人际导向与不道德亲组织行为的关系：一个有调节的中介模型
Interpersonal Orientation and Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2020.1010172, PDF,    国家科技经费支持
作者: 孙晓玲：杭州师范大学心理系，浙江 杭州；卢美锋, 吴明证：浙江大学心理与行为科学系，浙江 杭州
关键词: 人际导向；上下属关系；道德认同；不道德亲组织行为；Interpersonal Orientation； Supervisor-Subordinate Guanxi； Moral Identity； Unethical Pro-Organizational Behaviors (UPB)
摘要: 目的：探讨个体的人际导向与其从事不道德亲组织行为(UPB)的关系，以及在这一关系中上下属关系的中介作用和道德认同的调节作用。方法：用方便抽样的方法选取372名企业员工参加本研究，采用人际导向量表、上下属关系量表、道德认同量表和UPB量表进行了测量。结果：1) 人际导向、上下属关系与UPB呈显著正相关；人际导向与上下属关系呈显著正相关；2) 上下属关系在人际导向和UPB关系中发挥着部分中介作用；3) 上下属关系在人际导向与UPB关系中的中介作用受到道德认同的调节。结论：人际导向是影响个体从事UPB的风险因素。人际导向以上下属关系为中介影响UPB，且这一效应仅出现在低道德认同的个体中。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the relationship between interpersonal orientation and unethical pro- organizational behaviors (UPB), and the mediation role of supervisor-subordinate Guanxi and the moderation role of moral identity in this relationship. Method: 372 subjects were measured by Interpersonal Orientation scale, Supervisor-subordinate Guanxi Scale, Moral Identity Scale and Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior Scale. Findings: Interpersonal orientation and supervisor-subordinate Guanxi associated positively with UPB. In addition, interpersonal orientation correlated positively to supervisor-subordinate Guanxi. Moreover, supervisor-subordinate Guanxi played a partial mediation role in relationship between interpersonal orientation and UPB, and the mediating effect of supervisor-subordinate Guanxi between interpersonal orientation and UPB was moderated by moral identity. Conclusion: The current study revealed interpersonal orientation as a potential risk factor influencing individuals’ intention to engage in UPB. This relationship was mediated by supervisor-subordinate Guanxi only when individuals were low in moral identity.
文章引用：孙晓玲, 卢美锋, 吴明证 (2020). 人际导向与不道德亲组织行为的关系：一个有调节的中介模型. 心理学进展, 10(10), 1467-1476. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2020.1010172

参考文献

[1] 陈默, 梁建(2017). 高绩效要求与亲组织不道德行为: 基于社会认知理论的视角. 心理学报, 49(1), 94-105.
[2] 郭晓薇(2011). 中国情境中的上下级关系构念研究述评——兼论领导–成员交换理论的本土贴切性. 南开管理评论, 14(4), 61-68.
[3] 李宗波, 陈红(2015). 上下属关系对员工知识分享行为的影响——组织认同和集体主义导向的作用. 管理工程学报, 29(3), 30-38.
[4] 梁漱溟(2011). 中国文化要义. 上海: 上海人民出版社.
[5] 刘慧, 王晓庄(2016). 上下级关系: 概念、测量、影响因素及其结果. 心理研究, 9(5), 69-75.
[6] 王辉, 刘雪峰(2005). 领导–部属交换对员工绩效和组织承诺的影响. 经济科学, 27(2), 94-101.
[7] 吴明证, 邵晓露, 孙晓玲, 李宁(2017). 服务型领导、道德认同与UPB的关系. 应用心理学, 23(2), 152-161.
[8] 吴明证, 沈斌, 孙晓玲(2016). 组织承诺和亲组织的非伦理行为关系: 道德认同的调节作用. 心理科学, 39(2), 392-398.
[9] 徐本华(2011). 人与组织道德匹配视角下的员工管理. 中国人力资源开发, (7), 5-8.
[10] 杨中芳, 彭泗清(1999). 中国人人际信任的概念化: 一个人际关系的观点. 社会学研究, (2), 3-23.
