动作操作促进联结记忆的认知神经机制
The Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Enactment Effect in Associative Memory
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2021.111031, PDF,  被引量    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 赵敏芳：惠州学院教育科学学院，广东 惠州
关键词: 动作记忆；联结记忆；动作操作；SPT效应；记忆提取；Memory for Action； Associative Memory； Enactment； SPT Effect； Memory Retrieval
摘要: 研究发现，相比语词任务(VT)，动作操作任务(SPT)可以促进随后的记忆，此现象被称为SPT效应或操作效应。以往关于动作操作促进记忆的证据多集中在项目记忆，最近的研究首次发现动作操作也能促进动作与物体的联结记忆。本研究拟综合使用ERP、眼动和两者同步技术，结合线索再认、联结再认与情景启动范式，考察SPT与VT条件下动作与物体的联结记忆的行为、眼动和神经活动差异，以期探究动作操作促进联结记忆的认知神经机制。本研究将深化动作记忆SPT效应和整合对联结记忆的作用的认识，推动联结记忆、动作记忆等领域的研究，为改善人类学习与记忆特别是联结记忆提供科学依据。
Abstract: Research have demonstrated that memory for actions is usually better following subject-performed tasks (SPT) than verbal tasks (VT) in recognition memory tasks. This superiority of SPT over VT is known as the “enactment effect” or the “SPT effect”. Previous evidence for this SPT effect in recognition memory is mostly based on item recognition. Recent research for the first time demonstrated that enactment can also improve associative recognition of verb and object. Our research aims to investigate the underlying mechanisms of enactment effect in associative memory. Combining ERP, Eye-tracking and the online combination of these two techniques, this research will examine associative memory by using episodic priming, cue recognition and associative recognition paradigms under SPT and VT encodings. This research will deepen our understanding of how enactment enhances action memory and also of the role of unitization in associative memory and advance both lines of research and theories of memory. This research also promises practical progress in improving human learning and memory especially associative memory.
文章引用：赵敏芳 (2021). 动作操作促进联结记忆的认知神经机制. 心理学进展, 11(1), 275-287. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2021.111031

参考文献

[1] 郭春彦, 高传吉, 李兵兵(2013). FN400 效应: 外显记忆测量中的概念启动加工. 心理科学进展, 21(9), 1521-1530.
[2] 李广政, 林文毅, 王丽娟(2018). SPT效应的编码机制: 项目特异性与项目关联性信息. 心理科学, 41(2), 292-297.
[3] 李广政, 王丽娟(2016). SPT效应的自动突显机制: 来自输出监测的证据. 心理学报, 48(3), 238-247.
[4] 刘泽军, 王余娟, 郭春彦(2019). 从整合的角度看联结记忆中的项目再认. 心理科学进展, 27(3), 114-122.
[5] 律原, 梁九清, 郭春彦(2015). 项目间语义可整合性对联结再认的影响——来自ERPs研究证据. 心理学报, 47(4), 427-438.
[6] 王丽娟, 李广政(2014a). 动作记忆: 记忆研究的新范畴. 心理科学进展, 22(6), 953-958.
[7] 王丽娟, 李广政(2014b). 动作记忆SPT效应的理论探讨. 心理科学, 37(4), 998-1001.
[8] 赵敏芳(2015). 整合编码对联结再认的影响及其认知神经机制. 博士学位论文, 北京: 中国科学院研究生院.
[9] 赵敏芳, 傅小兰, 李开云, Zimmer, H. D. (2020). 动作操作与怪异性对联结记忆的影响. 心理与行为研究, 18(2), 145-152.
[10] 郑志伟, 李娟, 肖凤秋(2015). 熟悉性能够支持联结记忆: 一体化编码的作用. 心理科学进展, 23(2), 202-212.
[11] 周宗泽, 贺金波, 郭永玉(2013). 记忆生存优势: 心理机制及进化心理学解释. 心理研究, 6(2), 3-8.
[12] Addis, D. R., Giovanello, K. S., Vu, M.-A., & Schacter, D. L. (2014). Age-Related Changes in Prefrontal and Hippocampal Contributions to Relational Encoding. NeuroImage, 84, 19-26.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Aly, M., Knight, R. T., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2010). Faces Are Special but Not Too Special: Spared Face Recognition in Amnesia Is Based on Familiarity. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3941-3948.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Bäckman, L., & Nilsson, L. G. (1984). Aging Effects in Free Recall: An Exception to the Rule. Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research and Applications, 3, 53-69.
