生命性感知的研究述评
A Review of Research on Animacy Perception
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2020.1011185, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 向敬兰：西南大学心理学部，重庆
关键词: 生命性；生命体；非生命体；心智化；动因性；Animacy； Living； Non-Living； Mentalizing； Agency
摘要: 出于生存需要，人类视觉系统需要快速捕捉生命信息，以确定对方是否有危险性或者是猎物。而基于社交需要，人类也需要通过生命性的感知来判定客体是否是潜在的社交对象。研究表明，生命性可通过客体是否有生命信息或者是否有生物运动等线索来判定。本文将对客体生命性感知及其神经机制的相关研究进行回顾，并对未来的研究方向进行展望。
Abstract: To survive, the human visual system needs to capture life information quickly to estimate whether another entity is dangerous or it is prey. Based on social needs, human beings also need to judge whether the object is worth to have social interaction with. Previous researches showed that the animacy perception was carried on by judging whether the entity has life information or has biological motion. In this paper, we reviewed the research on animacy perception and its neural mechanism. We also discussed the future research direction.
文章引用：向敬兰 (2020). 生命性感知的研究述评. 心理学进展, 10(11), 1592-1597. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2020.1011185

参考文献

[1] 方富熹(1985). 3-5岁儿童关于认知生物和非生物的实验研究. 心理学报, 17(1), 64-72.
[2] Abdai, J., Ferdinandy, B., Terencio, C. B., Pogany, A., & Miklosi, A. (2017). Perception of Animacy in Dogs and Humans. Biology Letters, 13, Article ID: 20170156.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Abell, F., Happé, F. G., & Frith, U. (2000). Do Triangles Play Tricks? Attribution of Mental States to Animated Shapes in Normal and Abnormal Development. Cognitive Development, 15, 1-16.[CrossRef] 
[4] Balas, B., & Auen, A. (2019). Perceiving Animacy in Own- and Other-Species Faces. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 29.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Balas, B., & Koldewyn, K. (2013). Early Visual ERP Sensitivity to the Species and Animacy of Faces. Neuropsychologia, 51, 2876-2881.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Balas, B., & Pacella, J. (2017). Trustworthiness Perception Is Disrupted in Artificial Faces. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 240-248.[CrossRef] 
[7] Balas, B., & Tonsager, C. (2014). Face Animacy Is Not All in the Eyes: Evidence from Contrast Chimeras. Perception, 43, 355-367.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Barrett, H. C., Todd, P. M., Miller, G. F., & Blythe, P. W. (2005). Accurate Judgments of Intention from Motion Cues Alone: A Cross-Cultural Study. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 313-331.[CrossRef] 
[9] Bonin, P., Gelin, M., & Bugaiska, A. (2014). Animates Are Better Remembered than Inanimates: Further Evidence from Word and Picture Stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 42, 370-382.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Bowling, N. C., & Banissy, M. J. (2017). Emotion Ex-pression Modulates Perception of Animacy from Faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 71, 83-95.[CrossRef] 
[11] Calvillo, D. P., & Jackson, R. E. (2014). Animacy, Perceptual Load, and Inattentional Blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 670-675.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Chao, L. L., Haxby, J. V., & Martin, A. (1999). Attribute-Based Neural Substrates in Temporal Cortex for Perceiving and Knowing about Objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 913-919.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Connolly, A. C., Guntupalli, J. S., Gors, J., Hanke, M., Halchenko, Y. O., Wu, Y. C., Haxby, J. V. et al. (2012). The Representation of Biological Classes in the Human Brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 2608-2618.[CrossRef] 
[14] Downing, P. E., Chan, A. W., Peelen, M. V., Dodds, C. M., & Kanwisher, N. (2006). Domain Specificity in Visual Cortex. Cereb Cortex, 16, 1453-1461.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (1999). Interacting Minds—A Biological Basis. Science, 286, 1692-1695.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Development and Neurophysiology of Mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358, 459-473.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Gao, T., Newman, G. E., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). The Psychophysics of Chasing: A Case Study in the Perception of Animacy. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 154-179.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Gelman, R., & Spelke, E. (1981). The Development of Thoughts about Animate and Inanimate Objects: Implications for Research on Social Cognition. In J. H. Flavell, & L. Ross (Eds.), Social Cognitive Development: Frontiers and Possible Futures (pp. 43-66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[19] Gelman, R., Durgin, F., & Kaufman, L. (1996). Distinguishing between Animates and Inanimates: Not by Motion Alone. In Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate (pp. 150-184). Oxford: Clarendon Press.[CrossRef] 
