权力感影响大学生为他人决策时的风险偏好
The Sense of Power Affects the Risk Preference of College Students Making Decisions for Others
摘要: 使用经济、恋爱两种决策问卷,考察了中国大学生在高低权力感下,为相似与不相似他人决策时的风险偏好及其在不同决策任务中的表现。结果表明,经济任务下,权力感与相似性交互作用显著,低权力决策者为不相似他人决策更加冒险,高权力决策者为相似与不相似他人决策并无显著差异;在恋爱任务中,还发现相较于后果严重性高的决策任务,后果严重性低的决策任务冒险得分高;并且在后果严重性低的任务中,相较于低权力者,高权力者为不相似他人决策更冒险。综合实验结果,可以发现:权力感和相似性会影响个体为他人决策时的风险偏好,并且受决策内容与决策后果限制。
Abstract: Using economic and love decision-making questionnaires, the paper examined the decision-making risk preferences of Chinese college students for similar and dissimilar people under high and low power. The experiment examined the role of power and similarity in the choice of participants for decision-making tasks. The results show that under the two tasks, the sense of power has no significant influence on the decision-making decision; under the economic task, the interaction between power and similarity is significant, and the low-power participants are more risky for dissimilar people. High-power participants are not significantly different for similar and dissimilar decisions. In the love task, a decision-making task with a low consequence has a high risk score compared to a decision-making task with a high severity of consequences. Compared with similar studies, this study focuses more on “others” when discussing self-other decision-making, divides it into similar and dissimilar others, and adds a new factor—sense of power to explore the differences of different sense of power when individuals make decisions for others, which is closer to real life.
文章引用:吴思佳, 曹贵康 (2021). 权力感影响大学生为他人决策时的风险偏好. 心理学进展, 11(2), 571-584. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2021.112064

参考文献

[1] 陈永泰, 何有世(2008). 网络调查和传统纸质调查的差异性研究. 统计与决策, (16), 32-34.
[2] 单雯, 金盛华, 张卫青, 盛瑞鑫(2010). 从进化心理学视角看两性冒险行为. 心理科学进展, 18(11), 1828-1838.
[3] 段锦云, 黄彩云(2013). 个人权力感对进谏行为的影响机制: 权力认知的视角. 心理学报, 45(2), 217-230.
[4] 段锦云, 卢志巍, 张涵碧(2016). 权力感对风险决策框架效应的影响. 心理科学, (2), 412-417.
[5] 高娟, 王鹏, 王晓田, 孙倩, 刘永芳(2020). 得失情境下他人参照点及心理距离对自我-他人利益权衡的影响. 心理学报, 52(5), 633-644.
[6] 管延华, 迟毓凯, 戴金浩(2014). 权力对风险决策偏好的影响. 心理研究, 7(4), 42-47.
[7] 郝垒垒(2017). 自我-他人风险决策差异的实验研究. 硕士学位论文, 济南: 山东师范大学.
[8] 江苏丹(2016). 自我-他人心理距离对价值——可行性权衡的影响. 硕士学位论文, 济南: 山东师范大学.
[9] 李小平, 闫鸿磊, 云祥(2014). 权力感的启动对内隐和外显暴力态度的影响. 应用心理学, 20(4), 323-331.
[10] 刘永芳, 王鹏, 庄锦英, 钟俊, 孙庆洲, 刘毅(2014). 自我-他人决策差异: 问题、研究与思考. 心理科学进展, 22(4), 580-587.
[11] 任玉冰, 杜秀芳(2018). 心理距离与后果严重性对人身安全决策的影响. 心理与行为研究, 16(3), 41-48.
[12] 施春华, 王宝军, 严蔓青, 张琳(2019). 外显自恋和权力感启动对大学生风险决策影响[C]//2019年第二届教育改革、管理和应用社会科学国际学术会议论文集, 249-253.
[13] 宋晓雯(2019). 权力感与心理距离对风险决策的影响研究. 硕士学位论文, 烟台: 鲁东大学.
[14] 谭小宏, 秦启文(2005). 责任心的心理学研究与展望. 心理科学, 28(4), 991-994.
[15] 佟成军(2017). 关于网络调查与传统纸质调查差异的比较分析. 中国统计, (1), 64-67.
[16] 万绪霞(2015). 情绪在权力与风险决策关系中的影响的研究. 硕士学位论文, 济宁: 曲阜师范大学.
[17] 徐惊蛰, 谢晓非(2011). 解释水平视角下的自己-他人决策差异. 心理学报, 43(1), 11-20.
[18] 张琴, 杜秀芳, 王修欣(2016). 权力感和任务难度对个体建议采纳的影响. 心理科学, 39(5), 1184-1189.
[19] 张葳, 刘永芳, 孙庆洲, 胡启旭, 刘毅(2014). 异性交友决策任务上为不同心理距离他人决策的风险偏好. 心理学报, 46(10), 1580-1590.
[20] 赵凯佳, 刘丹萍, 杨珉(2018). 对基层医务人员基本工作情况进行纸质与电子问卷调查的对比研究. 中国卫生信息管理杂志, 15(5), 92-98.
[21] 朱丽萍(2017). 社会参照点对自我-他人风险决策的影响. 硕士学位论文, 济南: 山东师范大学.
[22] 庄锦英(2006). 决策心理学. 上海: 上海教育出版社.
[23] Beisswanger, A. H., Stone, E. R., Hupp, J. M., & Allgaier, L. (2003). Risk Taking in Relationships: Differences in Deciding for Oneself versus for a Friend. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 121-135.[CrossRef
[24] Byrne, D. (1971). The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
[25] Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship Orientation as a Moderator of the Effects of Social Power. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 80, 173.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From Power to Action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453-466.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Guinote, A. (2007). Behaviour Variability and the Situated Focus Theory of Power. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 256-295.[CrossRef
[28] Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Press.[CrossRef
[29] Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292.[CrossRef
[30] Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, Approach, and Inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.[CrossRef
[31] Leonhardt, J. M., Keller, L. R., & Pechmann, C. (2011). Avoiding the Risk of Responsibility by Seeking Uncertainty: Responsibility Aversion and Preference for Indirect Agency When Choosing for Others. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 405-413.[CrossRef
[32] Lerber, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the Effects of Accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Lu, J., Xie, X., & Xu, J. (2013). Desirability or Feasibility: Self-Other Decision-Making Differences. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 144.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013). The Social Distance Theory of Power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 158-186.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Polman, E., & Emich, K. J. (2011). Decisions for Others Are More Creative than Decisions for the Self. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 492.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Shan, W., Shenghua, J., Davis, H. M., Peng, K., Shao, X., & Wu, Y. (2012). Mating Strategies in Chinese Culture: Female Risk Avoiding vs. Male Risk Taking. Evolution & Human Behavior, 33, 182-192.[CrossRef
[37] Stone, E. R., & Allgaier, L. (2008). A Social Values Analysis of Self-Other Differences in Decision Making Involving Risk. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 30, 114-129.[CrossRef
[38] Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463.[CrossRef] [PubMed]