[15] Bader, R., Mecklinger, A., Hoppstädter, M., & Meyer, P. (2010). Recognition Memory for One-Trial-Unitized Word Pairs: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials. NeuroImage, 50, 772-781.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Cabeza, R. (2006). Prefrontal and Medial Temporal Lobe Contributions to Relational Memory in Young and Older Adults. In H. D. Zimmer, A. Mecklinger, & U. Lindenberger (Eds.), Handbook of Binding and Memory: Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience (pp. 315-338). Oxford: Oxford University Press.[CrossRef] 
[17] Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the Generality of Some Memory Laws. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22, 267-281.[CrossRef] 
[18] DeMaster, D., Pathman, T., & Ghetti, S. (2013). Development of Memory for Spatial Context: Hippocampal and Cortical Contributions. Neuropsychologia, 51, 2415-2426.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Diana, R. A., Yonelinas, A. P., & Ranganath, C. (2007). Imaging Recollection and Familiarity in the Medial Temporal Lobe: A Three-Component Model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 379-386.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Donaldson, D. I., & Rugg, M. D. (1998). Recognition Memory for New Associations: Electrophysiological Evidence for the Role of Recollection. Neuropsychologia, 36, 377-395.[CrossRef] 
[21] Donaldson, D. I., & Rugg, M. D. (1999). Event-Related Potential Studies of Associative Recognition and Recall: Electrophysiological Evidence for Context Dependent Retrieval Processes. Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 1-16.[CrossRef] 
[22] Engelkamp, J. (1998). Memory for Actions. Hove: Psychology Press.
[23] Engelkamp, J., & Dehn, D. M. (1997). Strategy and Consciousness in Remembering Subject-Performed Actions. Sprache & Kognition, 16, Article ID: 94109.
[24] Engelkamp, J., & Jahn, P. (2003). Lexical, Conceptual and Motor Information in Memory for Action Phrases: A Multi-System Account. Acta Psychologica, 113, 147-165.[CrossRef] 
[25] Engelkamp, J., & Perrig, W. (1986). Differential Effects of Imaginal and Motor Encoding on the Recall of Action Phrases. Archiv für Psychologie, 138, 261-273.
[26] Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1984). Motor Programme Information as a Separable Memory Unit. Psychological Research, 46, 283-299.[CrossRef] 
[27] Engelkamp, J., Seiler, K. H., & Zimmer, H. D. (2004). Memory for Actions: Item and Relational Information in Categorized Lists. Psychological Research, 69, 1-10.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Engelkamp, J., Seiler, K. H., & Zimmer, H. D. (2005). Differential Relational Encoding of Categorical Information in Memory for Action Events. Memory and Cognition, 33, 371-379.[CrossRef] 
[29] Engelkamp, J., Zimmer, H. D., & Biegelmann, U. E. (1993). Bizarreness Effects in Verbal Tasks and Subject-Performed Tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 393-415.[CrossRef] 
[30] Feyereisen, P. (2009). Enactment Effects and Integration Processes in Younger and Older Adults’ Memory for Actions. Memory, 17, 374-385.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Foley, M. A., & Ratner, H. H. (2001). Structures in Activity Memory. Memory for Action: A Distinct Form of Episodic Memory? In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for Action: A Distinct Form of Episodic Memory? (pp. 112-135). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[32] Giovanello, K. S., & Schacter, D. L. (2012). Reduced Specificity of Hippocampal and Posterior Ventrolateral Prefrontal Activity during Relational Retrieval in Normal Aging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 159-170.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1989). Unitization and Grouping Mediate Dissociations in Memory for New Associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 930-940.[CrossRef] 
[34] Heil, M., Rolke, B., Engelkamp, J., Rosler, F., Ozcan, M., & Hennighausen, E. (1999). Event-Related Brain Potentials during Recognition of Ordinary and Bizarre Action Phrases Following Verbal and Subject-Performed Encoding Conditions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 261-280.[CrossRef] 
[35] Holdstock, J. S., Mayes, A. R., Gong, Q. Y., Roberts, N., & Kapur, N. (2005). Item Recognition Is Less Impaired than Recall and Associative Recognition in a Patient with Selective Hippocampal Damage. Hippocampus, 15, 203-215.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and Item-Specific Information in Memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 497-514.[CrossRef] 
[37] Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A Process Dissociation Framework: Separating Automatic from Intentional Uses of Memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.[CrossRef] 
[38] Kormi-Nouri, R. (1995). The Nature of Memory for Action Events: An Episodic Integration View. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 337-363.[CrossRef] 
[39] Kormi-Nouri, R., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1998). The Role of Integration in Recognition Failure and Action Memory. Memory and Cognition, 26, 681-691.[CrossRef] 
