有利)被试间设计,抽取125名被试,比较被试在不同D-E冲突类型情境中选择风险选项的比例。结果发现:1) 在D-E冲突的风险决策中,经验信息的影响大于描述性信息的影响。2) 在风险有利的D-E冲突情境中,时间压力会降低被试的风险偏好。本研究深化了对D-E冲突影响风险选择的规律性的认识。
Abstract: Previous studies demonstrated that decision makers are influenced by the situation in which description conflicts with experience. The situation is namely D-E confliction. According to sensitivity of expected value, we examine two types of confliction whose subjects exposed to description and experiences simultaneously make decision when risky choice was advantageous or disadvantageous. When risky choice was advantageous, subjects judged risky choice was better than safe choice from experience, although description supported safe choice (D < E). When risky choice was disadvantageous, subjects judged safe choice was better than risky choice from experience information, although description supported risky choice (D > E). Moreover, external factors are also important in risky decision. Time pressure, as an external factor, makes strong influence on decision makers. Thus we also observe the influence of time pressure in D-E confliction. We recruited 125 participants and employed 2 × 2 between-subject design: two levels of time pressure (presence of time pressure or absence of time pressure) and two types of D-E confliction (D > E or D < E) for purpose of observing participants’ choice for the risk option in different treatment. Our result provides evidence supporting previous studies that decision makers believed their experiences more than descriptions. Secondly, our result suggests that participants under time pressure chose risky options less than participants without time pressure when risky choice was advantageous.
文章引用:程塨渌, 陈世平, 王晓庄 (2020). D-E冲突类型和时间压力对风险决策的影响. 心理学进展, 10(9), 1363-1374. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2020.109160

参考文献

[1] 侯钰莹, 陈世平, 孟四清(2019). 收益和损失情境中D-E冲突的反射效应和习得速度. 心理与行为研究, 17(2), 268-273.
[2] 李彬, 徐富明, 王伟, 张慧, 罗寒冰(2014). 损失规避的产生根源. 心理科学进展, 22(8), 1319-1327.
[3] 钟毅平, 张文洁, 李亚蕾, 范伟(2018). 时间压力对错误记忆的影响: 情绪的调节作用. 心理学报, 50(9), 5-15.
[4] Barron, G., & Erev, I. (2003). Small Feedback-Based Decisions and Their Limited Correspondence to Description-Based Decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 215-233.
[CrossRef
[5] Brosnan, S. F., Jones, O. D., Lambeth, S. P., Mareno, M. C., Richardson, A. S., & Schapiro, S. J. (2007). Endowment Effects in Chimpanzees. Current Biology, 17, 1704-1707.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Camilleri, A. R., & Newell, B. R. (2009). Within-Subject Preference Reversals in Description- and Experience-Based Choice. In N. Taatgen, & H. V. Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 449-454). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
[7] Camilleri, A. R., & Newell, B. R. (2011). Description- and Experience-Based Choice: Does Equivalent Information Equal Equivalent Choice? Acta Psychological, 136, 276-284.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Caraco, T., Martindale, S., & Whittam, T. S. (1980). An Empirical Demonstration of Risk-Sensitive Foraging Preferences. Animal Behavior, 28, 820-830.
[CrossRef
[9] Chen, M. K., Lakshminarayanan, V., & Santos, L. (2006). The Evolution of Our Preferences: Evidence from Capuchin Monkey Trading Behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 517-537.
[CrossRef
[10] Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The Affect Heuristic in Judgments of Risks and Benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1-17.
[CrossRef
[11] Gonzalez, C., & Dutt, V. (2011). Instance-Based Learning: Integrating Sampling and Repeated Decisions from Experience. Psychological Review, 118, 523-551.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Goodie, A. S., & Crooks, C. L. (2004). Time-Pressure Effects on Performance in a Base-Rate Task. The Journal of General Psychology, 131, 18-28.
[CrossRef
[13] Guo, L., Trueblood, J. S., & Diederich, A. (2017). Thinking Fast Increases Framing Effects in Risky Decision Making. Psychological Science, 28, 530-543.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Hadar, L., & Fox, C. R. (2009). Information Asymmetry in Decision from Description versus Decision from Experience. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 317-325.
[15] Hertwig, R., Barron, G., & Erev, W. I. (2004). Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice. Psychological Science, 15, 534-539.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Hochman, G., & Yechiam, E. (2011). Loss Aversion in the Eye and in the Heart: The Autonomic Nervous System’s Responses to Losses. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24, 140-156.
[CrossRef
[17] Hu, Y., Wang, D., Pang, K., Xu, G., & Guo, J. (2015). The Effect of Emotion and Time Pressure on Risk Decision-Making. Journal of Risk Research, 18, 637-650.
