论我国义务教育质量监测系统的完善
Discuss the Improvement of the Quality Monitoring System of Compulsory Education in Our Country
摘要:
相比较美国的NEAP而言,我国义务教育质量监测起步较晚,通过对两者间监测对象和范围、工具开发、结果应用等方面进行比较分析,发现我国义务教育质量监测范围不够全面,监测工具开发的专业性与技术性有待提高,对于监测结果的应用亦不够充分。在现有监测基础上增加更多的监测学段,最重要的是注重提高监测工具开发的专业性和技术性以及加强对监测结果的分析与应用。
Abstract:
Compared with NEAP in the United States, my country’s compulsory education quality monitoring started relatively late. Through a comparative analysis of the monitoring basis, monitoring objects, tool development, and application of results between the two, it is found that my country’s compul-sory education quality monitoring has a positive effect on curriculum standards. The distinction from evaluation standards is not obvious enough, the scope of education monitoring is not comprehensive enough, the professionalism and technicality of monitoring tool development need to be improved, and the application of monitoring results is not sufficient. While paying attention to the curriculum standards, we have formulated qualified evaluation standards, and added more monitoring disciplines and monitoring sections on the basis of existing monitoring. The most important thing is to focus on improving the professionalism and technicality of monitoring tool development and strengthening the analysis and application of monitoring results.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
张咏梅. 大规模学业成就方法调查的开发: 理论、方法与应用[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2015: 349.
|
|
[2]
|
赵茜, 辛涛, 刘雨甲. 我国基础教育质量监测与评价的现状与趋势——第二届“中国基础教育质量监测与评价”学术年会综述[J]. 教育研究, 2017(9): 154.
|
|
[3]
|
罗贵明. 美国中小学课程评价: 理论、实践与借鉴[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2016: 230.
|
|
[4]
|
辛继湘. 从“对学生的评价”走向“为学生的评价”[J]. 教育测量与评价, 2013(7): 1.
|
|
[5]
|
2018年国家义务教育质量监测 数学学习质量监测结果报告[EB/OL].
http://www.eachina.org.cn/upload_dir/editor/20191120171458402.pdf, 2020-05-27.
|
|
[6]
|
刘建伟. 国际组织开展基础教育质量监测评估项目的经验及其启示[J]. 教学与管理, 2019(33): 114.
|
|
[7]
|
刘玥, 游森. 教育质量监测工具的公平性研究[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2019(8): 25.
|