蜂窝陶瓷换热器的预热特性
Preheating Characteristics of Honeycomb Ceramic Heat Exchanger
摘要: 针对高温烟气和空气通过堆积蜂窝陶瓷蓄热体的换热过程,基于单孔蓄热体模型,通过数值模拟研究了流速和换向时间对预热过程中流体温度、蓄热体温度的演变过程,以及换热稳定后所达温度效率的影响。结果表明,在高温烟气进口温度1123.15 K、空气进口温度313.15 K的条件下,当换热时间为60 s时,随着迎面风速从0.75 m/s增加到1.5 m/s,放热期末空气出口温度从1083.83 K下降到1055.05 K,温度效率从95.15%下降到91.59%;当换向时间为90 s时,随着迎面风速从0.75 m/s增加到1.5 m/s,放热期末空气出口温度从1076.25 K下降到1040.37 K,温度效率从94.21%下降到89.78%。在相同的迎面流速下,换向时间越短,蓄热期烟气出口温度越小,放热期空气出口温度和温度效率越高;在相同的换向时间下,进口流速越大,蓄热期烟气出口温度越高,放热期空气出口温度和温度效率越低。蜂窝陶瓷蓄热体中换热过程的热惰性很强,需要经历较长的时间才能趋于稳定。
Abstract: Aiming at the heat exchange process of high-temperature flue gas and air passing through the stacked honeycomb ceramic regenerator, based on the single-hole regenerator model, numerical simulations were carried out to study the effects of flow velocity and switching time on the tem-perature distribution of fluid and honeycomb ceramics during the preheating process, and the ef-fect on the temperature efficiency reached after the heat exchange was stabilized. The results show that under the conditions of high temperature flue gas inlet temperature 1123.15 K and air inlet temperature 313.15 K, when the switching time is 60 s, as the face velocity increases from 0.75 m/s to 1.5 m/s, the air outlet temperature at the end of heat release period changes from 1083.83 K to 1055.05 K, and the temperature efficiency drops from 95.15% to 91.59%, when the switching time is 90 s, as the face velocity increases from 0.75 m/s to 1.5 m/s, the air outlet temperature at the end of heat release period drops from 1076.25 K to 1040.37 K, and the temperature efficiency drops from 94.21% to 89.78%. Under the same face velocity, the shorter the switching time, the lower the flue gas outlet temperature during the heat storage period, and the higher the air outlet temperature and temperature efficiency during the heat release period. Under the same switching time, when the inlet flow rate increases, the flue gas outlet temperature during the heat storage period increases, and the air outlet temperature decreases during the heat release period as well as the temperature efficiency. The thermal inertia of the heat exchange process in the honeycomb ceramic regenerator is very strong, and it takes a long time to stabilize.
文章引用:孙成喜, 王波, 王卓, 沈佳飞, 成金东, 王雅亮. 蜂窝陶瓷换热器的预热特性[J]. 建模与仿真, 2021, 10(1): 140-149. https://doi.org/10.12677/MOS.2021.101015

参考文献

[1] 王波, 马睿, 薛国程, 等. 工业有机废气热氧化技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(11): 4232-4242.
[2] 王波, 商庆垄, 刘梦辉, 孙成喜, 王卓, 蔡晓锋. 蓄热氧化炉中蜂窝陶瓷损坏机理及改进措施[J]. 中国陶瓷, 2020, 56(2): 20-26.
[3] 韩东太, 荐蓓蓓. 蓄热体余热回收换热器强化传热实验研究[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2014, 20(1): 70-76.
[4] 欧俭平, 蒋绍坚, 萧泽强. 蜂窝型蓄热体传热过程热工特性的数值研究[J]. 耐火材料, 2003(6): 348-351.
[5] 刘永启, 牟宝杰, 郑斌, 刘瑞祥, 高振强. 莫来石蜂窝陶瓷的阻力特性[J]. 陶瓷学报, 2012, 33(2): 162-166.
[6] 郑志伟, 仇性启, 祁风雷, 等. 蜂窝陶瓷蓄热体传热和阻力特性实验研究[J]. 石油化工设备, 2013, 42(1): 9-13.
[7] 张振兴, 刘永启, 高振强, 等. 陶瓷蓄热体的流动与传热特性模拟研究[J]. 内燃机与动力装置, 2010(2): 22-26.
[8] 张振兴. 基于均匀多孔介质模型的氧化床阻力特性数值研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 淄博: 山东理工大学, 2010.
[9] You, Y.H., et al. (2016) A Three-Dimensional Numerical Model of Unsteady Flow and Heat Transfer in Ceramic Honeycomb Regenerator. Applied Thermal Engineering, 108, 1243-1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Coutinho, J.E.A. and De Lemos, M.J.S. (2012) Laminar Flow with Combustion in Inert Porous Media. International Communications in Heat & Mass Transfer, 39, 896-903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 李伟, 祁海鹰, 由长福, 等. 蜂巢蓄热体传热性能的数值研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2001, 22(5): 657-660.
[12] 吕志超, 周丽雯, 刘坤, 马光宇, 李卫东, 刘常鹏. 蜂窝陶瓷蓄热体传热及气体流动特性的数值模拟[J]. 冶金能源, 2017, 36(S2): 43-45.
[13] 王波, 刘梦辉, 商庆垄, 孙成喜. 蜂窝陶瓷蓄热体阻力特性的数值模拟[J]. 热能动力工程, 2020, 35(7): 152-158.
[14] 钟水库, 马宪国, 赵无非, 眭向荣. 蜂窝陶瓷蓄热体换热器热性能的实验分析[J]. 上海理工大学学报, 2004(4): 333-335.
[15] 王娟, 黄碧纯, 赵建国, 吴军良, 付名利, 叶代启. 基于Fluent的甲苯蓄热燃烧过程的数值模拟[J]. 环境工程学报, 2011, 5(6): 1341-1346.