[CrossRef
[18] Huber, O., & Kunz, U. (2007). Time Pressure in Risky Decision-Making: Effect on Risk Defusing. Psychological Test & Assessment Modeling, 49, 415-426.
[19] Jasper, J. D., Bhattacharya, C., Levin, I. P., Jones, L., & Bossard, E. (2013). Numeracy as a Predictor of Adaptive Risky Decision Making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 164-173.
[CrossRef
[20] Jessup, R. K., Bishara, A. J., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2008). Feedback Produces Divergence from Prospect Theory in Descriptive Choice. Psychological Science, 19, 1015-1022.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Kahneman, D. (2003). A Perspective on Judgment and Choice: Mapping Bounded Rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720.
[CrossRef
[22] Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
[CrossRef
[23] Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1991). Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039-1061.
[CrossRef
[24] Kocher, M. G., Pahlke, J., & Trautmann, S. T. (2011). Tempus Fugit: Time Pressure in Risky Decisions. Management Science, 59, 2380-2391.
[CrossRef
[25] Konstantinidis, E., Taylor, R. T., & Newell, B. R. (2017). Magnitude and Incentives: Revisiting the Overweighting of Extreme Events in Risky Decisions from Experience. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 1925-1933.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Lejarraga, T., & Gonzalez, C. (2011). Effects of Feedback and Complexity on Repeated Decisions from Description. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 286-295.
[CrossRef
[27] Levin, I. P., Weller, J. A., Pederson, A. A., & Harshman, L. A. (2007). Age-Related Differences in Adaptive Decision Making: Sensitivity to Expected Value in Risky Choice. Judgment and Decision Making, 2, 225-233.
[28] Madan, C. R., Ludvig, E. A., & Spetch, M. L. (2014). Remembering the Best and Worst of Times: Memories for Extreme Outcomes bias Risky Decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 629-636.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Madan, C. R., Ludvig, E. A., & Spetch, M. L. (2017). The Role of Memory in Distinguishing Risky Decisions from Experience and Description. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 2048-2059.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Madan, C. R., Shafer, A. T., Chan, M., & Singhal, A. (2016). Shock and Awe: Distinct Effects of Taboo Words on Lexical Decision and Free Recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 793-810.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Madan, C. R., Spetch, M. L., & Ludvig, E. A. (2015). Rapid Makes Risky: Time Pressure Increases Risk Seeking in Decisions from Experience. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1-8.
[CrossRef
[32] Martin, G. K., & Matthias, S. (2006). Time Is Money-Time Pressure, Incentives, and the Quality of Decision-Making. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 61, 375-392.
[CrossRef
[33] Nursimulu, A. D, & Bossaerts, P. (2014). Risk and Reward Preferences under Time Pressure. Review of Finance, 18, 999-1022.
[CrossRef
[34] Saqib, N. U., & Chan, E. Y. (2015). Time Pressure Reverses Risk Preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 130, 58-68.
[CrossRef
[35] Stewart, N., Chater, N., & Brown, G. D. A. (2006). Decision by Sampling. Cognitive Psychology, 53, 1-26.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Ungemach, C., Chater, N., & Stewart, N. (2009). Are Probabilities Over-Weighted or Underweighted When Rare Outcomes Are Experience (Rarely)? Psychological Science, 20, 473-479.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Wang, L., Yu, H., & Zhou, X. (2013). Interaction between Value and Perceptual Salience in Value-Driven Attentional Capture. Journal of Vision, 13, 1-13.
[CrossRef
[38] Wegier, P., & Spaniol, J. (2015). The Effect of Time Pressure on Risky Financial Decisions from Description and Decisions from Experience. PLoS ONE, 10, e0123740.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Weiss-Cohen, L., Konstantinidis, E., Speekenbrink, M., & Harvey, N. (2018). Task Complexity Moderates the Influence of Descriptions in Decisions from Experience. Cognition, 170, 209-227.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Weiss-Cohen, L., Konstantinidis, E., Speekenbrink, M., & Harvey, N. (2016). Incorporating Conflicting Descriptions into Decisions from Experience. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 135, 55-69.
[CrossRef
[41] Wulff, D. U., Mergenthaler-Canseco, M., & Hertwig, R. (2017). A Meta-Analytic Review of Two Modes of Learning and the Description-Experience Gap. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 140-176.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Young, D. L., Goodie, A. S., Hall, D. B., & Wu, E. (2012). Decision Making under Time Pressure, Modeled in a Prospect Theory Framework. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 179-188.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Zeigenfuse, M. D., Pleskac, T. J., & Liu, T. (2014). Rapid Decisions from Experience. Cognition, 131, 181-194.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]