汕头市印刷行业废气中挥发性有机物污染特征及防治对策
Pollution Characteristics and Countermeasures of Volatile Organic Compound in Exhaust Gas of Printing Industry in Shantou
DOI: 10.12677/AAC.2020.104017, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 黄植鹏, 蔡芝霖, 陈育武, 林钊, 陈忆琳, 黄新羽:广东吉之准检测有限公司,广东 汕头
关键词: 挥发性有机物(VOCs)印刷行业防治对策VOCs Printing Industry Countermeasures
摘要: 本文采用了热脱附–气相色谱法测定了汕头市部分典型印刷企业废气中的挥发性有机物(VOCs)的产生、排放浓度,从原辅料、生产工艺、处理方式等角度剖析了汕头市印刷行业挥发性有机物的污染现状及特点,结果表明:汕头市印刷行业主要使用环保型原料,其中使用DJC无苯油墨产生VOCs浓度最低,平均为28.7 mg/m3;平版印刷方式较凹版印刷产生的VOCs浓度更低,平均分别为106 mg/m3和204 mg/m3;近半企业采用活性炭吸附或者UV光解 + 活性炭吸附的组合技术作为治理技术,但采用RTO炉焚烧技术处理效率最高,达95%以上。建议选用环保型原辅料、加强过程控制并针对废气特点采用适宜治理技术来系统解决印刷业VOCs污染防控问题。
Abstract: In this paper, Thermal desorption-Gas chromatography method was used to determine the concentration of volatile organic compound in the exhaust gas of some typical printing enterprises in Shantou. The pollution status and characteristics of the printing industry in Shantou were analyzed from the aspects of raw materials, production technology and treatment methods. The results show that the printing industry in Shantou mainly uses environment-friendly raw materials, and the concentration of VOCs produced by using DJC non-benzene ink is the lowest, averaging 28.7 mg/m3. The concentration of VOCs produced by lithographic printing is lower than that produced by gravure printing. The average is 106 mg/m3 and 204 mg/m3 respectively, and nearly half of the enterprises adopt the combination technology of activated Carbon adsorption or UV photolysis + activated carbon adsorption as treatment technology, but RTO furnace incineration technology has the highest treatment efficiency, above 95%. It is suggested that the pollution control of VOCs in printing industry should be systematically solved by using environment-friendly raw and auxiliary materials, strengthening process control and adopting suitable treatment technology according to the characteristics of exhaust gas.
文章引用:黄植鹏, 蔡芝霖, 陈育武, 林钊, 陈忆琳, 黄新羽. 汕头市印刷行业废气中挥发性有机物污染特征及防治对策[J]. 分析化学进展, 2020, 10(4): 115-121. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAC.2020.104017

参考文献

[1] 樊奇,羌宁. 挥发性有机废气净化技术研究进展[J]. 四川环境, 2005, 24(4): 40-49.
[2] Yan, Y.L., Peng, L., Li, R.M., et al. (2017) Concentration, Ozone Formation Potential and Source Analysis of Volatileorganic Compounds (VOCs) in a Thermal Power Stationcentralized Area: A Study in Shuozhou, China. Environmental Pollution, 223, 295-304.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 沈劲, 汪宇, 曹静, 等. 粤东北地区秋季臭氧来源解析与生成敏感性研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2017, 40(4): 100-106.
[4] 王倩, 陈长虹, 王红丽, 等. 上海市秋季大气VOCs对二次有机气溶胶的生成贡献及来源研究[J]. 环境科学, 2013, 34(2): 424-433.
[5] 杨利娴, 黄萍, 赵建国, 等. 我国印刷业VOCs污染状况与控制对策[J]. 包装工程, 2012, 33(3): 125-131.
[6] 邓拓宇. 广州市印刷行业挥发性有机物排放特征研究[J]. 北方环境, 2019, 31(9): 117-118.
[7] 窦德星, 于宏兵, 张艳芳, 王迪. 包装印刷业VOCs污染特征分析[J]. 化工环保, 2019, 39(3): 342-348.
[8] 生态环境部大气环境司/著. 挥发性有机物治理实用手册[M]. 北京: 中国环境出版集团, 2020: 81-93.
[9] 晁波阳, 高康宁, 延雄华, 申文斌, 等. 西安印刷行业挥发性有机物污染治理现状浅析[J]. 资源节约与环保, 2019, 5(1): 92, 99.