[40] Kriukova, O., Bridger, E., & Mecklinger, A. (2013). Semantic Relations Differentially Impact Associative Recognition Memory: Electrophysiological Evidence. Brain and Cognition, 83, Article ID: 93103.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Leynes, P. A., & Bink, M. L. (2002). Did I Do That? An ERP Study of Memory for Performed and Planned Actions. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 45, 197-210.[CrossRef] 
[42] Leynes, P. A., & Kakadia, B. (2013). Variations in Retrieval Monitoring during Action Memory Judgments: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials (ERPs). International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87, 189-199.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Leynes, P. A., Crawford, J., & Bink, M. (2005). Interrupted Actions Affect Output Monitoring and Event-Related Potentials (ERPs). Memory, 13, 759-772.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Leynes, P. A., Grey, J. A., & Crawford, J. T. (2006). Event-Related Potential (ERP) Evidence for Sensory-Based Action Memories. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 193-202.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Li, G., & Wang, L. (2015). The Effects of Encoding Modality and Object Presence on Event-Based Prospective Memory in Seven- to Nine-Year-Old Children. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 725-738.[CrossRef] 
[46] Li, R., Zhu, X., Yin, S., Niu, Y., Zheng, Z., Huang, X., Wang, B., & Li, J. (2014). Multimodal Intervention in Older Adults Improves Resting-State Functional Connectivity between the Medial Prefrontal Cortex and Medial Temporal Lobe. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, Article 39.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[47] Liesefeld, H. R., Liesefeld, A. M., & Zimmer, H. D. (2016). Recollection Is Delayed under Changed Viewing Conditions: A Graded Effect on the Latency of the Late Posterior Component. Psychophysiology, 53, 1811-1822.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[48] Masumoto, K., Yamaguchi, M., Sutani, K., Tsuneto, S., Fujita, A., & Tonoike, M. (2006). Reactivation of Physical Motor Information in the Memory of Action Events. Brain Research, 1101, 102-109.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[49] Mayes, A., Montaldi, D., & Migo, E. (2007). Associative Memory and the Medial Temporal Lobes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 126-135.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[50] McDaniel, M., & Bugg, J. (2008). Instability in Memory Phenomena: A Common Puzzle and a Unifying Explanation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 237-255.[CrossRef] 
[51] Mecklenbräuker, S., Steffens, M. C., Jelenec, P., & Goergens, N. K. (2011). Interactive Context Integration in Children? Evidence from an Action Memory Study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 747-761.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[52] Mecklinger, A. (2000). Interfacing Mind and Brain: A Neurocognitive Model of Recognition Memory. Psychophysiology, 37, 565-582.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[53] Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2000). Adult Age Differences in Memory Performance: Tests of an Associative Deficit Hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1170-1187.[CrossRef] 
[54] Nilsson, L.-G. (2000). Remembering Actions and Words. In F. I. M. Craik, & E. Tulving (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Memory (pp. 137-148). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[55] Nilsson, L.-G., & Kormi-Nouri, R. (2001). What Is the Meaning of a Memory-System Approach. In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for Action: A Distinct Form of Episodic Memory? (pp. 136-143). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[56] Norman, D. A. (1981). Categorization of Action Slips. Psychological Review, 88, 1-15.[CrossRef] 
[57] Nyberg, L., Petersson, K. M., Nilsson, L.-G., Sandblom, J., Åberg, C., & Ingvar, M. (2001). Reactivation of Motor Brain Areas during Explicit Memory for Actions. NeuroImage, 14, 521-528.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[58] Old, S. R., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2008). Differential Effects of Age on Item and Associative Measures of Memory: A Meta-Analysis. Psychology and Aging, 23, 104-118.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[59] Opitz, B. (2010). Neural Binding Mechanisms in Learning and Memory. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 1036-1046.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[60] Paller, K. A., Voss, J. L., & Boehm, S. G. (2007). Validating Neural Correlates of Familiarity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 243-250.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[61] Rhodes, S. M., & Donaldson, D. (2008). Electrophysiological Evidence for the Effect of Interactive Imagery on Episodic Memory: Encouraging Familiarity for Non-Unitized Stimuli during Associative Recognition. NeuroImage, 39, 873-884.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[62] Roediger, H. L., & Zaromb, F. M. (2010). Memory for Actions: How Different? In L. Bäckman, & L. Nyberg (Eds.), Memory, Aging and the Brain—A Festschrift in Honour of Lars-Göran Nilsson (pp. 24-52). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
