胸腔镜手术硬膜外镇痛与椎旁阻滞的比较
Epidural Analgesia versus Paravertebral Block in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
摘要: 在胸腔镜手术患者中,在疼痛控制和术后并发症发生率方面,多数研究结果表明,椎旁阻滞(paravertebral block, PVB)优于硬膜外镇痛(epidural analgesia, EP)。目前,直接比较PVB和EP在疼痛控制和术后结局方面的研究数量有限,尚无大规模的随机试验报道。但其中有4篇论文为此提供了最好的证据说明,四篇中有3篇是小型前瞻性随机试验,最后一篇文献是一项小的队列研究。从疼痛控制的角度来看,没有确凿的证据表明这两种方法谁更有效;一项研究表明EP显著降低了疼痛水平(P = 0.01),第二项研究表明PVB明显改善了疼痛控制(P < 0.01),第三项研究未能证明任何显著差异(P = 0.899)。PVB组和EP组需要追加镇痛的频率相似(56% vs 48%, P = 0.26)。与EP相比,PVB的术后并发症发生率更低,特别是尿潴留(64% vs 34.6%, P = 0.0036)和低血压(32% vs 7%, P = 0.0031; 21% vs 3%, P = 0.02) 。而在PVB组中,联合使用舒芬太尼的研究较少,其安全性和有效性值得我们深入研究。
Abstract: According to most research results, in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, paravertebral block (PVB) is superior to epidural analgesia (EP) in terms of pain control and its postoperative complication rates. At present, there are a limited number of studies directly com-paring pain control and postoperative outcomes between PVB and EP, and no large-scale random-ized trials have been reported. But, there were four papers that represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. Three of the 4 papers are small prospective randomized trials, with a small cohort study featuring as the final piece of literature. There is no conclusive body of evidence to recommend either route as more efficacious from a pain control perspective; one study demonstrated significantly lower levels of pain with EP (P = 0.01), with a second study demon-strating significantly better pain control with PVB (P < 0.01) and a third failing to demonstrate any significant difference (P = 0.899). The frequency of requiring supplemental analgesia was similar between the PVB and EP cohorts (56% vs 48%, P = 0.26). PVB is associated with lower rates of postoperative complications compared to EP, specifically urinary retention (64% vs 34.6%, P = 0.0036) and hypotension (32% vs 7%, P = 0.0031; 21% vs 3%, P = 0.02). In the PVB group, there are few studies on the combined use of sufentanil, and its safety and effectiveness deserve our in-depth study.
文章引用:赵集, 杨敏, 刘闵, 李炬颖, 吴丹. 胸腔镜手术硬膜外镇痛与椎旁阻滞的比较[J]. 医学诊断, 2020, 10(3): 164-167. https://doi.org/10.12677/MD.2020.103026

参考文献

[1] Harkya, A., Clarkeb, C.G., Kar, A., et al. (2019) Epidural Analgesia versus Paravertebral Block Invideo-Assisted Tho-racoscopic Surgery. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 28, 404-406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Henderson, J.M., Brodsky, D.A., Fisher, D.M., et al. (1988) Pre-Induction of Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients with Nasally Administered Sufentanil. Anesthesiology, 68, 796-798.
[3] Schnabel, A., Reichl, S.U., Kranke, P., et al. (2010) Efficacy and Safety of Paravertebral Blocks in Breast Surgery: A Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 105, 842-852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Karmakar, M.K. (2001) Thoracic Paravertebral Block. Anesthesiology, 95, 777-780.
[5] Kosinski, S., Fryzlewicz, E., Wilkojc, M., Cmiel, A., Zielinski, M., et al. (2016) Comparison of Continuous Epidural Block and Continuous Paravertebral Block in Postoperative Analgaesia after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy: A Randomised, Non-Inferiority Trial. Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy, 48, 280-287.
[6] Okajima, H., Tanaka, O., Ushio, M., Higuchi, Y., Nagai, Y., Iijima, K., et al. (2015) Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Thoracic Paravertebral Block Provides Comparable Analgesia and Fewer Episodes of Hypotension than Continuous Epidural Block after Lung Surgery. Journal of Anesthesia, 29, 373-378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Kashiwagi, Y., Iida, T., Kunisawa, T. and Iwasaki, H. (2015) Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block Compared with the Epidural Analgesia in Patients Un-dergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery. Masui, 64, 1010-1014.
[8] Khoshbin, E., Al-Jilaihawi, A.N., Scott, N.B., Prakash, D. and Kirk, A.J.B. (2011) An Audit of Pain Control Pathways Following Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery. Innovations, 6, 248-252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 宋金玲, 孙立新, 王明山. 椎旁神经阻滞或硬膜外阻滞复合全麻对开胸手术炎性反应的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学, 2013, 29(5): 472-474.
[10] 游艳艳, 张琴, 张毅, 等. 超声引导椎旁神经阻滞用于开胸术后镇痛效果的比较[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2013, 29(9): 853-855.
[11] 康志宇, 王庚, 朱丰, 等. 不同剂量地塞米松用于超声引导神经刺激器定位肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞效果的观察[J]. 中国医药导报, 2015, 12(5): 81-85.
[12] Ionescu, T.I., Taverne, R.H., Houweling, P.L., et al. (1991) Pharmacokinetic Study of Extra-dural and Intrathecal Sufentanil Anaesthesia for Major Surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 66, 458-464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 王玉洁, 徐懋. 鞘内注射阿片类药物用于骨科手术后镇痛的研究进展[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2019, 35(3): 306-309.