[11] 于维娜, 樊耘, 张婕, 等(2015). 宽恕视角下辱虐管理对工作绩效的影响——下属传统性和上下级关系的作用. 南开管理评论, 18(6), 16-25.
[12] 郑伯埙(1995). 差序格局与华人组织行为. 本土心理学研究, (3), 142-219.
[13] Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-Importance of Moral Identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423-1440.
[CrossRef] 
[14] Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
[CrossRef] 
[15] Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging Moral Cognition and Moral Action: A Critical-Review of the Literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 1-45.
[CrossRef] 
[16] Chen, Y. F., & Tjosvold, D. (2006). Participative Leadership by American and Chinese Managers in China: The Role of Relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1727-1752.
[CrossRef] 
[17] Cheung, M. F. Y., Wu, W. P., & Chan, A. K. K. (2009). Supervisor-Subordinate Guanxi and Employee Work Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 77-89.
[CrossRef] 
[18] Detert, J. R., Trevino, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral Disengagement in Ethical Decision Making: A Study of Antecedents and Outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 374-391.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-Member Exchange Model of Leadership: A Critique and Further Development. Academy of Management Review, 11, 618-634.
[CrossRef] 
[20] Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-Analytic Review of Leader-Member Exchange Theory Correlates and Construct Issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827-844.
[CrossRef] 
[21] Graham, K. A., Ziegert, J. C., & Capitano, J. (2015). The Effect of Leadership Style, Framing, and Promotion Regulatory Focus on Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 126, 423-436.
[CrossRef] 
[22] Hertz, S. G., & Krettenauer, T. (2016). Does Moral Identity Effectively Predict Moral Behavior? A Meta-Analysis. Review of General Psychology, 20, 129-140.
[CrossRef] 
[23] Law, K. S., Wong, C. S., & Wang, D. X. (2000). Effect of Supervisor-Subordinate Guanxi on Supervisory Decision in China: An Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11, 715-730.
[CrossRef] 
[24] Moore, C., & Gino, F. (2005). Approach, Ability, Aftermath: A Psychological Framework of Unethical Behavior at Work. Academy of Management Annals, 9, 235-289.
[CrossRef] 
[25] Mulder, L. B., & Aquino, K. (2013). The Role of Moral Identity in the Aftermath of Dishonesty. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121, 219-230.
[CrossRef] 
[26] Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Rubin, J. Z., & Brown, B. R. (1975). The Social Psychology of Bargaining and Negotiation. New York: Academic Press.
[28] Silva, F., Martinez-Arias, R., Rapaport, E., Ertle, A., & Ortet, G. (1997). Dimensions of Interpersonal Orientation: Cross-Cultural Studies Regarding the Structure of the DOI Kit. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 973-985.
[CrossRef] 
[29] Sosik, J. J., Chun, J. U., Ete, Z., Arenas, F. J., & Scherer, J. A. (2018). Self-Control Puts Character into Action: Examining How Leader Character Strengths and Ethical Leadership Relate to Leader Outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 160, 765-781.
[CrossRef] 
[30] Swap, W. C., & Rubin, J. Z. (1983). Measurement of Interpersonal Orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 208-219.
[CrossRef] 
[31] Thau, S., Derfler-Rozin, R., Pitesa, M., Mitchell, M., & Pillutla, M. M. (2015). Unethical for the Sake of the Group: Risk of Social Exclusion and Pro-Group Unethical Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 98-103.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B. (2011). When Employees Do Bad Things for Good Reasons: Examining Unethical Pro-Organizational Behaviors. Organization Science, 22, 621-640.
[CrossRef] 
[33] Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Unethical Behavior in the Name of the Company: The Moderating Effect of Organizational Identification and Positive Reciprocity Beliefs on Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 769-780.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Ward, S. J., & King, L. A. (2018). Moral Self-Regulation, Moral Identity, and Religiosity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115, 495-525.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Waytz, A., Dungan, J., & Young, L. (2013). The Whistleblower’s Dilemma and the Fairness-Loyalty Tradeoff. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1027-1033.
[CrossRef]