2015~2019年高考数学全国卷和江苏卷的比较研究
A Comparative Study Based on the National Volume (Mathematics) and Jiangsu Volume (Mathematics) from 2015 to 2019
摘要: 江苏省于2019年4月23日发布高考新方案,方案中指出数学科目将不再由江苏本省自主命题,回归全国高考,统一采用全国卷。这一方案的颁布引起了社会各界的广泛关注,也对已经适应多年江苏卷的教师来说是一个巨大的挑战,根据高考新方案的要求,以2015~2019年全国I卷(理)和江苏卷(理)为研究对象,从考察内容、能力要求和整体难度三个方面比较分析两种试卷类别的异同。研究结果如下:全国卷知识内容的侧重程度和考察形式与江苏卷有一些差异;全国卷较江苏卷更加注重运算求解能力的考察;全国卷较江苏卷更加注重空间想象的考察;全国卷和江苏卷都注重基础知识和主干内容的考察。
Abstract: On April 23, 2019, the new college entrance examination plan of Jiangsu Province was released, in which it was pointed out that mathematics subjects will no longer be set independently by Jiangsu Province, but will return to the national college entrance examination and adopt the national volume in a unified way. Widespread concern from all over the country has been aroused because of the promulgation of this plan, and it is also a huge challenge for teachers who have adapted to Jiangsu volume for many years. Therefore, according to the requirements of the new college entrance examination plan, this paper takes the National Volume I (Science Mathematics) and Jiangsu Volume (Science Mathematics) in 2015~2019 as the research object, compares and analyzes the similarities and differences between the two types of test papers from three aspects: the content of investigation, the ability requirements and the overall difficulty. The results are as follows: there are some differences between the national volume and Jiangsu volume in the degree of emphasis and the form of investigation of the content of investigation; the national volume pays more attention to the ability of calculating and solving than Jiangsu volume; the national volume pays more attention to spatial imagination than Jiangsu volume and both the national volume and Jiangsu volume pay attention to the investigation of basic knowledge and main contents.
文章引用:孙萌. 2015~2019年高考数学全国卷和江苏卷的比较研究[J]. 创新教育研究, 2021, 9(1): 142-155. https://doi.org/10.12677/CES.2021.91024

参考文献

[1] 任子朝, 周远方, 陈昂, 田祥高. 高考数学科考核目标研究[J]. 数学通报, 2013, 52(7): 1-8.
[2] 鲍建生. 中英两国初中数学期望课程综合难度的比较[J]. 全球教育展望, 2002, 31(9): 48-52.
[3] 王建磐, 鲍建生. 高中数学教材中例题的综合难度的国际比较[J]. 全球教育展望, 2014, 43(8): 101-1l0.
[4] 武小鹏, 张怡. 中国和韩国高考数学试题综合难度比较研究[J]. 数学教育学报, 2018, 27(3): 19-24+29.