行政协议范围及救济程序问题探究
Exploring the Scope of Administrative Agreement and Remedy Procedure
摘要: 最高人民法院颁布的《关于审理行政协议案件若干问题的规定》,该司法解释重新界定行政协议的概念和范围。行政协议的认定标准主要有主体标准说、目的标准说、内容标准说、职责标准说以及意思标准说。关于行政协议的救济途径问题,该司法解释指出通过行政机关先行做出履行决定或书面决定后,在法定期限内申请法院强制执行的方式,构建出行政协议中行政机关的救济途径。这一救济途径虽保证了行政协议双方当事人的相对平等,但仍需完善行政机关救济途径的相关程序性规定。
Abstract: Promulgated by the Supreme People's Court on several issues of administrative agreement cases, the judicial interpretation defines the concept of administrative agreement and the scope of ad-ministrative agreements. The identification standards of administrative agreement mainly include the subject standard, the purpose standard, the content standard, the responsibility standard and the meaning standard. As for the remedy way of administrative agreement, the judicial interpretation points out that the administrative organ can apply to the court for compulsory ex-ecution within the legal time limit after the administrative organ first makes the decision of per-formance or written decision, so as to construct the remedy way of administrative organ in the administrative agreement. Although this remedy approach ensures the relative equality of both parties in the administrative agreement, it still needs to impr
文章引用:吴慧吉. 行政协议范围及救济程序问题探究[J]. 法学, 2020, 8(4): 557-562. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2020.84078

参考文献

[1] 王利明. 论行政协议的范围——兼评《关于审理行政协议案件若干问题的规定》第1条、第2条[J]. 环球法律评论, 2020(1): 5-22.
[2] 麻锦亮. 纠缠在行政性与协议性之间的行政协议[J]. 中国法律评论, 2017(1): 56-60.
[3] 李颖轶. 论法国行政合同优益权的成因[J]. 复旦学报, 2015, 57(6): 157-164.
[4] 李卫刚, 赵珂冉. 行政协议识别标准的模式化研究[J]. 西北师大学报, 2020(2): 103-112.
[5] 陈天昊. 行政协议的识别与边界[J]. 中国法学, 2019(1): 140-163.