公共事务参与与流动老人流入地认同的关系
The Relationship between Public Affairs Participation and Elderly Migrants’ Identity towards Inflowing Areas
摘要: 目的：考察流动老人的流入地认同现状以及公共事务参与和流动老人流入地认同的关系，为鼓励我国流动老人积极参与公共事务，提升流动老人流入地认同提供理论依据。方法：利用2017年全国流动人口动态监测调查数据，通过多元线性回归模型，分析了公共事务参与和流动老人流入地认同的关系(N = 5645)。结果：流动老人总体上的公共事务参与度较低(M = 4.519, SD = 1.173)，流入地认同相对较高(M = 25.780, SD = 3.423)；除文化认同维度外，公共事务参与对流动老人流入地认同的各维度均有正向预测作用(β = 0.03~0.07, P < 0.05)，其中公共事务参与对流动老人城市认同的预测作用最为突出(β = 0.07, P < 0.01)；流动老人的个人特征、家庭特征以及社区特征均与流入地认同显著相关。在控制了样本的个人特征、家庭特征以及社区特征后，公共事务参与依然显著预测流动老人流入地认同。
Abstract: Objective: This paper investigates the elderly migrants’ identity towards inflowing areas, and its relationship with public affairs participation, so as to provide some theoretical reference for promoting the public affairs participation of the elderly migrants and enhancing their identity of inflowing areas. Methods: Using the national data of China Migrants Dynamic Survey published by the National Health Commission in 2017, through constructing multiple linear regression model, this paper analyzes the impact of public affairs participation on elderly migrants’ identity towards inflowing areas (n = 5645). Results: The public affairs participation of elderly migrants was low (M = 4.519, SD = 1.173), and their identity towards inflowing areas was relatively high (M = 25.780, SD = 3.423); except for the dimension of cultural identity, public affairs participation had a positive predictive effect on other dimensions of identity (β = 0.03 - 0.07, all P < 0.05), among which public affairs participation acted as a most important predictor in improving urban identity of elderly migrants (β = 0.07, P < 0.01). The personal characteristics, family characteristics and community characteristics of elderly migrants will significantly be correlated with the sample’s identity towards inflowing areas. After controlling the sample’s personal characteristics, family char-acteristics and community characteristics, public affairs participation still significantly predicted the elderly migrants’ identity towards inflowing areas.
文章引用：安蔚, 支愧云, 林秋韵, 王庆娅, 刘枚枚. 公共事务参与与流动老人流入地认同的关系[J]. 现代管理, 2020, 10(5): 769-778. https://doi.org/10.12677/MM.2020.105091

参考文献

[1] 国家统计局. 人口总量平稳增长人口素质显著提升——新中国成立70周年经济社会发展成就系列报告之二十[R]. 2019.
[2] 李升, 黄造玉. 超大城市流动老人的主观健康状况及其影响因素[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2018, 35(5): 3-9.
[3] 杨菊华. 从隔离、选择融入到融合: 流动人口社会融入问题的理论思考[J]. 人口研究, 2009, 33(1): 17-29.
[4] 谢治菊. 比较与反思: 村民社区参与对社区认同影响之实证研究[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2012, 12(4): 34-43.
[5] 林崇德, 杨治良, 黄希庭. 心理学大辞典(上)[M]. 上海: 上海教育出版社,, 2003: 11, 1011.
[6] 孔娜娜. 认知、服务、参与: 新生代农民工认同建构与社区融入[J]. 学习与实践, 2013(2): 68-73.
[7] Tafel, H. and Turner, J.C. (1986) The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In: Psy-chology of Intergroup Relations, Nelson Hall, Chicago, 7-24.
[8] Fernandez-Salinero, S., Collantes, A.G., Cifuentes, F.R. and Topa, G. (2020) Is Job Involvement Enough for Achieving Job Satisfaction? The Role of Skills Use and Group Identification. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 2-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Cardenas, D. and de la Sablonniere, R. (2020) Participating in a New Group and the Identification Processes: The Quest for a Positive Social Identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59, 189-208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 李志刚, 梁奇, 林赛南. 转型期中国大城市流动人口的身份认同、特征与机制[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(1): 40-49.
[11] Stryker, S. and Burke, P.J. (2000) The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 284-297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Main, K. and Sandoval, G.F. (2015) Place-Making in a Translocal Receiving Community: The Relevance of Place to Identity and Agency. Urban Studies, 52, 71-86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Fritsche, I., Jonas, E. and Ablasser, C. (2013) The Power of We: Evidence for Group-Based Control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 19-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] 辛素飞, 明朗, 辛自强. 群际信任的增进: 社会认同和群际接触的方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(2): 290-299.
[15] Levine, R.M., Prosser, A., Evans, D. and Reicher, S.D. (2005) Identity and Emergency Intervention: How Social Group Membership and Inclusiveness of Group Boundaries Shape Helping Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 443-453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Hornsey, M.J., Oppes, T. and Svensson, A. (2002) It’s Ok If We Say It, But You Can’t: Responses to Intergroup and Intragroup Criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 293-307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Redfield, R., Linton, R. and Herskovits, M.J. (1936) Memorandum for the Study of Acculturation. American Anthropologist, 38, 149-152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Kashima, E.S. and Pillai, D. (2011) Identity Development in Cultural Transition: The Role of Need for Closure. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 725-739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] 李培林, 田丰. 中国农民工社会融入的代际比较[J]. 社会, 2012, 32(5): 1-24.
