耦合流体动力学方程的神经网络模型研究
Neural Network Flow Field Prediction Model Coupled with Fluid Dynamics Equations
DOI: 10.12677/IJFD.2021.91001, PDF,   
作者: 王 敏:中国船舶重工集团公司第七〇四研究所,上海;王 博:哈尔滨工程大学动力与能源工程学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨;明平剑:哈尔滨工程大学动力与能源工程学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨;中山大学中法核工程与技术学院,广东 珠海
关键词: 神经网络N-S方程非线性拟合近似求解流场预测Neural Network N-S Equation Nonlinear Fitting Approximate Solution Flow Field Prediction
摘要: 在流体力学中应用深度学习的技术成为研究热点,但是目前使用的纯粹数据驱动的神经网络模型,不具备物理知识定律的可解释性,而且作为预测模型时,其预测准确度较差。基于此,提出了耦合物理定律的神经网络模型,以层流二维圆柱绕流为例,实现了对流体动力学方程(N-S方程)的耦合与近似求解,并对模型的短时流场预测能力进行了验证。结果表明:该模型可以使用少量的训练数据对控制方程进行近似求解,对相应已知时刻的流场进行重建;进行未知时刻流场的预测时,与相同条件下纯数据驱动的神经网络流场预测模型相比,该模型具有更小的预测误差。
Abstract: In recent years, the application of deep learning technology in fluid mechanics has become a re-search hotspot. However, currently pure data-driven neural network models do not have the inter-pretability of the laws of physical knowledge, and when used as a prediction model, its prediction accuracy is poor. Based on this, a neural network model coupled with the laws of physics was de-veloped. Taking laminar two-dimensional cylindrical flow as an example, the approximate solution of the N-S equation was achieved, and the short-term flow field prediction ability of the model was verified. The results show that the model can use a small amount of training data to approximate the governing equations and reconstruct the corresponding flow field. When predicting the flow field, the model has smaller prediction error than pure data-driven neural network model under the same conditions.
文章引用:王敏, 王博, 明平剑. 耦合流体动力学方程的神经网络模型研究[J]. 流体动力学, 2021, 9(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.12677/IJFD.2021.91001

参考文献

[1] LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. and Hinton, G. (2015) Deep Learning. Nature, 521, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Bishop, C.M. (1995) Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Manning, C.D., Manning, C.D. and Schütze, H. (1999) Founda-tions of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge.
[4] Egmont-Petersen, M., de Ridder, D. and Handels, H. (2002) Image Processing with Neural Networks—A Review. Pattern Recognition, 35, 2279-2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 胡铁松, 周彦辰, 王先甲. 有一定物理基础的核素浓度预测神经网络模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2016, 36(1): 263-272.
[6] Kutz, J.N. (2017) Deep Learning in Fluid Dynamics. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 814, 1-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 王德明, 王莉, 张广明. 基于遗传BP神经网络的短期风速预测模型[J]. 浙江大学学报: 工学版, 2012(5): 837-841.
[8] 赵超, 李佳威, 伍耐明. 基于神经网络的流动预测模型研究[J]. 热能动力工程, 2017, 32(11): 8-12.
[9] 阮泉, 吴铁军. 结合先验知识的神经网络在生化系统建模中的应用[J]. 无锡轻工大学学报, 2001, 20(1): 55-57.
[10] Joerding, W.H. and Meador, J.L. (1991) Encoding a Priori Infor-mation in Feed forward Networks. Neural Networks, 4, 847-856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 娄海川, 苏宏业, 谢磊. 融合过程先验知识的递归神经网络模型及其应用[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(5): 1665-1673.
[12] 周彦辰, 胡铁松, 陈进, 等. 耦合动态方程的神经网络模型在水质预测中的应用[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2017, 34(9): 5-9.
[13] Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P. and Karniadakis, G.E. (2017) Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part I): Data-Driven Solutions of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equa-tions.
[14] Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P. and Karniadakis, G.E. (2017) Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part II): Da-ta-Driven Discovery of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations.
[15] 吴子牛. 计算流体力学基本原理[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001.
[16] Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y. and Courville, A. (2016) Deep Learning. MIT Press, Cam-bridge.
[17] Sherwin, S.J. and Karniadakis, G.E. (2005) Spectral/HP Element Methods for Computational Fluid Dy-namics. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, 17, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef