隐名股东的认定以及权利问题的研究
Research on the Identification of Dormant Shareholders and Rights Issue
摘要: 代持股作为商事习惯长期存在,由此引发的纠纷数量也日益增长。《公司法解释(三)》和《九民纪要》虽然在隐名股东显名化上做出了规定,但仍存在规则层级过低、规则不够细化等问题,导致司法实践中存在同案不同判的现象。本文主要探讨隐名股东的资格认定标准,隐名股东如何通过显名化保障其权利以及隐名股东具体权利问题。
Abstract: Proxy holding has long existed as a commercial custom, and the number of disputes arising from it is also increasing. Provisions on the naming of anonymous shareholders have been made in the Company Law of the People’s Republic of China (III) (2014 Amendment) and the Notice by the Su-preme People’s Court of Issuing the Minutes of the National Courts’ Civil and Commercial Trial Work Conference. However, there are still problems including low level of hierarchical rule and insuffi-cient refinement of the rules, leading to different verdicts in the same case in judicial practices. This paper mainly discusses the qualification standards of the anonymous shareholders, how do they protect their rights through naming, and the specific rights of anonymous shareholders.
文章引用:刘瀚屹. 隐名股东的认定以及权利问题的研究[J]. 法学, 2020, 8(4): 639-643. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2020.84090

参考文献

[1] 赵万一, 吴晓峰. 商事思维下的公司法实务研究[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2009.
[2] 李晓霖. 论股东资格确认——以有限责任公司为视角[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2013.
[3] 王利明. 合同法新问题研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2003.
[4] 熊博达. 论隐名出资人显名化要件[M]//《上海法学研究》集刊(2019年第24卷 总第24卷)——海南大学椰林法学团队文集, 2019.
[5] 伍崇新. 论有限责任公司隐名股东知情权[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南政法大学, 2019.
[6] 丛彦国. 股权信托合同法律问题研究[J]. 南方金融, 2015(5): 2-98.
[7] 余皓. 我国隐名股东的诉权保障研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 桂林: 广西师范大学, 2019.
[8] 丁广宇. 股权代持纠纷的有关法律问题[J]. 人民司法, 2019(17): 24.