大五人格特质与无领导小组讨论测评得分的关系研究
Research on the Relationship between Big Five Personality Traits and Evaluation Score of Leaderless Group Discussion
摘要: 无领导小组讨论结构效度的研究越来越关注情境特征与特质维度的交互作用，而人格特质的作用有待进一步明确。模拟应聘情境，对35名被试进行大五人格测试后，随机分组进行无领导小组讨论实验。结果显示，1) 被试的人格特质得分与LGD测评得分之间不存在显著相关水平，相关系数最高为0.21。但人格特质与LGD维度得分及被试对自我评价存在关联；2) LGD测评得分与被试在讨论中的行为表现具有较高水平的相关，LGD维度间的相关性低于行为绩效与LGD维度之间的相关性；3) 被试的特定表现与组内成员的评价及LGD测评得分联系紧密。同时，通过群体决策的角度探讨LGD的评分过程和影响因素，为该领域研究结构效度提供了新的视角。
Abstract: In recent years, more and more attention has been paid to the interaction between situational features and trait dimensions, while the role of personality traits needs to be further clarified. After the big five personality test, 35 subjects were randomly divided into groups for leaderless group discussion. The results showed that: 1) There was no significant correlation between the scores of personality traits and LGD, and the highest correlation coefficient was 0.21. However, personality traits were associated with LGD dimension scores and subjects’ self-evaluation; 2) There was a high level of correlation between LGD scores and participants’ behavior performance in discussion, and the correlation between LGD dimensions was lower than that between behavior performance and LGD dimensions; 3) The specific performance of subjects was closely related to the evaluation of members in the group and the scores of LGD. At the same time, this paper discusses the scoring process and influencing factors of LGD from the perspective of group decision-making, which provides a new perspective for construct validity research in this field.
文章引用：陈培峰, 魏玉华 (2020). 大五人格特质与无领导小组讨论测评得分的关系研究. 心理学进展, 10(9), 1381-1388. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2020.109162

参考文献

[1] 赫寅(2014). 大五人格测验与无领导小组讨论的结果相关性研究. 硕士论文, 北京: 北京交通大学.
[2] 王孟成, 戴晓阳, 姚树桥(2011). 中国大五人格问卷的初步编制III: 简式版的制定及信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19(4), 454-457.
[3] 周颖萍(2004). 浅析大五人格特质和社会群体地位的关系. 齐鲁师范学院学报, 19(6), 41-43.
[4] Arthur Jr., J.W., Woehr, D. J., & Maldegen, R. (2000). Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Assessment Center Dimensions: A Conceptual and Empirical Re-Examination of the Assessment Center Construct-Related Validity Paradox. Journal of Management, 26, 813-835.
[CrossRef] 
[5] Arthur, W., Day, E. A., Mcnelly, T. L., & Edens, P. S. (2003). A Meta-Analysis of the Criterion-Related Validity of Assessment Center Dimensions. Personnel Psychology, 56, 125-153.
[CrossRef] 
[6] Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30.
[CrossRef] 
[7] Bowler, M. C., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of the Impact of Dimension and Exercise Factors on Assessment Center Ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1114-1124.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Collins, J. M., Schmidt, F. L., Sanchez Ku, M., Thomas, L., Mcdaniel, M. A., & Le, H. (2010). Can Basic Individual Differences Shed Light on the Construct Meaning of Assessment Center Evaluations? International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 11, 17-29.
[CrossRef] 
[9] Day, D. V., & Sulsky, L. M. (1995). Effects of Frame-of-Reference Training and Information Configuration on Memory Organization and Rating Accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 158-167.
[CrossRef] 
[10] Gaugler, B. B., Rosenthal, D. B., Thornton, G. C., & Bentson, C. (1987). Meta-Analysis of Assessment Center Validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 493-511.
[CrossRef] 
[11] Gibbons, A. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2009). Dimension Consistency as an Individual Difference: A New (Old) Perspective on the Assessment Center Construct Validity Debate. Journal of Management, 35, 1154-1180.
[CrossRef] 
[12] Goffin, R. D., Rothstein, M. G., & Johnston, N. G. (1996). Personality Testing and the Assessment Center: Incremental Validity for Managerial Selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 746-756.
[CrossRef] 
[13] Graziano, W. G., Jensencampbell, L. A., & Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving Interpersonal Conflict and Reacting to It: The Case for Agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 820-835.
[CrossRef] 
[14] Hoffman, B. J., Kennedy, C. L., Lopilato, A. C., Monahan, E. L., & Lance, C. E. (2015). A Review of the Content, Criterion-Related, and Construct-Related Validity of Assessment Center Exercises. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1143-1168.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Howard, A. (2008). Making Assessment Centers Work the Way They Are Supposed to. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 98-104.
[CrossRef] 
[16] Kniffin, K. M., Wansink, B., Griskevicius, V., & Wilson, D. S. (2014). Beauty Is in the In-Group of the Beholded: Intergroup Differences in the Perceived Attractiveness of Leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 1143-1153.
[CrossRef] 
[17] Lance, C. E., Newbolt, W. H., Gatewood, R. D., Foster, M. R., French, N. R., & Smith, D. E. (2000). Assessment Center Exercise Factors Represent Cross-Situational Specificity, Not Method Bias. Human Performance, 13, 323-353.
[CrossRef] 
[18] Lievens, F., & Conway, J. M. (2001). Dimension and Exercise Variance in Assessment Center Scores: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Multitrait-Multimethod Studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1202-1222.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Love, K. G., & Dearmond, S. (2007). The Validity of Assessment Center Ratings and 16 PF Personality Trait Scores in Police Sergeant Promotions: A Case of Incremental Validity. Public Personnel Management, 36, 21-32.
[CrossRef] 
[20] Meriac, J. P., Hoffman, B. J., Woehr, D. J., & Fleisher, M. S. (2008). Further Evidence for the Validity of Assessment Center Dimensions: A Meta-Analysis of the Incremental Criterion-Related Validity of Dimension Ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1042-1052.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Neidig, R. D., & Neidig, P. J. (1984). Multiple Assessment Center Exercises and Job Relatedness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 182-186.
[CrossRef] 
[22] Sackett, P. R., & Dreher, G. F. (1982). Constructs and Assessment Center Dimensions: Some Troubling Empirical Findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 401-410.
[CrossRef] 
[23] Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Davidson, R. A. (2004). The Role of Individualism and the Five-Factor Model in the Prediction of Performance in a Leaderless Group Discussion. Journal of Personality, 72, 1-28.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Woehr, D. J., & Arthur, W. (2003). The Construct-Related Validity of Assessment Center Ratings: A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Role of Methodological Factors. Journal of Management, 29, 231-258.
[CrossRef]