急性缺血性脑卒中治疗中机械取栓术的发展
Development of Mechanical Thrombectomy in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2020.109304, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 史宇兵*, 杨洪义：陕西中医药大学整合医学研究院，陕西 咸阳；董 静, 邓国荣：陕西中医药大学第二附属医院心血管科，陕西 咸阳；付 锋：陕西省核工业二一五医院神经内科，陕西 咸阳；王海芳：陕西中医药大学陕西省中西医结合心血管病防治重点实验室，陕西 咸阳
关键词: 急性缺血性脑卒中；血栓；临床治疗；机械除栓术；直接抽吸除栓术；Acute Ischemic Stroke； Thrombus； Clinical Treatment； Mechanical Thrombectomy； Direct Aspiration Thrombectomy
摘要: 血栓导致的急性缺血性卒中是一种常见而凶险的脑血管疾病。早期血管开通是其治疗中的重要环节。临床治疗该病的方法包括静脉溶栓、动脉溶栓、血管成形术和机械取栓，而机械除栓是其中最有效的方法。机械除栓术从第一代发展至第三代，大幅提高了患者的治疗效果，但是使用中还存在技术问题包括易造成次级血栓碎块脱落并堵塞下游血管。新一代直接抽吸除栓术可以有效减少次级血栓碎块，而且不涉及复杂机械结构，相比于前几代机械除栓术具有除栓效率高、安全性好、花费低等优势。假以时日，直接抽吸除栓术将发展成为急性缺血性卒中治疗的首要选择。
Abstract: Acute ischemic stroke is a common and lethal cerebrovascular disease. Early intervention is crucial to the patient treatment and recovery. Clinical treatment options for AIS include intravenous thrombolysis, intraarterial thrombolysis, angioplasty, and mechanical thrombectomy. Currently the most commonly used intervention technique is the mechanical thrombectomy. This treatment has the complication of causing thrombus fragmentation and blockage of distant smaller arteries. In recent years direct aspiration thrombectomy has been proposed as a new thrombus removing technique which can effectively avoid the thrombus fragmentation. Besides, aspiration thrombectomy involves no complex mechanical mechanism, and compared with the mechanical thrombectomy of previous generations, it is more efficient in thrombus elimination, safer, and costs less. Given time for further development, direct aspiration thrombectomy will become the first choice in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.
文章引用：史宇兵, 董静, 付锋, 杨洪义, 邓国荣, 王海芳. 急性缺血性脑卒中治疗中机械取栓术的发展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2020, 10(9): 2029-2037. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2020.109304