[20] Gobbini, M. I., Gentili, C., Ricciardi, E., Bellucci, C., Salvini, P., Laschi, C., Pietrini, P. et al. (2011). Distinct Neural Systems Involved in Agency and Animacy Detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1911-1920.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Grill-Spector, K., & Weiner, K. S. (2014). The Functional Architecture of the Ventral Temporal Cortex and Its Role in Categorization. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 536-548.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Guerrero, G., & Calvillo, D. P. (2016). Animacy Increases Second Target Reporting in a Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1832-1838.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Hodges, J. R., Graham, N., & Patterson, K. (1995). Charting the Progression in Semantic Dementia: Implications for the Organisation of Semantic Memory. Memory, 3, 463-495.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Koldewyn, K., Hanus, P., & Balas, B. (2014). Visual Adaptation of the Perception of “Life”: Animacy Is a Basic Perceptual Dimension of Faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 969-975.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Legerstee, M. (1992). A Review of the Animate-Inanimate Distinction in Infancy: Implications for Models of Social and Cognitive Knowing. Early Development and Parenting, 1, 59-67.[CrossRef] 
[26] Looser, C. E., & Wheatley, T. (2010). The Tipping Point of Animacy. How, When, and Where We Perceive Life in a Face. Psychological Science, 21, 1854-1862.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Mori, M., MacDorman, K., & Kageki, N. (2012). The Uncanny Valley [From the Field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19, 98-100.[CrossRef] 
[28] Morito, Y., Tanabe, H. C., Kochiyama, T., & Sadato, N. (2009). Neural Representation of Animacy in the Early Visual Areas: A Functional MRI Study. Brain Research Bulletin, 79, 271-280.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] New, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2007). Category-Specific Attention for Animals Reflects Ancestral Priorities, Not Expertise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 16598-16603.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Santos, N. S., Kuzmanovic, B., David, N., Rotarska-Jagiela, A., Eickhoff, S. B., Shah, J. N., Vogeley, K. et al. (2010). Animated Brain: A Functional Neuroimaging Study on Animacy Experience. Neuroimage, 53, 291-302.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Scholl, B. J., & Tremoulet, P. D. (2000). Perceptual Causality and Animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 299-309.[CrossRef] 
[32] Schultz, J., & Bulthoff, H. H. (2019). Perceiving Animacy Purely from Visual Motion Cues Involves Intraparietal Sulcus. Neuroimage, 197, 120-132.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Sha, L., Haxby, J. V., Abdi, H., Guntupalli, J. S., Oosterhof, N. N., Halchenko, Y. O., & Connolly, A. C. (2015). The Animacy Continuum in the Human Ventral Vision Pathway. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27, 665-678.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Steckenfinger, S. A., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2009). Monkey Visual Behavior Falls into the Uncanny Valley. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 18362-18366.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Thorat, S., Proklova, D., & Peelen, M. V. (2019). The Nature of the Animacy Organization in Human Ventral Temporal Cortex. Elife, 8, e47142.[CrossRef] 
[36] Tremoulet, P. D., & Feldman, J. (2000). Perception of Animacy from the Motion of a Single Object. Perception, 29, 943-951.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Wheatley, T., Weinberg, A., Looser, C., Moran, T., & Hajcak, G. (2011). Mind Perception: Real But Not Artificial Faces Sustain Neural Activity beyond the N170/VPP. PLoS ONE, 6, e17960.[CrossRef] [PubMed]