[63] Rugg, M. D., & Curran, T. (2007). Event-Related Potentials and Recognition Memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 251-257.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[64] Senkfor, A. J. (2008). Memory for Pantomimed Actions versus Actions with Real Objects. Cortex, 44, 820-833.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[65] Senkfor, A. J., Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (2002). Episodic Action Memory for Real Objects: An ERP Investigation with Perform, Watch, and Imagine Action Encoding Tasks versus a Non-Action Encoding Task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 402-419.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[66] Senkfor, A. J., Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (2008). Enactment versus Conceptual Encoding: Equivalent Item Memory but Different Source Memory. Cortex, 44, 649-664.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[67] Steffens, M. C., Jelenec, P., & Mecklenbräuker, S. (2009). Decomposing the Memory Processes Contributing to Enactment Effects by Multinomial Modelling. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 61-83.[CrossRef] 
[68] Steffens, M. C., Jelenec, P., Mecklenbräuker, S., & Marie Thompson, E. (2006). Decomposing Retrieval and Integration in Memory for Actions: A Multinomial Modeling Approach. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 557-576.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[69] Tibon, R., Gronau, N., Scheuplein, A.-L., Mecklinger, A., & Levy, D. A. (2014). Associative Recognition Processes Are Modulated by the Semantic Unitizability of Memoranda. Brain and Cognition, 92, 1931.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[70] Troyer, A. K., Murphy, K. J., Anderson, N. D., Craik, F. I. M., Moscovitch, M., Maione, A., & Gao, F. Q. (2012). Associative Recognition in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Relationship to Hippocampal Volume and Apolipoprotein E. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3721-3728.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[71] Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and Consciousness. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 26, 1-12.[CrossRef] 
[72] Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517.[CrossRef] 
[73] Yonelinas, A., Kroll, N., Dobbins, I., & Soltani, M. (1999). Recognition Memory for Faces: When Familiarity Supports Associative Recognition Judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 654-661.[CrossRef] 
[74] Zhao, M.-F., Zimmer, H. D., Fu, X., & Zheng, Z. (2020). Unitization of Internal and External Features Contributes to Associative Recognition for Faces: Evidence from Modulations of the FN400. Brain Research, 1748, Article ID: 147077.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[75] Zhao, M.-F., Zimmer, H. D., Zhou, X., & Fu, X. (2016). Enactment Supports Unitisation of Action Components and Enhances the Contribution of Familiarity to Associative Recognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28, 932-947.[CrossRef] 
[76] Zheng, Z., Li, J., Xiao, F., Ren, W., & He, R. (2016). Unitization Improves Source Memory in Older Adults: An Event-Related Potential Study. Neuropsychologia, 89, 232-244.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[77] Zimmer, H. D. (1986). The Memory Trace of Semantic or Motor Processing. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human Memory and Cognitive Capabilities (pp. 215-223). Amsterdam: North Holland.
[78] Zimmer, H. D. (2001). Why Do Actions Speaker Louder than Words? Action Memory as a Variant of Encoding Manipulations or as a Result of a Specific Memory System? In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for Action. A Distinct Form of Episodic Memory? (pp. 151-198). New York: Oxford University Press.
[79] Zimmer, H. D., & Cohen, R. L. (2001). Remembering Actions: A Specific Type of Memory? In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for Action: A Distinct Form of Episodic Memory? (pp. 3-24). New York: Oxford University Press.
[80] Zimmer, H. D., & Ecker, U. K. (2010). Remembering Perceptual Features Unequally Bound in Object and Episodic Tokens: Neural Mechanisms and Their Electrophysiological Correlates. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 1066-1079.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[81] Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1985). An Attempt to Distinguish between Kinematic and Motor Memory Components. Acta Psychologica, 58, 81-106.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[82] Zimmer, H. D., Helstrup, T., & Engelkamp, J. (2000). Pop-Out into Memory: A Retrieval Mechanism That Is Enhanced with the Recall of Subject-Performed Tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 658-670.[CrossRef] 
[83] Zimmer, H. D., Helstrup, T., Nilsson, L.-G., Helstrup, T., & Magnussen, S. (2007). Action-Events in Everyday Life and Their Remembering. In T. Helstrup, & S. Magnussen (Eds.), Everyday Memory (pp. 57-92). London: Psychology Press-Routledge.