脂蛋白(a)与急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死预后的相关性研究
Study on the Correlation between Lipoprotein (a) and the Prognosis of Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2020.1012492, PDF,   
作者: 张少续:青岛大学,山东 青岛;于波涛, 王 悦, 尹作民*:青岛大学附属青岛市中心医院,山东 青岛
关键词: 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死脂蛋白(a)特异性敏感度Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Lipoprotein (a) Specificity Sensitivity
摘要: 目的:分析脂蛋白(a) [Lp (a)]与急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)预后的相关性,为临床提供相关的STEMI预后的参考指标。方法:选取2018年10月~2020年5月在我院急诊病房住院就诊的STEMI患者460例,血清Lp (a)以四分位法分A组(<4.5 mg/dl,120例),B组(4.5~12.6 mg/dl,112例),C组(12.7~28.5 mg/dl,116例),D组(>28.6 mg/dl,112例)。分析4组患者的Lp (a)水平与患者的一般资料、MACCE的单因素与多因素COX回归关系以及特异性、敏感度的情况。结果:随着血清Lp (a)水平上升,空腹血糖水平、HDL-C水平明显较A组降低(P < 0.05),年龄、脑卒中病史比例、Apo B水平、LVEF < 40%比例明显大于A组(P < 0.05);四组患者的性别、BMI、吸烟史、高血压病史、糖尿病病病史、血脂异常、心肌梗死病史、PCI史、肌酐、TG、TC、LDL-C、Apo A的临床指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。四组患者在PCI术后2年MACCE发生率分别为9.17%、14.28%、13.79%、25.00%,且情况有统计学意义(P < 0.05),D组MACCE发生率明显高于A组、B组、C组(P均 < 0.05),但A组、B组、C组两两比较,无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。对单变量分析将P < 0.15或P值 > 0.15,但临床上认为与因变量关系密切的自变量进行多因素COX分析,LVEF < 40%水平是STEMI患者MACCE发生的保护因素,年龄、Lp (a)、冠脉多支病变和脑中风史是独立危险因素。远期MACCE发生率随Lp (a)水平每增加1 mg/dL而提高0.015倍。根据ROC曲线确定Lp (a)的临界值为28.50 mg/dL,Lp (a)预测行直接PCI的STEMI患者术后2年MACCE发生率的特异性为76.78%,敏感度为42.85%。结论:血清Lp (a)水平是直接PCI术后STEMI患者预后MACCE发生的独立危险因素,且随Lp (a)水平增加,累积远期MACCE发生率明显上升。
Abstract: Objective: To analyze the correlation between lipoprotein (a) [Lp (a)] and the prognosis of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), to provide clinical reference indicators for the prognosis of STEMI. Methods: From January 2019 to October 2020, 460 STEMI patients who were admitted to the CCU ward of our hospital were selected. Serum Lp (a) was divided into group A (<4.5 mg/dl, 120 cases) and group B by quartile. (4.5 - 12.6 mg/dl, 112 cases), group C (12.7 - 28.5 mg/dl, 116 cases), group D (>28.6 mg/dl, 112 cases). Analyze the Lp (a) level of the 4 groups of patients and the general data of the patients, the regression relationship between the univariate and multivariate COX of MACCE, and the specificity and sensitivity. Results: With the increase of serum Lp (a) levels, fasting blood glucose levels and HDL-C levels were significantly lower than those of group A (P < 0.05), and the proportion of age, stroke history, Apo B levels, and LVEF < 40% were significantly greater than those of group A (P < 0.05); comparison of clinical indicators of gender, BMI, smoking history, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, myocardial infarction, PCI, creatinine, TG, TC, LDL-C, and Apo A in the four groups, the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The incidence of MACCE in the four groups of patients at 2 years after PCI was 9.17%, 14.28%, 13.79%, 25.00%, and the situation was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The incidence of MACCE in group D was significantly higher than that in group A and group B. Groups and C groups (all P < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant comparison between groups A, B and C (P > 0.05). For univariate analysis, P < 0.15 or P value > 0.15, but independent variables that are clinically believed to be closely related to the dependent variable are subjected to multivariate COX analysis. LVEF < 40% is a protective factor for MACCE in STEMI patients. Age, Lp (a) multivessel disease of coronary artery and history of stroke are independent risk factors. The incidence of long-term MACCE increased 0.015 times with every 1 mg/dL increase in Lp (a) level. According to the ROC curve, the cut-off value of Lp (a) was 28.50 mg/dL. The specificity of Lp (a) for predicting the incidence of MACCE in STEMI patients undergoing direct PCI at 2 years after surgery was 76.78% and the sensitivity was 42.85%. Conclusion: Serum Lp (a) level is an independent risk factor for the prognosis of MACCE in STEMI patients after direct PCI. With the increase of Lp (a) level, the cumulative long-term MACCE rate increases significantly.
