嵊泗海域浮游植物数量分布与优势种
Horizontal Distribution and Dominant Species of Phytoplankton in the Shengsi Sea Area
DOI: 10.12677/AMS.2020.74012, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 罗民波, 王云龙*, 杨杰青:中国水产科学研究院东海水产研究所,上海;简婷婷:中国水产科学研究院东海水产研究所,上海;上海海洋大学海洋科学学院,上海
关键词: 嵊泗海域浮游植物数量分布优势种 Shengsi Sea Area Horizontal Distribution Dominant Species of Phytoplankton
摘要: 通过2016~2017年嵊泗海域(30 ˚ 30 ' ~31 ˚ N、121 ˚ 30 ' ~122 ˚ 42 ' E) 4个季节现场调查,研究了嵊泗海域浮游植物丰度时空分布和变化动力学机制及嵊泗海域浮游植物优势种的生态学特征。结果表明:嵊泗海域浮游植物丰度的季节变化明显,春(96.00 × 10 3 cell∙m −3 ) > 秋季(51.72 × 10 3 cell∙m −3) > 夏季(38.23 × 10 3 cell∙m −3 ) > 冬季(20.04 ×10 3 cell∙m −3 ),丰度年平均为51.50 × 10 3 cell∙m −3 。冬季嵊泗海域近海高于外海,其他季节外海高于近海。全年共同优势种(优势度Y ≥ 0.02)有2种,为虹彩圆筛藻和琼氏圆筛藻,中肋骨条藻在春、夏和秋季为优势种。聚集性分析表明嵊泗海域浮游植物有明显的聚集现象。通过浮游植物丰度与环境因子的相关分析表明,冬季影响浮游植物丰度分布的主要因素是温度和溶解氧,其他季节浮游植物丰度与环境因子相关性不显著。浮游植物优势种适应性分析表明,虹彩圆筛藻和琼氏圆筛藻的适温性(7.5℃~32℃)比中肋骨条藻的适温性(16℃~32℃)强,在高丰度分布区,虹彩圆筛藻和琼氏圆筛藻温度和盐度适应范围比中肋骨条藻广,但春、夏季丰度比中肋骨条藻低。
Abstract: This article discusses the phytoplankton horizontal distribution and dominant species in Shengsi Sea Area. The ecological characteristics of phytoplankton and their adaptability to the environment were also considered. Oceanographic investigation was carried out in the Shengsi Sea Area (30 ˚ 30 ' ~31 ˚ N and 121 ˚ 30 ' ~122 ˚ 42 ' E) in four seasons from 2016 to 2017. It was found that the total abundance showed obviously seasonal variations. It peaked in spring with a mean value of 96.00 ×10 3 cell∙m −3 , followed by autumn (51.72 × 10 3 cell∙m −3 ). The lowest abundance occurred in winter (20.04 × 10 3 cell∙m −3 ). The mean density of phytoplankton was 51.50 × 10 3 cell∙m −3 . For the horizontal distribution, abundance in winter was higher in the near shore than in the off shore, and other seasons were higher in offshore than in nearshore areas. The aggregation characteristics of phytoplankton were obvious from multivariate regression analysis. Over the whole year, phytoplankton abundance showed a significant correlation with the water temperature. Three dominant species were observed in 4 investigated seasons, in which Skeletonema costatum dominated in winter, Coscinodiscus oculus-iridis and Coscinodiscus jonesianus in spring, summer, autumn and winter. Temperature and DO were found to be major influencing factors to winter phytoplankton abundance, while in other seasons the relationship between the environment and the phytoplankton abundance was not obvious. Comparing their adaptability, Coscinodiscus oculus-iridis and Coscinodiscus jonesianus can survive in a wider temperature range (7.5˚C ~32˚C), which enabled them to dominate in spring, summer and winter, while Skeletonema costatum survived in a relatively narrow temperature range (16˚C~32˚C). Coscinodiscus oculus-iridis and Coscinodiscus jonesianus had the wider suitable temperature and salinity zone than the Skeletonema costatum, while the later had the higher abundance in winter.
文章引用:罗民波, 简婷婷, 王云龙, 杨杰青. 嵊泗海域浮游植物数量分布与优势种[J]. 海洋科学前沿, 2020, 7(4): 77-88. https://doi.org/10.12677/AMS.2020.74012

参考文献

[1] Saifullah, A.S.M., Kamal, A.H.M., Idris, M.H., et al. (2019) Community Composition and Diversity of Phytoplankton in Relation to Environmental Variables and Seasonality in a Tropical Mangrove Estuary. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 32, Article ID: 100826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 张捷, 于波. 长江口至嵊泗列岛附近海域浮游植物与赤潮的监测研究[J]. 浙江海洋学院学报(自然科学版), 2001, 20(3): 213-216.
[3] 欧阳怡然, 陈逸华, 于波. 嵊泗列岛养殖海区浮游植物、赤潮生物的研究[J]. 浙江水产学院学报(自然科学版) 1993, 12(4): 257-264.
[4] 王弢. 宁波-舟山港海域浮游植物群落结构及季节变化[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 宁波: 宁波大学, 2013.
[5] 章守宇, 邵君波, 戴小杰. 杭州湾富营养化及浮游植物多样性问题的探讨[J]. 水产学报, 2001, 25(6): 512-517.
[6] 郑元甲, 陈雪忠, 程家骅, 等. 东海大陆架生物资源与环境[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2003.
[7] 王金辉. 长江口邻近水域外的赤潮生物[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2002, 2(21): 37-41.
[8] 李扬, 李欢, 吕颂辉, 等. 南麂列岛海洋自然保护区浮游植物的种类多样性及其生态分布[J]. 水生生物学报, 2010, 34(3): 618-628.
[9] 刘懂, 陈辰, 王莉, 等. 象山港海洋牧场示范区浮游植物的群落特征及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2016, 47(5): 1024-1032.
[10] Kenneth, S. (1991) The Large Marine Ecosystem Concept: Research and Management Strategy for Living Marine Resources. Ecology Applied, 1, 349-360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 李大鹏, 张硕, 石一茜, 等. 海州湾海洋牧场浮游植物群落年际变化特征分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2017, 26(2): 285-295.
[12] 刘佳, 苏艺, 韩晓庆, 等. 河北昌黎生态监控区海洋浮游植物多样性变化趋势研究[J]. 海洋通报, 2012, 31(6): 646-653.
[13] 王雨, 林茂, 林更铭. 福建近海不同海洋功能区冬季浮游植物群落结构的比较研究[J]. 海洋科学, 2010(2): 33-39.
[14] 李涛, 刘胜, 黄良民, 等. 广东沿岸不同海洋功能区秋季浮游植物群落结构比较研究[J]. 海洋通报, 2007, 26(2): 50-59.
[15] 国家技术监督局. GB/T12763.6-2007海洋调查规范[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
[16] 罗民波, 陆健健, 王云龙, 等. 东海浮游植物数量分布与优势种[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 12(27): 5076-5085.
[17] 赵志模, 周新远. 生态学引论[M]. 重庆: 重庆科学技术文献出版社, 1984: 108-119.
[18] 雷宗友. 中国海洋环境手册[M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 1988: 472-510.
[19] 王全喜, 曹建国, 刘妍, 等. 上海市九段沙湿地自然保护区及其附近水域藻类图集[M]. 北京: 科学技术出版社, 2008.
[20] 黄宗国, 林茂. 中国海洋物种多样性[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2012.
[21] 浙江省舟山海洋生态环境监测站. 日拉汉浙江海域生物资源种类名称[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2007.