企业身份的话语建构策略探究——基于华为社会责任报告中领导人致辞的批评话语分析
On the Discursive Construction Strategies of Corporate Identity—Critical Discourse Analysis Based on Leaders’ Speeches in Huawei Corporate Social Responsibility Report
DOI: 10.12677/ML.2020.85091, PDF,   
作者: 霍丽云:天津商业大学外国语学院,天津;郭 松:天津商业大学,天津
关键词: 身份建构话语策略社会责任报告Identity Construction Discursive Strategies Corporate Social Responsibility Report
摘要: 企业作为一个机构,通过发布社会责任报告参与社会实践,再现企业一年以来对员工、股东、供应商、消费者、客户、社区、自然环境等相关利益方有影响的社会实践,建构自身身份与形象并构建与利益相关方之间的社会关系。领导人致辞作为社会责任报告书不可或缺的一部分,在建立和提升企业声誉,树立企业形象以及企业身份建构方面起着重要作用。本文以华为社会责任报告书中领导人致辞为语料,采用语篇–历史研究路径的话语分析框架,从话语策略维度入手,分析领导人致辞的话语策略实现方式及语言特点,阐释华为企业身份建构的特点,旨在揭示其话语策略体现的积极的自我构建过程,从而展现企业形象。
Abstract: Enterprises, as an organization, participate in social practice by issuing social responsibility reports, reproduce the social practices that have affected the relevant stakeholders such as employees, shareholders, suppliers, consumers, customers, communities, natural environment, etc. during the past year. Enterprises construct their own identity and image, and construct social relations with stakeholders. As an integral part of the corporate social responsibility report, leaders’ speeches play an important role in establishing and enhancing corporate reputation, establishing corporate image and corporate identity. This study uses leaders’ speeches in Huawei’s Social Responsibility report (then CSR) as data and the Discourse-Historical Approach as framework to analyze discursive strategies of the CSR in the realization and language characteristics of enterprise identity construction, aiming to illustrate the characteristics of Huawei corporate identity construction and reveal the process of positive self-construction of it so as to show the enterprise external image.
文章引用:霍丽云, 郭松. 企业身份的话语建构策略探究——基于华为社会责任报告中领导人致辞的批评话语分析[J]. 现代语言学, 2020, 8(5): 672-679. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2020.85091

参考文献

[1] 陈建平, 王加林. 互文性与身份建构话语策略[J]. 中国外语, 2014(2): 32-38.
[2] Coupland, C. and Brown, A.D. (2004) Constructing Organizational Identities on the Web: A Case Study of Royal Dutch/Shell. Journal of Management Studies, 8, 1325-1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Wagner, U. and Pedersen, K.M. (2014) The IOC and the Doping Issue: An Institutional Discursive Approach to Organizational Identity Construction. Sport Management Review, 2, 160-173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Benwell, B. and Stokoe, E. (2006) Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 4.
[5] Kroskrity, P. (1999) Identity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9, 111-114.
[6] 陈新仁. 语用学视角下的身份研究: 关键问题与主要路径[J]. 现代外语, 2014, 37(5): 702-710.
[7] Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press, Cam-bridge.
[8] Atakan-Dumana, S. and Ozdora-Aksakb, E. (2014) The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Online Identity Construction. An Analysis of Turkey Public Relations Review, 5, 862-864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 谷小娟, 李艺. 语言与身份构建: 相关文献回顾[J]. 外语学刊, 2007(6): 101-108.
[10] 廖美珍. 中国法庭互动话语formulation现象研究[J]. 外语研究, 2006(2): 1-8.
[11] 吕万英. 法官话语的权力支配[J]. 外语研究, 2006(2): 9-13.
[12] 陈剑敏. 顺应论视阈中的中英法庭话语研究[J]. 山东社会科学, 2011(8): 116-119.
[13] 王建. 角色建构的话语策略——以法庭调解为例[J]. 外国语文, 2012(4): 75-79.
[14] 袁周敏. 身份建构的应用研究述评[J]. 山东外语教学, 2013(2): 38-43.
[15] 董平荣. 多重身份关系在机构会话中的再现与重构[J]. 外语教学, 2012(1): 51-55.
[16] 何永成. 机构话语视阈中的教师自主发展[J]. 学术界, 2007(2): 81-87.
[17] 徐涛. 机构话语的“越界”[J]. 外语教学, 2006, 27(3): 28-32.
[18] 徐涛, 张迈曾. 高等教育话语的新变迁——机构身份再构建的跨学科研究[J]. 河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2004, 29(3): 108-110.
[19] 田海龙. 批评话语分析: 阐释、思考、应用[M]. 天津: 南开大学出版社, 2014.
[20] 陈建平. 中外大学机构身份话语建构比较研究[J]. 中国外语, 2016, 13(4): 29-39.
[21] 陈建平. 中英美大学机构身份的话语建构策略比较[J]. 现代外语, 2017, 40(1): 24-36.
[22] 孙咏梅, 张艳斌. 从“北大简介”看大学身份的话语建构[J]. 中国社会语言学, 2013(1): 66-74.
[23] Sun, Y. and Jiang, J.L. (2014) Metaphor Use in Chinese and US Corporate Mission Statements: A Cognitive Sociolinguistic Analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 33, 4-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] 王立非, 部寒. 中美银行年报语篇结构关系自动描写及功能对比分析[J]. 中国外语, 2016, 13(4): 10-19.
[25] 王立非, 部寒. 中美银行英文年报语篇结构关系及传播策略个案分析[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2019(4): 1-13+146.
[26] 陈品英, 沈洁. 基于语料库的中美企业社会责任报告体裁对比分析[J]. 鸡西大学学报, 2016, 16(12): 104-107.
[27] 乌楠, 张敬源. 中美企业机构身份的话语建构策略[J]. 现代外语, 2019(2): 220-230.
[28] Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. Sage, London, 17.
[29] Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2001) Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. Routledge, London, 45.
[30] Hart, C. (2010) Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Palgrave, Basingstoke, 49-63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Degano, C. (2010) Linguistic Perspectives on Image Construction and Moral Identity: The Case of Banks. In: Evangelisti-Allori, P. and Garzone, G., Eds., Discourse, Identities and Genres in Corporate Communication, Peter Lang, Bern, 235-261.
[32] Hyland, K. and Jiang, F. (2017) Is Academic Writing Becoming More Informal? English for Specific Purposes, 45, 40-51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] 易利. 中美企业介绍语篇的语域对比分析[J]. 宜宾学院学报, 2014, 14(7): 104-108.
[34] 赵芃. “学雷锋活动”历史变迁的话语研究[M]. 天津: 南开大学出版社, 2017: 34.
[35] Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2014) The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA). In: Wodak, R. and Meyer, M., Eds., Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, Peking University Press, Beijing, 87-121.
[36] Levinson, S.C. (2001) Pragmatics. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Beijing, 168.
[37] 汤敬安. 情态动词的语用综观性[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2008(9): 19-21.
[38] Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2001) The Discourse-Historical Approach. In: Wodak, R. and Meyer, M., Eds., Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, Sage, London, 63-94.