花椒产量构成因素的通经分析
Path Analysis on the Constitute Factors of the Yield of Prickly Ash
DOI: 10.12677/HJAS.2020.1011135, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 王博恒*, 李菲菲, 惠文斌, 纪道丹, 宋亚辉, 李孟楼*#:西北农林科技大学,林学院,陕西 咸阳
关键词: 花椒树冠结构因子产量相关分析通经分析Prickly Ash Tree Crown Structural Factors Yield Correlation Analysis Path Analysis
摘要: 目的:确定花椒树冠结构因子与产量的关联性,为整形修剪和丰产管理提供基础。方法:采用相关分析和通径分析方法,分析X1树龄、X2干径、X3冠幅、X4树高、X5株营养面积、X6株标准枝数、株产量X7、栽植密度X8和单位面积产量X9调查值,利用直接和间接相关系数、R2和相关概率Zi值,评价Xi与X7和X9的关联性及其重要性。结果:结果表明,X1 (或X2)、X3、X4、X6与X7明显相关,各因素与X7的ZX6之间存在,27.36% > ZX3,25.23% > ZX2,17.63%和ZX1,17.33% > ZX4,13.98% > ZX5,−1.52%,但X1和X2同时存在时有相互抵触作用,据此建立了评估X7的简易模型Mp-1和Mp-2、及高精度模型Mp-3和Mp-4;结果还表明,X9对X1 (或X2)、X3、X4、X6和X7的依赖作用明显,各因素与X9的ZX7之间存在,28.53% > ZX6,23.89% > ZX1,21.60%、ZX2,20.32%和ZX3,21.48% > ZX4,17.25% > ZX8,7.66% > ZX5,−7.99%,但X8是支撑X9的基础,据此建立了X9的估测模型,以X7值为基础的模型为MG2-1,快速调查估测模型为MG3-1和MG3-2,高精度模型是MG2-3和MG2-4。结论:花椒树冠因子X3和X6是影响株产量的关键因素,X3和X6值的大小又与X1 (或X2)、X3和X4有关;树冠结构因子X1 (或X2)、X3、X4和椒园环境因子X8是影响花椒单位面积产量的关键因子。
Abstract: Aim: Determine the correlation between the crown structure factors of prickly ash and the yield to provide the basis for plastic pruning and high yield management. Methods: The tree age (X1), stem diameter (X2), crown width (X3), tree height (X4), plant nutrient area (X5), plant standard branch number (X6), plant yield (X7), planting density (X8) and survey value of yield per unit area (X9) were measured by adopting correlation and path analysis methods. Direct and indirect correlation coefficients, R2 and correlation probability Zi values were used to evaluate the relevance and importance of Xi, X7 and X9. Results: X1 (or X2), X3, X4 and X6 were apparently related to X7, and their correlation probability values can be ranked as follows: ZX6, 27.36% > ZX3, 25.23% > ZX2, 17.63% and ZX1, 17.33% > ZX4, 13.98% > ZX5, −1.52%, while there was a conflicting effect existing between X1 and X2. Based on the results, simple models Mp-1 and Mp-2 and high-precision models Mp-3 and Mp-4 used for evaluating X7 were established. Moreover, it also indicated that X9 showed striking dependency on X1 (or X2), X3, X4 X6 and X7, and the order of their correlation probability values was ZX7, 28.53% > ZX6, 23.89% > ZX1, 21.60%, ZX2, 20.32% and ZX3, 21.48% > ZX4, 17.25% > ZX8, 7.66% > ZX5, −7.99%, while X8 was the foundation to support X9. According to these results, the estimation model of X9 was constructed, and the model built based on the X7 value was MG2-1. The rapid survey estimation models were MG3-1 and MG3-2, and the high-precision models were MG2-3 and MG2-4. Conclusion: Prickly ash tree crown factors X3 and X6 are the key factors affecting plant yield, and the values of X3 and X6 are closely related to the structural factors X1 (or X2), X3 and X4. Furthermore, these structural factors and the garden environmental factor X8 are the crucial elements impacting the yield of per unit area of prickly ash.
文章引用:王博恒, 李菲菲, 惠文斌, 纪道丹, 宋亚辉, 李孟楼. 花椒产量构成因素的通经分析[J]. 农业科学, 2020, 10(11): 882-892. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJAS.2020.1011135

参考文献

[1] 刘学勤, 王加强, 桑芝法. 石灰岩山坡地花椒园效益初析[J]. 山西农业科学, 1990(12): 27-28.
[2] 郑重. 改变种植习惯大力发展花椒产业[J]. 农村实用技术与信息, 2002(11): 54.
[3] 徐思弘. 花椒巧种效益更高[J]. 农村百事通, 2010(11): 15.
[4] 罗广元, 李鸿杰, 杨斌. 西北山地花椒——农作物复合种植的生态经济效益研究[J]. 中国水土保持, 2017(4): 31-34.
[5] 圣长生. 科学修剪花椒树是提高产量的有效措施[J]. 河南林业科技, 1984(8): 29-30.
[6] 邓伟, 李辉秀, 高玉锦, 等. 不同修剪留枝比例对顶坛花椒产量的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2012(3): 168-172.
[7] 杨建雷, 杨双奎, 张晓军, 等. 花椒低产园放任树修剪技术研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2014(17): 96-97.
[8] 孟庆翠, 刘淑明, 孙丙寅. 配方施肥对花椒产量的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2009, 24(3): 105-108.
[9] 刘一文. 温州蜜柑树冠主要性状相关性的通径分析[J]. 浙江柑桔, 1987(3): 9-11.
[10] 黄守强. 柑橘产量与相关性状的通径分析[J]. 内蒙古林业调查设计, 2014(4): 114-115, 132.
[11] 欧毅, 郭爱民, 毛启才. 锦橙产量构成因素的通径分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 1993, 6(3): 85-90.
[12] 王丹, 周海庭, 任少雄. 柚单株产量影响因素的相关分析[J]. 福建果树, 2001(1): 7-9.
[13] 陈鹏, 何凤仁. 酥梨产量构成因素的通径分析[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 1989, 20(4): 65-70.
[14] 魏钦平, 束怀瑞, 辛培刚. 苹果园群体结构对产量品质影响的通径分析与优化方案[J]. 园艺学报, 1993, 20(1): 33-37.
[15] 邓伟, 李辉秀, 高玉锦. 不同修剪留枝比例对顶坛花椒产量的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2012(3): 168, 172.
[16] 张丽丽, 耿立格, 孙娟. 基于R语言的亚麻种质资源农艺性状相关及聚类分析[J]. 农学学报 2020, 10(1): 7-12.
[17] 林志伦. 基于R语言的一元线性回归模型在经济变量间的应用[J]. 济源职业技术学院学报, 2018, 17(2): 47-52.
[18] 王广鹏, 刘庆香, 孔德军. 板栗主要园艺性状与单株产量的通径分析[J]. 河北农业科学, 2004, 8(3): 60-62.
[19] 王广鹏, 孔德军, 刘庆香. 板栗单株产量的主要影响因素相关分析及通径分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(4): 1281, 1304 .
[20] 黄飞毅, 段继华, 雷雨. 实生茶树产量性状的相关性和通径分析[J]. 茶叶学报, 2017, 58(1): 17-20.
[21] 舒志明, 赵崇耀. 胡麻品种产量构成因素的相关和通径分析[J]. 山西农业科学, 1999(5): 19-20.