基于结构方程模型的高中生综合素质评价实证分析
Empirical Analysis on Comprehensive Quality Evaluation of High School Students Based on Structural Equation Model
DOI: 10.12677/AE.2021.111028, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 赵胜利, 张力芝, 苏理云:重庆理工大学理学院,重庆;喻小波:重庆长寿中学,重庆;钟妤玥:重庆渝高中学,重庆
关键词: 高中生综合素质评价指标体系结构方程模型High School Students Comprehensive Quality Evaluation Index System Structural Equation Model
摘要: 构建了高中生综合素质评价指标体系,建立了综合评价结构方程模型,通过问卷调查的方式从重庆市两所中学获取了相关数据,并依据调查数据对两所学校学生的综合素质进行了实证研究。结果表明:分别从身心健康,个人修养,社会实践以及学习状态四个方面来对高中生综合素质进行量化分析是有效的,四个方面中权重值最大的是学习状态,权重值为0.31。考试成绩只是综合评价的一个方面,考试总分高的综合素质得分不一定高,且综合素质得分高的也不代表四个方面的得分都高。综合各个方面因素对高中生综合素质进行客观的评价,这正是综合评价的魅力所在。
Abstract: The evaluation index system of comprehensive quality for high school students is established, and the structural equation model of comprehensive evaluation is established through the index system. In order to study this method, the relevant data are obtained from two middle schools in Chongqing by means of questionnaire survey. Based on the survey data and model, this paper makes an empirical study on the comprehensive quality of the students in the two middle schools. The results show that it is effective to quantify the comprehensive quality of senior high school students from four aspects, namely physical and mental health, personal cultivation, social practice and learning state. Among the four aspects, learning state has the largest weight value, and the weight value is 0.31. The examination result is only one aspect of the comprehensive evaluation. High test score does not mean that the comprehensive quality score is also high. Similarly, the high score of comprehensive quality does not mean that the scores of the physical and mental health, personal cultivation, social practice and learning state are high. The charm of comprehensive evaluation lies in the objective evaluation of comprehensive quality based on various factors of high school students.
文章引用:赵胜利, 张力芝, 喻小波, 钟妤玥, 苏理云. 基于结构方程模型的高中生综合素质评价实证分析[J]. 教育进展, 2021, 11(1): 174-182. https://doi.org/10.12677/AE.2021.111028

参考文献

[1] 马世晔. 从国外教育评价制度看我国基础教育评价体系的建立[J]. 中国考试, 2008(5): 13-18.
[2] 孟文娉. 国外高考招生过程中综合素质评价的经验及启示[J]. 教育实践与研究, 2013(5): 9-10.
[3] 周先进, 张睦楚. 高考改革: 高中生综合素质评价的“可为”与“难为”[J]. 全球教育展望, 2014, 43(7): 101-111.
[4] 崔允漷, 柯政. 关于普通高中学生综合素质评价研究[J]. 全球教育展望, 2010, 39(9): 3-8.
[5] 刘坚. 基于多元统计法的综合素质评价模型研究[J]. 曲阜师范大学学报, 2005, 37(3): 19-22.
[6] 邓志勇. 构建学生综合素质评价体系的策略研究[J]. 学校管理与发展, 2010(6): 16-19.
[7] 张东, 张恺, 等. 青少年综合素质的多层次评价[J]. 学术论坛, 2014, 8(8): 182-182.
[8] 郑晓丹, 崔玉平. 京沪浙普通高中生综合素质评价方案的对比分析[J]. 滁州学院学报, 2017, 5(19): 103-107.
[9] 陆炳荣, 杨大忠. 高考综合改革形式下高中生综合素质评价实践探索——以浙江省桐乡市高级中学为例[J]. 中国考试, 2018(2): 30-36.
[10] 王咸伟, 徐晓东, 等. 信息化环境下中小学生综合素质评价指标体系构建[J]. 课程与教学, 2019(1): 67-75.
[11] 李莉. 基于冰山模型探索高校综合评价招生模式[J]. 教育理论研究, 2016(21): 117-118.