高管学术经历和企业创新投入的影响机制研究
Research on the Influence Mechanism of Senior Management’s Academic Experience and Enterprise Innovation Investment
摘要: 以我国2009~2018年沪深A股上市公司的14,000个数据为样本,实证研究高管学术经历和企业创新投入之间的关系,并在此基础上,从财务柔性和管理者短视两个视角对高管学术经历影响企业创新投入的路径进行研究。研究结果表明:1) 高管学术经历和企业创新投入显著正相关,说明引进具有学术经历的高管能够显著提升企业的创新投入水平。2) 财务柔性、管理者短视在高管学术经历和企业创新投入之间存在部分中介效应,说明有学术经历的高管可以通过增加财务柔性储备、减少管理者短视等途径来提升企业创新投入水平。
Abstract: Taking 14,055 data of Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies in China from 2009 to 2018 as a sample, empirically study the relationship between the academic experience of executives and corporate innovation investment. On this basis, from the perspectives of financial flexibility and managerial myopia, the path of executives' academic experience affecting corporate innovation investment is studied. The research results show that: 1) There is a significant positive correlation between the academic experience of executives and the innovation investment of enterprises, indicating that the introduction of executives with academic experience can significantly increase the level of innovation investment of enterprises. 2) Financial flexibility and managerial myopia have a partial mediating effect between the academic experience of executives and corporate innovation investment, indicating that executives with academic experience can increase corporate innovation investment by increasing financial flexibility reserves and reducing managerial myopia.
文章引用:温彩云. 高管学术经历和企业创新投入的影响机制研究[J]. 现代管理, 2021, 11(3): 213-226. https://doi.org/10.12677/MM.2021.113025

参考文献

[1] Dickson, B.J. (2007) Integrating Wealth and Power in China: The Communist Party’s Embrace of the Private Sector. China Quarterly, 192, 827-854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Hambrick, D.C. and Mason, P.A. (1984) Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193-206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Sunder, J., Sunder, S.V. and Zhang, J.J. (2017) Pilot CEOs and Corporate Innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 123, 209-224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 张晓亮, 杨海龙, 唐小飞. CEO学术经历与企业创新[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(2): 154-163.
[5] 黄灿, 年荣伟, 蒋青嬗, 郑鸿. “文人下海”会促进企业创新吗? [J]. 财经研究, 2019, 45(5): 111-124.
[6] 赵晨. 高管学术经历与上市公司创新关系研究[J]. 市场研究, 2019(10): 17-20.
[7] 郭文静. 高管学术经历与公司创新[J]. 经济研究导刊, 2019(6): 10-13.
[8] 孔德议, 许安心. 管理决断权、财务柔性与企业技术创新[J]. 证券市场导报, 2020(5): 56-63.
[9] Schroth, E. and Szalay, D. (2010) Cash Breeds Suc-cess: The Role of Financing Constraints in Patent Races. Review of Finance, 14, 73-118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 邬晓婧, 郭淑娟. 财务柔性、高管过度自信与技术创新投入关系[J]. 企业经济, 2016, 35(11): 35-40.
[11] 王怀明, 姜珊. 机构投资者持股、财务柔性与企业创新投入[J]. 财会通讯, 2019(15): 103-107.
[12] Pinkowitz, L. and Williamson, R. (1999) Bank Power and Cash Holdings: Evidence from Japan. The Review of Financial Studies, 14, 1059-1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 朱焱, 邢路杰. 中国上市公司高管学术经历对企业现金持有的影响[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2019, 40(6): 91-97.
[14] 秦翡. 高管学术经历、现金持有与公司业绩[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2019(4): 40-50.
[15] Stein, J. (1989) Efficient Capital Markets, Inefficient Firms: A Model of Myopic Corporate Behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 655-669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Capital Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 王小平, 王雪平. 研发背景高管与企业技术创新质量——基于中国制造业上市公司的经验证据[J]. 企业经济, 2019(8): 93-102.
[18] Cho, C.H., Jung, J.H., Kwak, B., et al. (2017) Professors on the Board: Do They Contribute to Society Outside the Classroom? Journal of Business Ethics, 141, 393-409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Francis, B., Hassan, I. and Wu, Q. (2015) Professors in the Boardroom and Their Impact on Corporate Governance and Firm Performance. Financial Management, 44, 547-581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 徐建波, 陈建明, 王嘉歆. 学术高管对企业创新的“双刃剑”效应——基于中小企业上市公司的实证分析[J/OL]. 科技进步与对策, 2020(6) : 1-10.
[21] 曾爱民, 张纯, 魏志华. 金融危机冲击、财务柔性储备与企业投资行为——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2013(4): 107-120.
[22] 时现, 吴厚堂. 内部控制、研发强度与管理短视——基于中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 南京审计大学学报, 2016, 13(5): 19-29.
[23] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5): 731-745.
[24] Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986) The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology, 51, 1173-1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] 汪青玲, 金烨. 研发投资强度与企业盈利能力相关性研究——基于中小板上市公司的经验数据[J]. 财会通讯, 2012(6): 91-93.
[26] 周楷唐, 麻志明, 吴联生. 高管学术经历与公司债务融资成本[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(7): 169-183.