任务线索范式在任务转换应用的综述
A Review of Task-Cue Paradigm Applying in Task Switching
摘要: 任务转换指的是个体在不同任务中灵活切换的能力，能够协助个体适应不同环境需求的变化，这种能力是执行功能的一种，任务转换能力反映了个体在认知灵活性的水平。在任务转换能力测量的实验范式中，任务线索范式是最常用的一种实验范式，这种范式通过在任务刺激呈现之前设置包含任务信息的线索刺激而实现，这种设置方式能够把任务转换过程区分为线索后的准备阶段以及任务刺激后的反应阶段，能够有效地区分任务转换过程不同时间变化的活动。本文将对任务线索范式在任务转换中的理论支持、实验设置、任务指标等几个方面进行描述。
Abstract: Task switching is the ability that individuals can change the ongoing tasks flexibly, which assists individuals to adapt the environmental changes. Task switching is also a kind of executive function that represents individual’s cognitive flexibility level. Within all paradigms of task switching, task-cue paradigm is the most commonly used one. Task-cue paradigm works through setting cue stimulus containing information about the upcoming task before task stimulus occurs. This procedure can decompose the process of task switching into two parts: one is the period after the cue occurs and another is the period after target stimulus occurs, which effectively distinguish the dynamic activation in task switching. In this paper, the theoretical support, experimental setup and task indicators of task clue paradigm in task switching will be described.
文章引用：张圣 (2021). 任务线索范式在任务转换应用的综述. 心理学进展, 11(1), 232-239. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2021.111026

参考文献

[1] Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting Intentional Set: Exploring the Dynamic Control of Tasks. In C. Umiltà, & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance Series. Attention and Performance 15: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[2] Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2006). Computational and Neurobiological Mechanisms Underlying Cognitive Flexibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 7186-7191.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Bertelson. P. (1967). The Time Course of Preparation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 272-279.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Biederman, I. (1972). Human Performance in Contingent Information-Processing Tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 219-238.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Brass, M., & Cramon, D. Y. V. (2004). Decomposing Components of Task Preparation with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 609-620.
[6] Braver, T. S. (2012). The Variable Nature of Cognitive Control: A Dual Mechanisms Framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 106-113.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R., & Burgess, G. C. (2007). Explaining the Many Varieties of Working Memory Variation: Dual Mechanisms of Cognitive Control. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in Working Memory (pp. 76-106). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.[CrossRef] 
[8] Braver, T. S., Paxton, J. L., Locke, H. S., & Barch, D. M. (2009). Flexible Neural Mechanisms of Cognitive Control within Human Prefrontal Cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 7351-7356.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Braver, T. S., Reynolds, J. R., & Donaldson, D. I. (2003). Neural Mechanisms of Transient and Sustained Cognitive Control during Task Switching. Neuron, 39, 713-726.[CrossRef] 
[10] Brunia, C. H. M. (1999). Neural Aspects of Anticipatory Behavior. Acta Psychologica, 101, 213-242.[CrossRef] 
[11] Cooper, P. S., Karayanidis, F., McKewen, M., McLellan-Hall, S., Wong, A. S. W., Skippen, P., & Cavanagh, J. F. (2019). Frontal Theta Predicts Specific Cognitive Control-Induced Behavioural Changes beyond General Reaction Time Slowing. NeuroImage, 189, 130-140.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Cooper, P. S., Wong, A. S. W., Fulham, W. R., Thienel, R., Mansfield, E., Michie, P. T., & Karayanidis, F. (2015). Theta Frontoparietal Connectivity Associated with Proactive and Reactive Cognitive Control Processes. NeuroImage, 108, 354-363.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of Goal-Directed and Stimulus-Driven Attention in the Brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201-215.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Draheim, C., Hicks, K. L., & Engle, R. W. (2016). Combining Reaction Time and Accuracy: The Relationship between Working Memory Capacity and Task Switching as a Case Example. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 133-155.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Jamadar, S., Hughes, M., Fulham, W. R., Michie, P. T., & Karayanidis, F. (2010). The Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Anticipatory Preparation and Response Inhibition in Task-Switching. NeuroImage, 51, 432-449.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental Set and Shift. Archives of Psychology, No. 89.
