基于拌和方式的水泥稳定碎石基层性能研究
Study on Performance of Cement Stabilized Macadam Base Based on Mixing Mode
DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2021.102013, PDF,   
作者: 蔡长松, 吴立强:滨州市公路事业发展中心,山东 滨州;韩 烨, 闫翔鹏:山东省交通科学研究院,山东 济南;郑如岩:山东省滨州公路工程有限公司,山东 滨州
关键词: 振动拌和顺序拌合水泥稳定碎石抗压强度干缩性能Vibration Mixing Sequential Mixing Cement-Stabilized Macadam Compressive Strength Dry-Shrinkage Performance
摘要: 为了了解拌和方式对水泥稳定碎石材料性能的影响,本文选用3.5%、4.0%、4.5%、5.0%、5.5%五种水泥剂量分别对顺序拌和、振动拌和和传统常规拌和三种拌和方式下的最佳含水率、无侧限抗压强度、劈裂强度干缩系数等试验数据进行了对比分析。研究表明:相比较传统常规拌和工艺,顺序拌和和振动拌和技术最佳含水量可降低15%以上,无侧限抗压强度也有较大提升,同等水泥剂量下养护7 d后抗干缩性能也具有更优异的表现,当水泥剂量较大时振动拌和技术比顺序拌合技术有更好的性能表现。
Abstract: In order to understand the way of mixing effect on the performance of cement stabilized gravel materials, this paper chooses 3.5%, 4.0%, 4.5%, 5.0%, 5.5%, five kinds of cement dosage of traditional order mixing, vibrating mixing and conventional mixing three mixing mode of optimum moisture content and unconfined compressive strength, splitting strength, dry shrinkage coefficient and so on, comparing the test data analysis. Research shows that: compared with the traditional conventional mixing process, the order of mixing and vibrating mixing technology optimum moisture can reduce more than 15%, the unconfined compressive strength has large improvement, and also under the same cement dosage curing shrinkage resistance after 7 d also has more excellent performance, when the cement dosage larger vibration than order batch mixing technology has a better performance.
文章引用:蔡长松, 韩烨, 吴立强, 郑如岩, 闫翔鹏. 基于拌和方式的水泥稳定碎石基层性能研究[J]. 土木工程, 2021, 10(2): 117-123. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCE.2021.102013

参考文献

[1] 陈海民. 沥青路面密度测试方法分析[J]. 湖南交通科技, 2003, 29(1): 34-35.
[2] 但路昭, 陈飞, 陈伟, 等. 基于振动拌和工艺的水泥稳定碎石混合料路用性能研究[J]. 公路交通技术, 2018, 5(34): 22-26.
[3] 张先玲. 基于顺序拌和技术的水泥稳定碎石性能研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东建筑大学, 2019.
[4] 徐程. 振动拌和对水泥稳定碎石性能影响的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2019.
[5] 张鹏. 高等级公路半刚性基层材料的抗裂性能研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2007.
[6] 施洲辉. 基于振动搅拌的抗裂型水泥稳定碎石基层应用技术研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 长沙理工大学, 2016.