渤南洼陷北带埕南断裂带构造特征及形成演化
Structural Characteristics, Formation and Evolution of Chengnan Fault Zone in the Northern Belt of Bonan Subsag
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2020.1011102, PDF,  被引量    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 孙 波, 刘国宁, 黄秀芹:中国石油化工股份有限公司胜利油田分公司河口采油厂,山东 东营;渠继航*:中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院,山东 青岛
关键词: 渤南洼陷埕南断裂带断裂特征成因机制构造演化Bonan Subsag Chengnan Fault Zone Fault Characteristics Genetic Mechanism Tectonic Evolution
摘要: 利用三维地震、测井、岩心等资料,从渤南洼陷北部埕南断裂构造几何学、运动学及动力学特征入手,对埕南断裂西部、中部及东部不同段的地震剖面进行精细解释,精细划分出埕南断裂带不同段之间断裂结构特征及差异性,分析得到埕南断裂特征、断层活动特征,剖析得到埕南断裂成因机制,恢复得到构造演化过程。对该区油气勘探、成藏规律具有重要的意义。研究发现:埕南断裂是多期多段式活动断层的组合,剖面差异特征明显,由西段至东段依次呈上陡下缓的坡坪式、铲式同生正断层及板状正断层,一系列NW、NE、近EW优势方向断层相互切割,伴生、派生次级断层呈旋扭构造体系,表现为“网格化”的断裂系统。不同构造样式的断层在活动期次及活动强度的差异造就了现今渤南洼陷北部沿埕东凸起自西向东断层活动强度逐渐增强,活动期次逐渐变晚的特点,板式断裂发育在活动强度大区域,铲式断裂发育在活动强度中等区域,活动弱的地区则以坐椅式断裂为主,这与埕南断裂带剖面分段形态差异变化相吻合。不同时期的区域构造环境,控制着埕南断裂带构造特征及多阶段演化规律。新生代以来,郯庐断裂带具有明显的张扭特征,时而左旋,时而右旋;郯庐断裂带左旋走滑挤压到右旋走滑拉张应力场的根本性变革,是研究区复杂断裂形成的控制性因素。
Abstract: Based on the data of 3D seismic, well logging, core data and other data, starting from the structural geometry, kinematics and dynamics characteristics of the Chengnan fault in the northern zone of the Bonan subsag, fine interpretation of the seismic sections of the western, central and eastern sections of the Chengnan fault, the fracture structural features and differences between different sections of the Chengnan fracture zone are delineated, analysing the fracture structural features and fault activity features of the Chengnan fault. The genetic mechanism of the Chengnan fault is analyzed and tectonic evolution process is recovered. It is of great significance to the law of oil and gas exploration and accumulation in this area. The study found: The Chengnan fault is a combination of multi-stage and multi-segment active faults, with obvious profile differences. From the west section to the east section, there are successively steep slopes, shovel syngenetic normal faults, and plate-shaped normal faults. The faults in the dominant directions of, NE, and near EW cut each other, and the associated and derived secondary faults are a twisted structural system, which is represented as a “grid” fault system. The difference in the active periods and active intensity of faults with different structural styles has resulted in the gradual increase in the active intensity of faults from west to east along the Chengdong bulge in the northern Bonan subsag, and the gradual late active period. Plate-type faults are developing. In areas with high strength, shovel type faults develop in areas with medium activity intensity, and areas with weak activity are dominated by chair-type faults, which is consistent with the change in section morphology of the Chengnan fault zone. The regional tectonic environment in different periods controls the tectonic characteristics and multi-stage evolution of the Chengnan fault zone. Since the Cenozoic, the Tan-Lu fault zone has obvious characteristics of tension and torsion, sometimes left-handed and sometimes right-handed; the Tan-Lu fault zone is a fundamental change in the tensile stress field from left-handed strike-slip extrusion to right-handed strike-slip. It is a complex fault in the study area. It is a controlling factor of Tanlu fault zone sinistral strike-slip extrusion dextral strike-slip extensional stress field of radical change for the formation of the complex fracture in the study area.
文章引用:孙波, 刘国宁, 黄秀芹, 渠继航. 渤南洼陷北带埕南断裂带构造特征及形成演化[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2020, 10(11): 1032-1041. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2020.1011102

参考文献

[1] 刘家铎, 吴富强, 田景春. 胜利油区渤南洼陷沙四上段沉积环境分析[J]. 矿物岩石, 2001(3): 8-15.
[2] 孙锂. 埕南断裂带沙三段有效储层特征及成因[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2018.
[3] 刘岩. 济阳坳陷走滑构造特征及油气分布规律研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2016.
[4] 王艳. 沾化、车镇凹陷盆地结构特征分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 中国石油大学, 2011.
[5] 武奉霞. 埕南断层演化规律研究[J]. 内蒙古石油化工, 2014, 40(16): 119-121.
[6] 李克成, 蒋有录, 万涛, 刘魁元, 刘华, 郭富欣. 济阳坳陷埕东地区断层输导与油气运移特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(5): 685-692.
[7] 石先滨. 沾化凹陷埕南断裂带沙四段——沙二段沉积体系研究及有利目标体预测[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2011.
[8] 李梦萍. 渤南洼陷断层发育特征研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2017.
[9] 马晖. 济阳坳陷下第三系构造特征及其对层序的控制作用[D]: [博士学位论文]. 广州: 中国科学院研究生院(广州地球化学研究所), 2005.
[10] 张玥, 昝灵, 张坤. 渤南洼陷北部陡坡带沙四上亚段–沙三下亚段砂砾岩沉积特征[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2014, 36(1): 10-13+4.
[11] 谭俊敏. 埕南地区砂砾岩扇体储层的预测及效果[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2004(3): 310-313+246-369.
[12] 武恒志, 蒋琳. 埕南断裂带913区块沙河街组三段砂砾岩体成藏条件分析[J]. 成都理工学院学报, 2001(2): 158-163.
[13] 任建业, 于建国, 张俊霞. 济阳坳陷深层构造及其对中新生代盆地发育的控制作用[J]. 地学前缘, 2009, 16(4): 117-137.
[14] 畅通. 渤南北带沙河街组砂砾岩体沉积及储层特征研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2017.
[15] 罗霞. 埕东构造带构造演化及其对新近系油气成藏的控制[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(5): 14-18.
[16] 冯有良, 周海民, 任建业, 郑和荣, 苗顺德. 渤海湾盆地东部古近系层序地层及其对构造活动的响应[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2010, 40(10): 1356-1376.
[17] 周建勋, 周建生. 渤海湾盆地新生代构造变形机制: 物理模拟和讨论[J]. 中国科学D辑: 地球科学, 2006(6): 507-519.
[18] 朱光, 王道轩, 刘国生, 宋传中, 徐嘉炜, 牛漫兰. 郯庐断裂带的伸展活动及其动力学背景[J]. 地质科学, 2001(3): 269-278.
[19] 张奎华, 薛雁, 吴智平, 聂文龙, 胡加山. 济阳坳陷新生代盆地结构差异性及成因机制[J]. 地质科学, 2016, 51(2): 561-575.
[20] 张岳桥, 董树文. 郯庐断裂带中生代构造演化史: 进展与新认识[J]. 地质通报, 2008(9): 1371-1390.