[17] Kantowitz, B. H., & Sanders, M. S. (1972). Partial Advance Information and Stimulus Dimensionality. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 412-418.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Karayanidis, F., Jamadar, S., Ruge, H., Phillips, N., & Forstmann, B. U. (2010). Advance Preparation in Task-Switching: Converging Evidence from Behavioral, Brain Activation, and Model-Based Approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 25.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Karayanidis, F., Mansfield, E. L., Galloway, K. L., Smith, J. L., Provost, A., & Heathcote, A. (2009). Anticipatory Reconfiguration Elicited by Fully and Partially Informative Cues That Validly Predict a Switch in Task. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 202-215.[CrossRef] 
[20] Kimberg, D. Y., Aguirre, G. K., & D’Esposito, M. (2000). Modulation of Task-Related Neural Activity in Task-Switching: An FMRI Study. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 189-196.[CrossRef] 
[21] Koechlin, E., & Summerfield, C. (2007). An Information Theoretical Approach to Prefrontal Executive Function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 229-235.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] LaBerge, D., Petersen, R. J., & Norden, M. J. (1977). Exploring the Limits of Cueing. In S. Domic (Ed.), Attention and Performance VI (pp. 285-306). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[23] Lavric, A., Mizon, G. A., & Monsell, S. (2008). Neurophysiological Signature of Effective Anticipatory Task-Set Control: A Task-Switching Investigation. European Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 1016-1029.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing Internal Constraints on Action: The Role of Backward Inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.[CrossRef] 
[25] Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of Processing Mode Prior to Task Performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 1423-1442.[CrossRef] 
[26] Monsell, S. (2003). Task Switching. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 134-140.[CrossRef] 
[27] Pereg, M., Shahar, N., & Meiran, N. (2013). Task Switching Training Effects Are Mediated by Working-Memory Management. Intelligence, 41, 467-478.[CrossRef] 
[28] Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric Explorations of Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[29] Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975a). Attention and Cognitive Control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55-86). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[30] Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975b). Facilitation and Inhibition in the Processing of Signals. In P. M. A. Rabbin, & S. Domic (Eds.), Attention and Performance V (pp. 669-682). New York: Academic Press.
[31] Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a Predictable Switch between Simple Cognitive Tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.[CrossRef] 
[32] Sakai, K. (2008). Task Set and Prefrontal Cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31, 219-245.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Savine, A. C., & Braver, T. S. (2010). Motivated Cognitive Control: Reward Incentives Modulate Preparatory Neural Activity during Task-Switching. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 10294-10305.[CrossRef] 
[34] Servan-Schreiber, D., Cohen, J. D., & Steingard, S. (1996). Schizophrenic Deficits in the Processing of Context: A Test of a Theoretical Model. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53, 1105-1112.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Sohn, M. H., Ursu, S., Anderson, J. R., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). The Role of Prefrontal Cortex and Posterior Parietal Cortex in Task Switching. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 13448-13453.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Sudevan, P., & Taylor, D. A. (1987). The Cuing and Priming of Cognitive Operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 89-103.[CrossRef] 
[37] Taylor, D. A. (1977). Time Course of Context Effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 404-426.[CrossRef] 
[38] Tian, Y., Klein, R. M., Satel, J., Xu, P., & Yao, D. (2011). Electrophysiological Explorations of the Cause and Effect of Inhibition of Return in a Cue-Target Paradigm. Brain Topography, 24, 164-182.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Travers, S., & West, R. (2010). Neural Correlates of Cue Retrieval, Task Set Reconfiguration, and Rule Mapping in the Explicit Cue Task Switching Paradigm. Psychophysiology, 45, 588-601.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Wylie, G. R., Javitt, D. C., & Foxe, J. J. (2005). Jumping the Gun: Is Effective Preparation Contingent upon Anticipatory Activation in Task-Relevant Neural Circuitry. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 394-404.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Wylie, G. R., Murray, M. M., Javitt, D. C., & Foxe, J. J. (2009). Distinct Neurophysiological Mechanisms Mediate Mixing Costs and Switch Costs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 105-118.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Wylie, G., & Allport, A. (2000). Task Switching and the Measurement of “Switch Costs”. Psychological Research, 63, 212-233.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Yeung, N., & Monsell, S. (2003). Switching between Tasks of Unequal Familiarity: The Role of Stimulus-Attribute and Response-Set Selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 455-469.[CrossRef] [PubMed]