不同情绪对网络利他行为的影响
The Influence of Different Emotions on Internet Altruistic Behavior
摘要: 本研究旨在探讨不同情绪对网络利他行为的影响。本研究采用单因素的实验设计,其中自变量为被试的情绪状态,有积极情绪状态、中性情绪状态、消极情绪状态三个不同的层次。因变量是被试在网络利他行为问卷上的得分,有四种不同的维度,即网络支持、网络指导、网络共享和网络提醒。本研究采用视频材料诱发情绪。结果发现:1) 相比于中性条件,在积极情绪状态下的被试更容易产生利他行为。2) 相比于中性条件,在消极情绪状态下的被试更容易产生利他行为。3) 在网络分享这个维度上,相比于中性情绪状态,被试在积极情绪状态下更容易产生网络分享行为;在网络指导这个维度上,相比于中性情绪,被试在消极情绪和积极情绪下更容易产生网络指导行为;在网络提醒这个维度上,相比较于中性情绪,被试在积极情绪下更容易产生网络提醒行为。
Abstract: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of different emotions on internet altruistic behavior. This study was designed using a single factor experiment, in which the independent variables were the emotional state of the subjects, with three different levels: positive emotional state, neutral emotional state, and negative emotional state. Because the variable is the score of the subject on the internet altruistic behavior questionnaire, there are four different dimensions, namely network support, network guidance, network sharing and network reminder. This study used video material to induce emotion. The results showed that: 1) Compared with neutral conditions, participants in positive emotional states were more likely to produce altruistic behavior. 2) Compared to neutral conditions, participants in negative emotional states were more likely to produce altruistic behavior. 3) In the dimension of network sharing, participants were more likely to have network sharing behavior in positive emotional states than in neutral emotional states; In the dimension of network guidance, participants were more likely to produce internet altruistic behavior under negative emotion and positive emotion than neutral emotion. In this dimension of network alert, participants were more likely to have network alert behavior in positive emotions than in neutral emotions.
文章引用:孔亚亚, 李晓密, 郑子偕, 董锋 (2020). 不同情绪对网络利他行为的影响. 心理学进展, 10(11), 1607-1617. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2020.1011187

参考文献

[1] 陈思思(2015). 大学生网络亲社会行为及影响因素研究. 硕士论文, 北京: 北京林业大学.
[2] 龚烨(2018). 积极情绪能促进网络利他吗? 硕士论文, 上海: 上海师范大学.
[3] 黄雪珂(2015). 大学生内隐、外显网络利他行为特点及其与大五人格、道德同一性的关系研究. 硕士论文, 郑州: 郑州大学.
[4] 蒋达, 王歆睿, 傅丽, 周仁来(2008). 内隐利他行为的实验研究. 心理科学, 31(1), 79-82+78.
[5] 柯青松(2011). 情绪和时间压力对偏好反转的影响. 硕士论文, 上海: 华东师范大学.
[6] 王亚芹(2017). 情绪对网络利他行为影响的实验研究. 硕士论文, 赣州: 赣南师范大学.
[7] 张卫东, 刁静, Constance J. Schick (2004). 正、负性情绪的跨文化心理测量: PANAS维度结构检验. 心理科学, 27(1), 77-79.
[8] 张晓贤, 桑标(2012). 儿童内疚情绪对其亲社会行为的影响. 心理科学, 35(2), 314-320.
[9] 章滢(2005). 大学生利他行为、移情能力及其相关研究. 硕士论文, 南京: 南京师范大学.
[10] 赵怡琳(2016). 动机与情绪对利他惩罚的影响及其毕生发展. 硕士论文, 上海: 华东师范大学.
[11] 郑璞, 刘聪慧, 俞国良(2012). 情绪诱发方法述评. 心理科学进展, 20(1), 45-55.
[12] 郑显亮(2010). 大学生网络利他行为: 量表编制与多层线性分析. 博士论文, 上海: 上海师范大学.
[13] 郑显亮, 张婷, 袁浅香(2012). 自尊与网络利他行为的关系: 通情的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 20(4), 550-551+555.
[14] 郑显亮, 祝春兰, 顾海根(2011). 大学生网络利他行为量表的编制. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19(5), 606-608.
[15] 中国互联网络信息中心(2018). 第41次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》发布. 中国广播, 297(3), 96.
[16] Baumann, D. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Kendrick, D. T. (1981). Altruism as Hedonism: Helping and Self-Gratification as Equivalent Responses. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 40, 1039-1046.[CrossRef
[17] Benenson, J. F., Pascoe, J., & Radmore, N. (2006). Children’s Altruistic Behavior in the Dictator Game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 168-175.[CrossRef
[18] van Steenbergen, H., Band, G. P. H., & Hommel, B. (2010). In the Mood for Adaptation: How Affect Regulates Conflict-Driven Control. Psychological Science, 21, 1629-1634.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.[CrossRef
[20] Winkielman, P., Berridge, K. C., & Wilbarger, J. L. (2005). Unconscious Affective Reactions to Masked Happy versus Angry Faces Influence Consumption Behavior and Judgments of Value. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 121-135.[CrossRef] [PubMed]