文章引用:张少续, 于波涛, 王悦, 尹作民. 脂蛋白(a)与急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死预后的相关性研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2020, 10(12): 3288-3295. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2020.1012492

参考文献

[1] 王慧, 尹良平, 程丽, 等. 单核细胞/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值与急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者短期预后的相关性研究[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2018, 10(3): 331-333.
[2] Miñana, G., Gil-Cayuela, C., Bodi, V., et al. (2020) Lipoprotein(a) and Long-Term Recurrent Infarction after an Episode of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction. Coronary Artery Disease, 31, 378-384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 叶子, 李勇. 脂蛋白(a)与心血管病临床研究的现状及展望[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2019, 47(12): 1013-1017.
[4] 中华医学会心血管病学分会, 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南(2019) [J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2019, 47(10): 766-783.
[5] Gao, M., Zhao, W., Zhang, Z., et al. (2018) Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Young Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 355, 544-552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 郭远林, 陈纪林. 2019年欧洲血脂异常管理指南对我国临床实践的启示[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2020, 35(2): 105-107.
[7] 谷阳, 于昆, 徐琢, 等. 脂蛋白(a)对非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者风险评估的价值[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志, 2018, 20(2): 149-152.
[8] 刘雅婷, 谷新顺, 张芳, 等. 前壁急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入术后主要不良心血管事件发生的影响因素[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2020, 34(5): 79-82.
[9] Gao, M., Qin, L., Zhang, Z., et al. (2019) Treatment Windows and Clinical Outcomes in Late-Presenting Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 358, 248-255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 孙西锋, 倪广臻, 潘祥坡, 等. 脂蛋白(a)对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者行经皮冠状动脉介入术后发生对比剂肾病的影响[J]. 中华高血压杂志, 2019, 27(3): 262-266.
[11] Haig, C., Carrick, D., Carberry, J., et al. (2019) Current Smoking and Prognosis after Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: New Pathophysiological Insights. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 12, 993-1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 王苗苗. 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心律失常病人短期预后的影响因素研究[J]. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志, 2018, 16(9): 1241-1244.
[13] 丁慧, 李朱萌, 王寅, 等. 急性冠状动脉综合征患者血清脂蛋白(a)及同型半胱氨酸水平分析[J]. 检验医学, 2019, 34(12): 1082-1087.
[14] Bessonov, I.S., Kuznetsov, V.A., Dyakova, A.O., et al. (2020) Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: 10-Years Follow-Up. Kardiologiia, 60, 982-988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] 尼菲拉·甫拉提, 菲尔凯提·玉山江, 袁玉娟, 等. 急性冠状动脉综合征患者外周血内皮细胞及红细胞微粒水平分析[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2020, 323(5): 68-72.
[16] 李彦明, 何瑞利, 钟晓鸣, 等. 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者PCI术后预后评价模型的建立与研究[J]. 重庆医学, 2019, 48(1): 71-75.
[17] Claudia, S.A., Livia, P.B., et al. (2020) Lipoprotein (a) Concentration, Genetic Variants, apo(a) Isoform Size, and Cellular Cholesterol Efflux in Patients with Elevated Lp(a) and Coronary Heart Disease Submitted or Not to Lipoprotein Apheresis: An Italian Case-Control Multicenter Study on Lp(a). Journal of Clinical Lipidology, 14, 487-497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] 温文慧, 匡泽民, 王绿娅. 重新认识脂蛋白(a)促进动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的作用[J]. 临床检验杂志, 2018, 36(3): 190-192.
[19] Benjamin, E.J., Muntner, P., Alonso, A., et al. (2019) American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics 2019 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 139, e56-e528.
[20] Verbeek, R., Sandhu, M.S., Hovingh, G.K., et al. (2017) Lipoprotein(a) Improves Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Based on Established Risk Algorithms. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 69, 1513-1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]