多隧道开挖诱发山体变形与应力数值模拟
Numerical Simulation of Mountain Deformation and Stress Induced by Multi Tunnel Excavation
DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2020.911129, PDF,   
作者: 孙 唯, 邢世波：西京学院陕西省混凝土结构安全与耐久性重点实验室，陕西 西安；傅少君：西京学院陕西省混凝土结构安全与耐久性重点实验室，陕西 西安；武汉大学，土木建筑工程学院，湖北 武汉
关键词: 多隧道；二维模型；COMSOL；数值模拟；Multi Tunnel； Two Dimensional Model； COMSOL； Numerical Simulation
摘要: 为了研究多隧道开挖过程中山体变形规律，借助有限元软件COMSOL Multiphysics建立了多隧道的二维模型，采用弹塑性方法及Drucker-Prager屈服准则。对多隧道穿越山体的情况下进行数值模拟分析，首先研究了隧道开挖前土体的应力状态；然后，进一步研究隧道开挖后土体的弹塑性行为。模拟过程中，将第一步中的土体当作弹性土，在第二步中加入土的塑性材料模型Drucker-Prager。在二维平面应变下求解，得到了隧道开挖应力主要集中在洞口周围，造成的土体变形主要位于隧道上方和左右两侧，变形主要以竖向地表沉降为主，关于隧道轴线对称两侧水平与竖直方向的变形规律相同。模拟结果表明隧道周围塑性区域的地表沉降和宽度，是预测开挖过程中加固材料用量的重要参数。
Abstract: In order to study the deformation law of mountain in the process of multi tunnel excavation, a two-dimensional model of multi-tunnel is established by using the finite element software COMSOL multiphysics. The elastoplastic method and Drucker Prager Yield Criterion are adopted. Firstly, the stress state of soil before tunnel excavation is studied; secondly, the elastoplastic behavior of soil after tunnel excavation is further studied. In the simulation process, the soil in the first step is regarded as elastic soil, and the plastic material model Drucker Prager is added in the second step. The results show that the tunnel excavation stress is mainly concentrated around the tunnel portal, and the soil deformation is mainly located at the top and left and right sides of the tunnel. The deformation is mainly vertical surface settlement. The deformation law of the horizontal and vertical directions on both sides of the tunnel axis symmetry is the same. The simulation results show that the surface settlement and width of the plastic zone around the tunnel are important parameters to predict the amount of reinforcement material during excavation.
文章引用：孙唯, 傅少君, 邢世波. 多隧道开挖诱发山体变形与应力数值模拟[J]. 土木工程, 2020, 9(11): 1234-1245. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCE.2020.911129

参考文献

[1] 王梦恕. 中国隧道及地下工程修建技术[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2010: 30-33.
[2] 杨晓泉, 袁伟, 李晓猛. 浅埋公路隧道沉降分析和数值模拟[J]. 江西建材, 2020(10): 107-109+111.
[3] 段军朝, 石九州, 王斐, 李柯. 基于ABAQUS大跨度双联拱隧道开挖的数值模拟分析[J]. 石河子大学学报, 2020, 11(6): 1-5.
[4] 魏华, 赵晓全, 王海军, 高华国. 邻近矿洞对隧道开挖影响的数值模拟分析[J]. 山西建筑, 2020, 46(9): 1-3.
[5] 杨笑天, 张朦朦, 梅宇. 浅埋软弱围岩隧道施工沉降回归分析及数值模拟[J]. 福建交通科技, 2017(3): 76-79.
[6] 李俊, 李泳伸, 王志杰, 贾刘强. 双联拱隧道开挖技术探讨[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2003(4): 20-24.
[7] 胡亮. 山岭隧道监控量测及围岩参数反分析研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2016.
[8] Vermeer, P.A. and Molle, S.C. (2008) On numerical Simulation of Tunnel Installation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 23, 461-475.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Do, N.-A., Dias, D. and Oreste, P. (2014) Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulation of Mechanized Twin Stacked Tunnels in Soft Ground. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 15, 896-913.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] 张忠伟, 朱传云, 姜清辉, 等. 引水隧洞爆破开挖对邻近建筑物的振动影响分析[J]. 爆破, 2004, 21(1): 82-85.
[11] 王梦恕. 中国是世界上隧道和地下工程最多、最复杂、今后发展最快的国家[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2003(1): 1-4.
[12] 李培超. 地面沉降变形非线性完全耦合数学模型[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(6): 665-670.
[13] 熊炜, 范文, 彭建兵. 正断层活动对公路山岭隧道工程影响的数值分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(增刊1): 2845-2852.
[14] Wang, J.F., Huang, H.W., et al. (2014) Void-Induced Liner Deformation and Stress Redistribution. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 40, 263-276.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Drosos, V., et al. (2008) Behaviour of Deep Immersed Tunnel under Combined Normal Fault Rupture Deformation and Subsequent Seismic Shaking. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 6, 213-239.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Oh, J., Daly, W.F., Rybansky, J., et al. (2012) Numerical Analysis of Shaft and Tunnel Design Adjacent to Station Cavern. Geo Congress, Oakland, 3285-3294.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Potts, D. and Zdravkovic, L. (2001) Finite Element Analysis in Geotechnical Engineering. Thomas Telford Publishing, London.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Schweiger, H. (2002) Results from Numerical Benchmark Exercises in Geotechnics. Proc. 5th European Conference on Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering, Paris, 4-6 September 2002, 305-314.

为你推荐