衔接理论在雅思写作中的应用分析
Analysis on IELTS Writing from the Perspective of Cohesion
DOI: 10.12677/OETPR.2020.24020, PDF,   
作者: 武玉珍：新东方重庆学校，重庆
关键词: 衔接理论；雅思写作；评分标准；Cohesive Devices； IELTS Writing； Band Descriptors
摘要: 雅思写作是中国考生的短板，造成该问题的关键因素之一是衔接手段使用不科学，导致其作文缺乏逻辑性。本文针对该问题，运用Halliday和Hasan的衔接理论，结合雅思写作评分标准，从照应、替代、省略、连接和词汇衔接这几个方面对考官范文中衔接手段的应用进行了分析，启发中国考生重视衔接方法和手段，对其形成一个系统的认识，并提出了相应的教学启示。
Abstract: Chinese candidates have failed to score well in the IELTS writing, which is mainly caused by the lack of logic in their answer due to the unscientific application of cohesive devices. To increase the discourse awareness of those examinees, and to prompt the development of a systematic approach to the usage of cohesive devices among them, this study, based on Halliday and Hasan’s taxonomy of cohesive devices, together with the IELTS Writing band descriptors for Coherence and Cohesion, makes a brief analysis of a series of sample answers in terms of cohesion from the following aspects: reference, substitution, ellipsis, conjunction, and lexical conjunction, giving relevant teaching advice.
文章引用：武玉珍. 衔接理论在雅思写作中的应用分析[J]. 国外英语考试教学与研究, 2020, 2(4): 203-208. https://doi.org/10.12677/OETPR.2020.24020

参考文献

[1] 2017中国大陆地区雅思考生学术表现及英语学习行为白皮书[Z].
[2] Johns, A.M. (1984) Textual Cohesion and the Chinese Speaker of English. Language Learning and Communication, 3, 69-73.
[3] 严萍. 篇章模式对英语写作连贯性的影响[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2007(30): 65-66.
[4] 题型介绍[Z/OL]. https://www.chinaielts.org/guide/sample_questions.shtml
[5] 雅思写作评分标准与示例[Z/OL]. https://www.chinaielts.org/guide/band_descriptors_writing.shtml
[6] Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R. (1976) Cohe-sion in English. Longman, London.
[7] 汪文娴, 孙梦芳. 对雅思写作中衔接连贯的探究性研究[J]. 教育界, 2007(12): 142-145.
[8] IELTS Made Easy: Step-by-Step Guide to Writing a Task 2 (2013) IELTS Buddy, 79-81.
[9] 丁言仁. 语篇分析[M]. 南京: 南京师范大学出版社, 2004.
[10] Morgan, M. (2003) Writing Skills for the IELTS Test. Shanghai University Press and Haiwen Audio-Visual Publishing House, Shanghai.
[11] Flowerdew, J. (2013) Discourse in English Language Education. Routledge, London. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations (2015) IELTS 10. Cambridge University Press, London, 166.
[13] University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations (2013) IELTS 9. Cam-bridge University Press, London, 168.
[14] Oshima, A. and Hogue, A. (2006) Writing Academic English. Pearson Education, New York.
[15] French, A., Cullen, P. and Jakeman, V. (2014) The Official Cambridge Guide to IELTS (Cambridge English). 396.
[16] University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations (2006) IELTS 5. Cambridge University Press, London, 165.
[17] University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations (2011) IELTS 8. Cambridge University Press, London, 163.
[18] University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations (2009) IELTS 7. Cambridge University Press, London, 167.
[19] 张艳艳. 词块输入对雅思写作效度影响的研究[J]. 北京: 中国海洋大学, 2009: 45-66.
[20] McCarthy, M. (1991) Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. CUP, Cambridge.