创造性评价的影响因素综述
A Review of the Influencing Factors of Creativity Evaluation
摘要: 众多研究证明,创造性无论是对于个人发展还是科技发明乃至社会进步都有着至关重要的作用,而创造性评价作为衡量创造性产物创新水平高低过程中的关键环节,对于后续创造性的激发具有重要的意义。当前,尽管创造性评价的方法日趋客观,但由于影响因素纷繁复杂,学界依旧缺乏规范统一的评价标准。本文主要探讨影响创造性评价的多种因素,包括评分者、创作者和文化背景等。明确创造性评价的影响因素,对于今后合理控制来自测评方面的误差,规范创造性评价的系统性的标准具有重要意义。
Abstract: Numerous studies have proved that creativity plays a vital role in personal development, scientific and technological inventions and social progress. Creativity evaluation, as a key link in the process of measuring the level of innovation of creative products, is of great significance to the subsequent stimulation of creativity. At present, although the methods of creativity evaluation are becoming more and more objective, the academic circle still lacks standardized and unified evaluation standards due to the complex influencing factors. This article mainly discusses a variety of factors that affect creativity evaluation, including raters, creators, and cultural backgrounds. Clarifying the influencing factors of creativity evaluation is of great significance for the reasonable control of errors from the evaluation and standardization of the systemic standards of creativity evaluation in the future.
文章引用:张俊俊. 创造性评价的影响因素综述[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2021, 10(2): 390-397. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2021.102057

参考文献

[1] Guilford, J.P. (1950) Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Sternberg, R.J., Amabile, T.M., Lubart, T.I., et al. (1999) Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press, New York.
[3] Wolfe, E.W. (2004) Identifying Rater Effects Using Latent Trait Models. Psychology Science, 46, 35-51.
[4] Wolfe, E.W. and McVay, A. (2012) Application of Latent Trait Models to Identifying Substantively Interesting Raters. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 31, 31-37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Runco, M.A. and Smith, W.R. (1992) Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Evaluations of Creative Ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 295-302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Blair, C.S. and Mumford, M.D. (2007) Errors in Idea Evaluation: Preference for the Unoriginal? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 197-222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 姜竹卿. 创造性评价: 参考系、评价主体和评价指标的作用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2019.
[8] Amabile, T.M. (1982) Social Psychology of Creativity: A Consensual Assessment Technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997-1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Amabile, T.M. (1996) Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Westview, Boulder.
[10] Kline, P. (2000) The Handbook of Psychological Testing. 2nd Edition, Vol. 25, Routledge, London.
[11] Baer, J., Kaufman, J.C. and Riggs, M. (2009) Rater-Domain Interactions in the Consensual Assessment Technique. International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 19, 87-92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Kaufman, J.C., Baer, J., Cole, J.C. and Sexton, J.D. (2008) A Comparison of Expert and Nonexpert Raters Using the Consensual Assessment Technique. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 171-178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Freeman, C., Son, J. and McRoberts, L.B. (2015) Comparison of Novice and Expert Evaluations of Apparel Design Illustrations Using the Consensual Assessment Technique. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 8, 122-130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Kaufman, J.C., Baer, J. and Cole, J.C. (2009) Expertise, Domains, and the Consensual Assessment Technique. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 223-233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Kaufman, J.C., Gentile, C.A. and Baer, J. (2005) Do Gifted Student Writers and Creative Writing Experts Rate Creativity the Same Way? Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 260-265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Kaufman, J.C., Baer, J., Cropley, D.H., Reiter-Palmon, R. and Sinnett, S. (2013) Furious Activity vs. Understanding: How Much Expertise Is Needed to Evaluate Creative Work? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 332-340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 刘烯琴, 刘玲, 宋宜颖, 刘嘉. 流体智力对创造性倾向的影响: 人格的中介作用[C]//第十七届全国心理学学术会议论文摘要集, 2014: 1145-1147.
[18] 葛樱. 个体的创造力水平对创造性产品评价的影响及其潜在机制[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2018.