[20] 褚荣伟, 熊易寒, 邹怡. 农民工社会认同的决定因素研究: 基于上海的实证分析[J]. 社会, 2014, 34(4): 25-48.
[21] Cardenas, D. and de la Sablonniere, R. (2017) Understanding the Relation between Partici-pation and Identification: Two Studies with Latin American Immigrants. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 854-873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[22] Cardenas, D. and Verkuyten, M. (2019) Immigrants’ Behavioral Participation and Its Relation with National Identification: Perceived Closeness to the Prototype as a Psychological Mechanism. Self and Identity, 19, 719-737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[23] Cialdini, R. (2009) Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. HarperCollins, London.
[24] Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lee, A.T. and Novak, R.J. (2005) Individuality and Social Influence in Groups: Inductive and Deductive Routes to Group Identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 747-763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Thomas, E.F., McGarty, C. and Mavor, K. (2016) Group Interac-tion as the Crucible of Social Identity Formation: A Glimpse at the Foundations of Social Identities for Collective Action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 137-151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[26] Yang, H.T., Kim, J. and Heo, J. (2019) Serious Leisure Profiles and Well-Being of Older Korean Adults. Leisure Studies, 38, 88-97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[27] Son, J.S., Kerstetter, D.L., Yarnal, C.M. and Baker, B.L. (2007) Promoting Older Women’s Health and Well-Being through Social Leisure Environments. Journal of Women & Aging, 19, 89-104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[28] 王铭铭. 溪村家族——社区史、仪式与地方政治[M]. 贵阳: 贵州人民出版社, 2004.
[29] 牛耀红. 移动传播时代: 村民网络公共参与对乡村社区认同的建构——基于甘肃陇南F村的田野调查[J]. 社会学评论, 2017, 5(1): 36-46.
[30] 李利宏, 师宇. 义务与互惠: 乡村公共事务参与的新模式分析——基于山西省BS村全民义务清扫制度的个案考察[J]. 理论与改革, 2019, 2, 162-174.
[31] Adler, R. and Goggin, J. (2005) What Do We Mean by “Civic Engagement”? Journal of Transformative Education, 3, 236-253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[32] Mcbride, A.M., Sherrraden, M.S. and Pritzker, S. (2006) Civic Engagement among Low-Income and Low-Wealth Families: In Their Words. Family Relations, 55, 152-162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[33] 王乐夫. 论公共管理的社会性内涵及其他[J]. 政治学研究, 2001(3): 78-84.
[34] Haski-Leventhal, D. and Bargal, D. (2008) The Volunteer Stages and Transitions Model: Organizational Socialization of Volunteers. Human Relations, 61, 67-102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[35] Falk, I. and Kilpatrick, S. (2000) What Is Social Capital? A Study of Interaction in a Rural Community. Sociologia Ruralis, 40, 87-110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[36] Oberle, E., Ji, X.R., Guhn, M., Schonert-Reichl, K.A. and Gader-mann, A.M. (2019) Benefits of Extracurricular Participation in Early Adolescence: Associations with Peer Belonging and Mental Health. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48, 2255-2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] 刘镭. 村民的政治参与和文化认同[J]. 科学社会主义, 2012(4): 86-89.
[38] Neill, G., Morrow-Howell, N. and Wilson, S. (2011) Volunteering in Later Life: From Disengagement to Civic Engagement. In: Handbook of Sociology of Aging, Springer, New York, 333-350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[39] Anderson, N.D., Kroger, E., Dawson, D.R., Binns, M.A., Caspi, E., Damianakis, T. and Cook, S.L. (2014) The Benefits Associated with Volunteering among Seniors: A Critical Review and Recommendations for Future Research. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1505-1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] 杨春江, 李雯, 逯野. 农民工收入与工作时间对生活满意度的影响——城市融入与社会安全感的作用[J]. 农业技术经济, 2014(2): 36-46.
[41] 武玉, 方志, 刘爱华. “年龄–流动”双重视角下老年流动人口健康及影响因素——基于2017年全国流动人口卫生计生动态监测调查数据[J]. 兰州学刊, 2020(1): 157-171.
[42] 陈瑛. 同乡聚集对沿边少数民族外出务工的影响: 收入水平与地位获得[J]. 中国人口科学, 2019(2): 87-97.
[43] 祝仲坤, 冷晨昕. 住房状况、社会地位与农民工的城市身份认同——基于社会融合调查数据的实证分析[J]. 中国农村观察, 2018(1): 96-110.
[44] 史毅. 户籍制度与家庭团聚——流动人口流入地的身份认同[J]. 青年研究, 2016(6): 11-20.
[45] Verba, S., Scholzman, K. and Brady, H. (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
[46] Goerres, A. (2009) The Political Par-ticipation of Older People in Europe: The Greying of Our Democracies. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[47] Hustinx, L., Meijs, L.C.P.M., Handy, F. and Cnaan, R.A. (2012) Monitorial Citizens or Civic Omnivores? Repertoires of Civic Participation among University Students. Youth and Society, 44, 95-117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[48] Barnes, M., Harrison, E. and Murray, L. (2011) Ageing Activists: Who Gets Involved in Older People’s Forums? Ageing and Society, 32, 261-280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