道路病害探地雷达模型试验与GprMax正演模拟
Model Test of Road Disease Ground Penetrating Radar and Forward Simulation of GprMax
DOI: 10.12677/MOS.2021.101012, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 胥 晏:西华大学土木建筑与环境学院岩土工程研究所,四川 成都;王 鹏:中冶南方工程技术有限公司四川分公司,四川 成都
关键词: 探地雷达模型试验相对介电常数GprMax正演模拟Ground Penetrating Radar Model Test Relative Dielectric Constant GprMax Forward Modeling
摘要: 在试验模型箱中预埋了不同材质、不同填充物的目标体,利用探地雷达扫描并研究雷达波形图。采用金属管道和PVC管道两种材质,观察雷达反射波形图差别:金属管道反射波较PVC管道反射波强烈,探测目标体位于金属管道下方时会受到强烈干扰甚至无法探测,因此建议做模型试验时避免采用金属材质,尽量减少信号干扰提高雷达图像质量。采用空洞充水和充气探测的结果表明相对介电常数是影响雷达图像的关键因素之一。通过不同尺寸模型箱模拟不同大小的空洞病害,对相应雷达波形图进行分析,用GprMax编程软件对道路不同大小空洞病害进行正演模拟并分析模拟图。
Abstract: Target bodies with different materials and fillers are embedded in the test model box, and radar waveform is scanned and studied by GPR. This paper uses metal pipes and PVC pipes to observe the difference in radar reflection waveforms: the reflected wave of metal pipes is stronger than that of PVC pipes. When the detection target is under the metal pipe, it will be strongly interfered or even unable to be detected. Therefore, it is recommended to avoid using metal materials when doing model tests to minimize signal interference and improve radar image quality. The results of water-filling and gas-filled detection show that the relative dielectric constant is one of the key factors affecting radar images. Model boxes of different sizes are used to simulate cavity diseases of different sizes, and corresponding radar waveforms are analyzed. GprMax programming software is used to carry out forward simulation of cavity diseases of different sizes on the road and analyze simulation diagrams.
文章引用:胥晏, 王鹏. 道路病害探地雷达模型试验与GprMax正演模拟[J]. 建模与仿真, 2021, 10(1): 114-120. https://doi.org/10.12677/MOS.2021.101012

参考文献

[1] 交通运输部. 2017年交通运输行业发展统计公报[J]. 中国物流与采购, 2018(11): 51-55.
[2] 苏尚武, 张肖宁, 虞将苗, 等. 基于厚度恒定法测定沥青路面空隙率[J]. 中外公路, 2017, 37(5): 41-46.
[3] 王留涛. 高等级公路路基施工控制技术及质量管理[J]. 江西建材, 2017(9): 180-181.
[4] 段彬, 贺文文, 郑兴, 等. 探地雷达在城市道路空洞检测中的应用[J]. 市政技术, 2020(38): 128-131.
[5] 王晓鹏. 探地雷达技术在道路检测中的应用[J]. 中国高新科技, 2020(14): 106-107.
[6] 程甄. 基于探地雷达的城市道路检测[J]. 绿色科技, 2020(18): 176-177.
[7] 李世念, 王秀荣, 林恬, 等. 基于GprMax的道路空洞三维探地雷达正演数值模拟[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2020, 31(3): 132-138.
[8] Torrione, P.A., Morton, K.D., Sakaguchi, R., et al. (2014) Histograms of Oriented Gradi-ents for Landmine Detection in Ground-Penetrating Radar Data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52, 1539-1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Marecos, V., Fontul, S., de Lurdes Antunes, M., et al. (2017) Evaluation of a Highway Pavement Using Non-Destructive Tests: Falling Weight Deflectometer and Ground Penetrating Radar. Construction and Building Materials, 154, 1164-1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 朱云峰, 王齐仁, 张启, 等. 基于FDTD数值技术分析反向障碍物对探地雷达采集数据的影响[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2016, 44(5): 149-154.
[11] Warren, C., Giannopou-los, A. and Giannakis, I. (2016) gprMax: Open Source Software to Simulate Electromagnetic Wave Propagation for Ground Penetrating Radar. Computer Physics Communications, 209, 163-170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef