行政机关作为环境公益诉讼原告的思考
Thoughts on Administrative Organs as Plaintiffs in Environmental Public Interest Litigation
DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2020.84081, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 尹铭育, 张雨檬:西南交通大学公共管理与政法学院,四川 成都
关键词: 环境公益诉讼原告资格行政机关Environmental Public Interest Litigation Plaintiff Qualification Administrative Agency
摘要: 新《民事诉讼法》确立了环境公益诉讼制度,法律规定了一定的主体可以提起环境公益诉讼。然而,原有的主体限制并不符合环境公益诉讼进一步发展的要求,有不少学者提出赋予公民、行政机关、检察机关提起原告诉讼的资格。在我国,行政机关作为环境公益诉讼原告提起公益诉讼在合理性和效益性上都值得探讨。本文将通过对诉讼结构、行政机关作为原告的实际效果的介绍以及与外国的对比,阐明行政机关为什么不适合被赋予原告资格。
Abstract: The new “Civil Procedure Law” establishes an environmental public interest litigation system, and the law stipulates that certain subjects can initiate environmental public interest litigation. How-ever, the original subject restriction does not meet the requirements of the further development of environmental public interest litigation. Many scholars have proposed to grant citizens, admin-istrative agencies, and procuratorial agencies the qualifications to bring plaintiffs. In our country, as the plaintiff of environmental public interest litigation, the administrative agency’s public interest litigation is worthy of discussion in terms of rationality and effectiveness. This article will introduce the litigation structure, the actual effect of the administrative agency as the plaintiff, and the comparison with foreign countries to clarify why the administrative agency is not suitable for being guaranteed the status of the plaintiff.
文章引用:尹铭育, 张雨檬. 行政机关作为环境公益诉讼原告的思考[J]. 法学, 2020, 8(4): 573-579. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2020.84081

参考文献

[1] 张式军. 我国环境公益诉讼原告类型和体系探讨[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2007, 29(3): 79-83, 89.
[2] 张秀秀. 环境保护行政机关作为环境公益诉讼原告的顺位[C]//生态文明的法制保障——2013 年全国环境资源法学研讨会论文集, 2013.
[3] 贾志民, 王敏. 从美国环境公益诉讼制度谈中国环境保护问题的法律对策[J]. 华北电力大学学报(社会科学版), 2007(4): 28-32.
[4] 张颖. 美国环境公共信托理论及环境公益保护机制对我国的启示[J]. 政治与法律, 2011(6): 112-120.
[5] 沈寿文. 环境公益诉讼行政机关原告资格之反思——基于宪法原理的分析[J]. 当代法学, 2013, 27(1): 61-67.
[6] 龚学徳. 行政机关提起环境公益诉讼的弊端[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2012, 34(5): 30.
[7] 王东艳. 行政机关提起环境公益诉讼的经济学分析[J]. 东方企业文化, 2013(20): 250-251.