论政府信息公开申请权滥用的行政认定标准——以司法案例为视角
On the Administrative Identification Standard of the Abuse of the Application Right of Government Information Disclosure—From the Perspective of Judicial Cases
摘要: 我国政府信息公开申请权滥用案频发,2019年4月修订的《政府信息公开条例》为申请权滥用提供了诸如“数量”、“频次”等认定因素,但此规定中还存数量、频次合理范围如何考量等问题。同时,行政机关在申请权滥用案认定中亦存诸如考量要素不统一、说理论证不充分、考察内容不合理等问题。为更好地维护申请人的政府信息知情权,合理地限制行政自由裁量权,当务之急系厘清申请权滥用的行政认定标准。而申请人主观具有恶意、客观行为不当、行为损害结果不具正当性可成为此标准的构成要件。
Abstract:
There are frequent cases of abuse of the right to apply for open government information in my country. The “Regulations on Disclosure of Government Information” revised in April 2019 provide identification factors such as “quantity” and “frequency” for the abuse of application rights, but is-sues such as how to consider the reasonable range of the number and frequency still exist in this regulation. At the same time, the administrative agency also has problems such as inconsistent con-sideration factors, insufficient theoretical evidence, and unreasonable content of the investigation in the determination of the abuse of the right to apply. In order to better protect the applicant's right to know the government information and reasonably restrict the administrative discretion, the most urgent task is to clarify the administrative identification standards for the abuse of the right to apply. The applicant's subjective maliciousness, objective improper behavior, and improper behavioral damage results can become the constituent elements of this standard.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
江悦. 论我国政府信息公开申请权滥用的司法规制之路[J]. 河北法学, 2018(10): 168.
|
|
[2]
|
沈岿. 信息公开申请和诉讼滥用的司法应对——评“陆红霞诉南通市发改委案” [J]. 法制与社会发展, 2016, 22(5): 23.
|
|
[3]
|
于文豪, 吕富生. 何为滥用政府信息公开申请权——以既有裁判文书为对象的分析[J]. 行政法学研究, 2018(5): 93.
|
|
[4]
|
肖洒. 信息公开缠讼司法规制的实效性考察[J]. 行政法学研究, 2020(3): 158.
|
|
[5]
|
湛中乐, 李烁. 公民滥用政府信息获取权的法律规制——兼评《政府信息公开条例》的修订[J]. 中国行政管理, 2019(4): 19-21.
|
|
[6]
|
章剑生. 政府信息获取权及其限制——《政府信息公开条例》第13条评析[J]. 比较法研究, 2017(2): 11, 21.
|
|
[7]
|
张鲁萍. 政府信息公开申请权的滥用及其应对[J]. 学术论坛, 2018, 42(3): 61.
|
|
[8]
|
王锡锌. 滥用知情权的逻辑及展开[J]. 法学研究, 2017, 39(6): 54.
|
|
[9]
|
吕艳滨. 日本对滥用政府信息公开申请权的认定[J]. 人民司法, 2015(15): 15-16.
|
|
[10]
|
王敬波. 谁有权申请——关于信息公开申请人资格的国际比较[J]. 中国法律评论, 2016(4): 47.
|
|
[11]
|
王锡锌. 政府信息公开制度十年: 迈向治理导向的公开[J]. 中国行政管理, 2018(5): 19.
|
|
[12]
|
蒋红珍, 王茜. 比例原则审查强度的类型化操作——以欧盟法判决为解读文本[J]. 政府论坛, 2009, 27(1): 121.
|