[19] Miller, G.A. (1956) The Magical Number Seven plus or minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R. and Todd, P.M. (2010) Can There Ever Be Too Many Options? A Meta-Analytic Review of Choice Overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 409-425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Karwowski, M., Dul, J., Gralewski, J., Jauk, E., Jankowska, D.M., Gajda, A., Benedek, M., et al. (2016) Is Creativity without Intelligence Possible? A Necessary Condition Analysis. Intelligence, 57, 105-117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Jauk, E., Benedek, M., Dunst, B. and Neubauer, A.C. (2013) The Relationship between Intelligence and Creativity: New Support for the Threshold Hypothesis by Means of Empirical Breakpoint Detection. Intelligence, 41, 212-221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Tan, M., Mourgues, C., Hein, S., MacCormick, J., Barbot, B. and Grigorenko, E. (2015) Differences in Judgments of Creativity: How Do Academic Domain, Personality, and Self-Reported Creativity Influence Novice Judges’ Evaluations of Creative Productions? Journal of Intelligence, 3, 73-90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Benedek, M., Nordtvedt, N., Jauk, E., Koschmieder, C., Pretsch, J., Krammer, G. and Neubauer, A.C. (2016) Assessment of Creativity Evaluation Skills: A Psychometric Investigation in Prospective Teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 75-84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Silvia, P.J., Winterstein, B.P., Willse, J.T., Barona, C.M., Cram, J.T., Hess, K.I., Richard, C.A., et al. (2008) Assessing Creativity with Divergent Thinking Tasks: Exploring the Reliability and Validity of New Subjective Scoring Methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 68-85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Kaufman, J.C., Plucker, J.A. and Baer, J. (2008) Essentials of Creativity Assessment.
[27] Daly, S.R., Seifert, C.M., Yilmaz, S. and Gonzalez, R. (2016) Comparing Ideation Techniques for Beginning Designers. Journal of Mechanical Design, 138, Article ID: 101108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Valgeirsdottir, D., Onarheim, B. and Gabrielsen, G. (2015) Product Creativity Assessment of Innovations: Considering the Creative Process. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 3, 95-106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Duerksen, G.L. (1972) Some Effects of Expectation on Evaluation of Recorded Musical Performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 20, 268-272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Bernberg, R.E. (1953) Prestige Suggestion in Art as Communication. The Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 23-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Gergen, K.J. and Breger, I. (1965) Two Forms of Inference and Problems in the Assessment of Creativity. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 20, 215-216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Marcus, S., Opera, P. and Sandulescu, M. (1973) Painting Evaluation as Affected by Properties of the Stimulus. Revista de Psihologie, 19, 225-237.
[33] Kirk, U., Skov, M., Hulme, O., Christensen, M.S. and Zeki, S. (2009) Modulation of Aesthetic Value by Semantic Context: An fMRI Study. NeuroImage, 44, 1125-1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Hennessey, B.A. (1994) The Consensual Assessment Technique: An Examination of the Relationship between Ratings of Product and Process Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 193-208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] 韩建涛, 庞维国. 小而灵通, 老而顽固? 年龄信息对创造性观念评价的影响及其机制[J]. 心理科学, 2020(3): 615-621.
[36] Lebuda, I. and Karwowski, M. (2013) Tell Me Your Name and I’ll Tell You How Creative Your Work Is: Author’s Name and Gender as Factors Influencing Assessment of Products’ Creativity in Four Different Domains. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 137-142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[37] Leslie, S.J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M. and Freeland, E. (2015) Expectations of Brilliance Underlie Gender Distributions across Academic Disciplines. Science, 347, 262-265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Kaufman, J.C., Baer, J., Agars, M.D. and Loomis, D. (2010) Creativity Stereotypes and the Consensual Assessment Technique. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 200-205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[39] Hennessey, B.A. (2003) Is the Social Psychology of Creativity Really Social? Moving beyond a Focus on the Individual. In: Paulus, P. and Nijstad, B., Eds., Group Creativity: Innovation through Collaboration, Oxford University Press, New York, 181-201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[40] Karwowski, M. (2009) I’m Creative, But Am I Creative? Similarities and Differences between Self-Evaluated Small and Big-C Creativity in Poland. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 19, 7-26.
[41] Lan, L. and Kaufman, J.C. (2012) American and Chinese Similarities and Differences in Defining and Valuing Creative Products. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 285-306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[42] Goncalo, J.A. and Staw, B.M. (2006) Individualism-Collectivism and Group Creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 96-109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[43] Hong, S.W. and Lee, J.S. (2015) Nonexpert Evaluations on Architectural Design Creativity across Cultures. Creativity Research Journal, 27, 314-321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[44] Birney, D.P., Beckmann, J.F. and Seah, Y.Z. (2016) More than the Eye of the Beholder: The Interplay of Person, Task, and Situation Factors in Evaluative Judgments of Creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 400-408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[45] Zhou, J., Wang, X.M., Song, L.J. and Wu, J. (2017) Is It New? Personal and Contextual Influences on Perceptions of Novelty and Creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 180-202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[46] 张红, 任靖远, 刘晨阳, 罗劲. 创造性产品评价中的从众效应[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(6): 688-698.
[47] 徐建平, 段海燕, 李露, 朱黎明. 发散思维测验人工评分与机器评分比较[C]//第二十二届全国心理学学术会议摘要集, 2019: 2048-2049.
[48] 韩建涛, 刘文令, 庞维国. 创造力测评中的评分者效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(1): 171-180.