青岛市黄岛区街道绿化植物滞尘效应分析
Analysis of Dust Retention Effect of Greening Plants in Huangdao District of Qingdao
DOI: 10.12677/AEP.2020.105080, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 吴彤彤, 许 昌, 赵艳云, 唐小玲*:山东科技大学安全与环境工程学院,山东 青岛
关键词: 植物叶片滞尘效益绿化搭配滞尘能力Plant Leaves Dust Retention Benefit Green Matching Dust Retention Capacity
摘要: 本文选取青岛市黄岛区具有代表性的绿化植物及绿地进行采样研究,采用重量差值法和不同类型植物搭配的样方分析法,定量测量了三功能区14个常见植物的单位表面滞尘能力和7个典型搭配样方的总滞尘能力。研究表明:供试植物的变异系数在0.05~0.39之间,最大的是草本类的沿阶草,最小的是乔木类的黄栌。PM10 (可吸入颗粒物)占TSP (总悬浮颗粒物)滞尘比例大于80%的有中山杉、金边黄杨、小叶黄杨、红叶石楠、连翘、剑叶金鸡菊、石榴,其中中山杉比例最大,达到94.89%。金边黄杨和石榴变异系数小且PM10占TSP滞尘比例较大,可作为优选绿化植物。公园的单位叶面积滞尘量和单株植物滞尘量都要明显小于车流量较大的科大北门和交通局。滞尘量最多的样方搭配是最少的19倍,此种搭配(梧桐–小叶黄杨–冬青)每样方(5 m × 3 m)的滞尘量达到2486 g。依据不同绿化植物和立体感进行搭配,为绿化植物选择及降低大气颗粒物污染提供依据。
Abstract: In this paper, the representative green plants and green spaces in Huangdao District of Qingdao were selected for sampling, using the method of weight difference and quadrat analysis of different types of plants, the dust retention capacity per unit surface of 14 common plants in three functional areas and the total dust retention capacity of 7 typical samples were measured. The results show that the coefficient of variation of the tested plants is between 0.05 - 0.39, the largest is the herb Ophiopogon bodinieri level; the smallest is the tall tree Cotinus coggygria. PM10 (inhalable particu-lates) accounted for more than 80% of TSP (total suspended particulates) dust retention ratio. There were Zhongshan fir, Phnom Penh boxwood, Euonymus japonicus, red leaf Shi Nan, forsythia suspending, sword leaf chrysanthemum, pomegranate, and the highest proportion of Zhongshan fir reached 94.89%. The coefficient of variation of Phnom Penh boxwood and pomegranate are small, and PM10 accounts for a large proportion of TSP dust retention, so they can be used as optimal greening plants. The amount of dust retention per unit leaf area and per plant in the park is signifi-cantly smaller than that in the north gate of Keda and the Transportation Bureau with large traffic volume. The collocation Wutong is the most common sample collocation at least 19 times. The dust holding capacity of each sample (5 m × 3 m) of this combination (Chinese parasol-Euonymus japonicus-holly) is 2486 g. According to different greening plants and three-dimensional sense, it can provide basis for greening plant selection and reducing air particle pollution.
文章引用:吴彤彤, 许昌, 赵艳云, 唐小玲. 青岛市黄岛区街道绿化植物滞尘效应分析[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2020, 10(5): 644-652. https://doi.org/10.12677/AEP.2020.105080

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国生态环境部[EB/OL].
http://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk15/201912/t20191231_754087.html, 2016-06-02.
[2] 郝吉明, 马广大, 王书肖. 大气污染控制工程(第三版) [M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2010.
[3] Souch, C.A. and Souch, C. (1993) The Effect of Trees on Summertime Below Canopy Urban Climates: A Case Study Bloomington, Indiana. Arbor, 19, 303-312.
[4] Dzierzanowski, K., Popek, R., et al. (2011) Deposition of Particulate Matter of Different Size Fractions on Leaf Surfaces and in Waxes of Urban Forest Species. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 13, 1037-1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Abd El-Monem, A.A., Azmy, A.M. and Mahmoud, S.A. (2013) Performance Analysis of Polymer Electrolyte Membrance Fuel Cells for Electric Vehicle Applications. 2013 IEEE Grenoble Conference, Grenoble, 16-20 June 2013, 1-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 李海梅, 王珂. 青岛市城阳区5 种绿化植物滞尘能力研究[J]. 山东林业科技, 2009, 39(3): 34-36.
[7] 张桐, 洪秀玲, 孙立炜, 刘玉军. 6种植物叶片的滞尘能力与其叶面结构的关系[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(6): 70-77.
[8] 黄承石, 潘珈瑶, 王东, 谢芹, 胡蝶. 5种润楠属植物叶表皮结构和滞尘能力研究[J]. 河南科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 40(2): 76-79.
[9] 徐晶, 徐振华. 浅谈园林树木的滞尘功能与应用[J]. 河北林业科技, 2017(2): 64-68.
[10] 江胜利, 金荷仙, 许小连. 杭州市常见道路绿化植物滞尘能力研究[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2011, 31(6): 45-49.
[11] 韩敬, 陈广艳, 杨银萍. 临沂市滨河大道主要绿化植物滞尘能力的研究[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2009(6): 141-142.
[12] EL-Khatib, A.A., El-Rahman, A.M. and Elsheikh, O.M. (2011) Leaf Geometric Design of Urban Trees: Potentiality to Capture Airborne Particle Pollutants. Journal of Environmental Studies, 7, 49-59.
[13] 莫若果, 招礼军, 朱栗琼, 化彬. 南宁市4种绿化树种的滞尘效益评估[J]. 广西科学, 2019, 25(2): 217-222.
[14] 罗曼. 不同群落结构绿地对大气污染物的消减作用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2013.
[15] 冯建军, 沈家芬, 苏开君. 广州市道路绿化模式环境效益分析[J]. 城市道路与城市生态, 2001, 14(2): 4-6.
[16] 郑少文, 邢国明, 李军, 等. 不同绿地类型的滞尘效应比较[J]. 山西农业科学, 2008, 36(5): 70-72.
[17] 刘学全, 唐万鹏, 周志翔, 等. 宜昌市城区不同绿地类型环境效应[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2004, 32(5): 53-54+83.
[18] 张新献, 古润泽, 陈自新, 李延明, 韩丽莉, 李辉. 北京城市居住区绿地的滞尘效益[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 1997, 19(4): 12-17.
[19] 李上志, 姚必华, 吴安定, 等. 温州城市道路交通体系中绿化的滞尘特征研究[J]. 安徽建筑, 2017, 24(4): 259-262.