轨道减振器超弹性本构模型参数优化
Parameter Optimization of the Track Damper Superelastic Constitutive Model
DOI: 10.12677/OJTT.2021.101002, PDF,   
作者: 杨 铭, 耿传智:同济大学铁道与城市轨道交通研究院,上海;上海市轨道交通结构耐久与系统安全重点实验室,上海
关键词: 轨道减振器超弹性本构模型有限元刚度正交试验Track Damper Superelastic Constitutive Model Finite Element Stiffness Orthogonal Test
摘要: 选用邵氏硬度为70和75的2组Mooney-Rivlin橡胶超弹性本构模型参数对剪切型轨道减振器垂向刚度进行仿真分析,得到2组参数的仿真结果与实测结果之间的误差分别为9.46%和14.43%,表明本构模型参数的选取对于仿真结果的精确度影响较大,需要进行参数优化。通过最小二乘法建立模型参数与橡胶硬度之间的函数关系,在橡胶硬度70~75之间取参数C10和C01各4个水平,设计2因子4水平的正交试验。通过正交试验法对轨道减振器垂向刚度进行仿真分析,得到了优化后的参数C10 = 0.707,C01 = 0.165。其仿真结果与实测结果之间的误差仅为1.01%,有效提高了仿真结果的精确度。
Abstract: A simulated analysis has been carried out on the vertical stiffness of the track damper by 2 groups of the parameters of the Mooney-Rivlin superelastic constitutive model, which are corresponding to the rubber hardness of 70 and 75. The relative errors between the stiffness values of the simulated analysis and the stiffness value of the actual measurement are 9.46% and 14.43% respectively, which shows that the parameters of the constitutive model have a significant influence on the precision of the simulated analysis and the parameter optimization is necessary. By the functional relation established by the least square method between the parameters of the constitutive model and the rubber hardness, 4 levels of C10 and C01 are selected respectively in the hardness range from 70 to 75 to design a 4 levels and 2 factors orthogonal test. By means of the simulated analysis of the vertical stiffness based on the orthogonal test, the optimized parameters are obtained, namely C10 = 0.707, C01 = 0.165. The relative error between the stiffness value of the simulated analysis and the stiffness value of the actual measurement is as low as 1.01%, which means that the precision of the simulated analysis is improved effectively.
文章引用:杨铭, 耿传智. 轨道减振器超弹性本构模型参数优化[J]. 交通技术, 2021, 10(1): 11-19. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJTT.2021.101002

参考文献

[1] 王之龙. 城市轨道交通噪声控制技术研究[J]. 环境与发展, 2018, 30(9): 87-90.
[2] 练松良, 刘加华. 城市轨道交通减振降噪型轨道结构的选择[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2003, 6(3): 35-41.
[3] 杨其振, 程保青, 刘道通. 北京市轨道交通大兴线减振轨道结构的选型设计[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2011(1): 58-60.
[4] 陈新华. 轨道减振器性能参数系统研究[D]:[硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2014.
[5] 谷爱军, 刘维宁, 张厚贵, 孙鑫. 地铁扣件刚度和阻尼对钢轨异常波磨的影响[J]. 都市快轨交通, 2011, 24(3): 17-21.
[6] 崔晓璐, 钱韦吉, 张青, 杨宏光, 陈光雄, 朱旻昊. 直线线路科隆蛋扣件地段钢轨波磨成因的理论研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(13): 114-118+152.
[7] 刘德宇. 橡胶减振器动力学建模及模型确认研究[D]:[硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2018.
[8] 李晓芳, 杨晓翔. 橡胶材料的超弹性本构模型[J]. 弹性体, 2005, 15(1): 50-58.
[9] Rivlin, R.S. (1948) Large Elastic Deformations of Isotropic Materials. I. Fundamental Concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 240, 459-490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Yeoh, O.H. (1993) Some Forms of the Strain Energy for Rubber. Rubber Chemistry and Technology, 66, 754-771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Ogden, R.W. (1972) Large Deformation Isotropic Elasticity—On the Correlation of Theory and Experiment for Incompressible Rubberlike Solids, 326, 565-584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] James, H.M. and Guth, E. (1943) Theory of the Elastic Properties of Rubber. Journal of Chemical Physics, 11, 455-481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Flory, P.J. and Rehner Jr., J. (1943) Statistical Mechanics of Cross-Linked Polymer Networks. Journal of Chemical Physics, 11, 521-540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Arruda, E.M. and Boyce, M.C. (1993) A Three-Dimensional Constitutive Model for the Large Stretch Behavior of Rubber Elastic Materials, 41, 389-412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 方建辉, 丁智平, 卜继玲, 黄友剑, 李飞, 白晓鹏. 橡胶减振支座动态性能仿真分析研究[J]. 湖南工业大学学报, 2014, 28(2): 16-22.
[16] 晏红文, 田红旗, 黄友剑, 陈灿辉, 杨军. 有限元法在机车车辆橡胶元件设计中的应用[J]. 机车电传动, 2007(6): 29-33.
[17] 卜继玲, 黄友剑. 轨道车辆橡胶弹性元件设计计算方法[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2010: 41-63.