参考文献

[1] 高峰, 陈康宁, 张学蕾, 等. 急性缺血性脑卒中介入治疗[M]//缺血性脑血管病介入治疗进展2015. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015: 140-156.
[2] 胡盛寿, 高润霖, 刘力生, 等. 《中国心血管病报告2018》概要[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2019, 34(3): 209-220.
[3] Yeo, L.L.L. and Sharma, V.K. (2013) The Quest for Arterial Recanalization in Acute Ischemic Stroke-the Past, Present and the Future. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, 5, 251-265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Bhaskar, S., Stanwell, P., Cordato, D., et al. (2018) Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Dawn of a New Era? BMC Neurology, 18, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] 中国卒中学会, 中国卒中学会神经介入分会, 中华预防医学会卒中预防与控制专业委员会介入学组. 急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗中国指南2018 [J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2018, 13(7): 706-729.
[6] 王拥军. 脑卒中诊疗王拥军2017观点[M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 2017.
[7] 缪中荣. 缺血性脑血管病介入治疗进展2015 [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015.
[8] 蒋红燕, 郑绍成, 白菊. 缺血性脑卒中的治疗进展[J]. 医学综述, 2009, 15(18): 2771-2774.
[9] 邓丽, 刘晓冬, 张拥波, 等. 急性脑梗死的治疗进展[J]. 中国全科医学, 2011, 14(8): 825-829.
[10] 崔庆宏, 陈慧, 张拥波, 等. 急性缺血性脑卒中治疗新探索[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2011, 10(23): 1879-1881.
[11] 张强. 缺血性脑血管病的治疗现状以及进展分析[J]. 中西医结合心血管病杂志, 2018, 6(7): 41-43.
[12] 吴林. 缺血性脑卒中临床治疗研究现状与进展[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2019, 32(19): 3065-3066.
[13] 马蓉, 徐弘扬, 杨锡彤, 等. 急性脑卒中治疗的研究进展[J]. 重庆医学, 2019, 48(6): 1010-1013+ 017.
[14] 陈康宁. 急性缺血性脑卒中治疗的新曙光——机械取栓治疗[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2013, 35(24): 2610-2613.
[15] Maingard, J., Foo, M., Chandra, R.V., et al. (2019) Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 21, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 陈左权, 张鸿祺, 高亮, 等. 神经介入技术[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2017.
[17] 周华东. 缺血性脑血管病介入治疗进展[J]. 解放军医药杂志, 2014, 26(3): 35-37.
[18] 曾敏, 龚细礼. 急性缺血性脑血管病血管内介入治疗进展[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2017, 33(2): 243-245.
[19] Latchaw, R.E. (2007) Mechanical Thrombectomy Devices for Treating Acute Ischemic Stroke. Endovascular Today, 6, 68-74.
[20] Lally, F., Grunwald, I.Q., Sanyal, R., et al. (2013) Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Review of the Literature, Clinical Effectiveness and Future Use. CNS & Neurological Disorders Drug Targets, 12, 170-190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Baker, W.L., Colby, J.A., Tongbram, V., et al. (2011) Neurothrombectomy Devices for the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: State of the Evidence. Annals of Internal Medicine, 154, 243-252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Balasubramaian, A., Mitchell, P., Dowling, R., et al. (2015) Evolution of Endovascular Therapy in Acute Stroke: Implications of Device Development. Journal of Stroke, 17, 127-137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Hameed, A., Zafar, H., Mylotte, D., et al. (2017) Recent Trends in Clot Retrieval Devices: A Review. Cardiology and Therapy, 6, 193-202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Kang, D.-H. and Park, J. (2017) Endovascular Stroke Therapy Focused on Stent Retriever Thrombectomy and Direct Clot Aspiration: Historical Review and Modern Application. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 60, 335-347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Hasan, T.F., Todnem, N., Gopal, N., et al. (2019) Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke. Current Cardiology Reports, 21, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Kang, D.-H. and Hwang, Y.-H. (2019) Frontline Contact Aspiration Treatment for Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion: A Review Focused on Practical Techniques. Journal of Stroke, 21, 10-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Mokin, M., Khalessi, A.A., Mocco, J., et al. (2014) Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: The End or Just the Beginning? Neurosurgical Focus, 36, E5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[28] 刘圣, 施海彬, 李麟荪. 急性缺血性脑卒中的介入治疗进展[J]. 国外医学临床放射学分册, 2005, 28(3): 170-173.
[29] 姚丹, 包元飞, 朱武生. 机械取栓治疗急性脑梗死的现状和展望[J]. 中国脑血管病杂, 2013, 10(12): 659-662.
[30] Spiotta, A.M., Chaudry, M.I., Hui, F.K., et al. (2015) Evolution of Thrombectomy Approaches and Devices for Acute Stroke: A Technical Review. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 7, 2-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Gobin, Y.P., Starkman, S., Duckwiler, G.R., et al. (2004) MERCI 1: A Phase 1 Study of Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia. Stroke, 35, 2848-2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[32] Bose, A., Henkes, H., Alfke, K., et al. (2008) The Penumbra System: A Mechanical Device for the Treatment of Acute Stroke Due to Thromboembolism. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 29, 1409-1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[33] Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial Investigators (2009) The Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial: Safety and Effectiveness of a New Generation of Mechanical Devices for Clot Removal in Intracranial Large Vessel Occlusive Disease. Stroke, 40, 2761-2768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[34] Yoo, A.J., Frei, D., Tateshima, S., et al. (2012) The Penumbra Stroke System: A Technical Review. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery, 4, 199-205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Kang, D.-H., Hwang, Y.-H., Kim, Y.-S., et al. (2011) Direct Thrombus Retrieval Using the Reperfusion Catheter of the Penumbra System: Forced-Suction Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 32, 283-287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[36] Kowoll, A., Weber, A., Mpotsaris, A., et al. (2016) Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique for the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Initial Experience at a European Stroke Center. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 8, 230-234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Spiotta, A., Fargen, K.M., Chaudry, I., et al. (2016) ADAPT: A Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique. Endovascular Today, 15, 68-70.
[38] Turk, A.S., Frei, D., Fiorella, D., et al. (2018) ADAPT FAST Study: A Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique for Acute Stroke Thrombectomy. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 10, i4-i7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Mokin, M., Ionita, C.N., Nagesh, S.V.S., et al. (2015) Primary Stentriever versus Combined Stentriever plus Aspiration Thrombectomy Approaches: In Vitro Stroke Model Comparison. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 7, 453-457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Turk, A.S., Turner, R., Spiotta, A., et al. (2015) Comparison of Endovascular Treatment Approaches for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Cost Effectiveness, Technical Success, and Clinical Outcomes. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 7, 666-670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Saber, H., Rajah, G.B., Kherallah, R.Y., et al. (2018) Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Thrombectomy Devices in Acute Stroke: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 10, 729-734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Ducroux, C., Piotin, M., Gory, B., et al. (2020) First Pass Effect with Contact Aspiration and Stent Retrievers in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) Trial. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 12, 386-391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Kang, D.-H., Kim, J.W., Kim, B.M., et al. (2019) Need for Rescue Treatment and Its Implication: Stent Retriever versus Contact Aspiration Thrombectomy. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 11, 979-983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Martini, M., Mocco, J., Turk, A., et al. (2019) “Real-World” Comparison of First-Line Direct Aspiration and Stent Retriever Mechanical Thrombectomy for the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Anterior Circulation: A Multicenter International Retrospective Study. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 11, 957-963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Turk, A.S., Siddiqui, A., Fifi, J.T., et al. (2019) Aspiration Thrombectomy versus Stent Retriever Thrombectomy as First-Line Approach for Large Vessel Occlusion (COMPASS): A Multicentre, Randomised, Open Label, Blinded Outcome, Non-Inferiority Trial. The Lancet (London, England), 393, 998-1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[46] Ye, G., Lu, J., Qi, P., et al. (2019) Firstline a Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique versus Firstline Stent Retriever for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 11, 740-746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

为你推荐