松辽盆地三肇凹陷致密储层地质评价
Geological Evaluation of Tight Reservoirs in Sanzhao Sag, Songliao Basin
DOI: 10.12677/JOGT.2021.431006, PDF,   
作者: 蒋瑞刚:大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院,黑龙江 大庆
关键词: 三肇凹陷扶杨油层致密油储层评价脆性指数压裂Sanzhao Sag Fuyu and Yangdachengzi Oil Layer Tight Oil Reservoir Evaluation Brittleness Index Fracturing
摘要: 致密油藏采用压裂方式投入开发后,以孔隙结构为基础的致密储层分类评价标准不再适用。针对致密储层体积压裂或缝网压裂的开发特点,在致密储层地质评价时采用脆性指数和单井控制储量两项参数评价储层,并以投产连续生产两年的累积产油量检验该方法评价结果的准确性。根据两项评价参数,把研究区致密储层分为三类,I类储层脆性指数和储层单井控制储量都高,II类储层脆性指数高、单井控制指数低或脆性指数低,单井控制储量高,III类储层脆性指数和单井控制储量都低,该分类标准符合率达到85%。研究区扶杨油层整体开发效果较差是由普通压裂的压裂工艺和致密储层的脆性指数较低共同决定的;压裂开发的致密油藏单井产能受脆性指数和单井控制储量的共同控制,两者具有互补的作用;采用综合多项地质参数于一体的单井控制储量评价致密储层,不仅实现了降维,而且取得了较好的评价效果。
Abstract: After a tight reservoir is developed by fracturing, the classification and evaluation criteria of tight reservoir based on pore structure are no longer applicable. In view of the development characteristics of volume fracturing or fracturing with fracture networks in tight reservoirs, brittleness index and single well controlled reserves are adopted to evaluate the reservoir in geological evaluation of tight reservoirs, and the accuracy of the evaluation results of this method is tested by cumulative oil production after two years of continuous production. According to the evaluation of two parameters, the dense reservoir in the study area is divided into three categories, I reservoir: high brittleness index and single well controlled reserves, II reservoir: high brittleness index and low single well controlled reserves, or low brittleness index and high single well controlled reserves, III reservoir: low brittleness index and single well controlled reserves. The classification standards coincidence rate reaches 85%. The poor overall development effect of Fuyu and Yangdachengzi reservoir in the study area is determined by the common fracturing technology and the low brittleness index of tight reservoir. Single well productivity of fractured tight reservoir is controlled by brittleness index and controlled reserves of single well and the two factors have complementary effect. The single well controlled reserves evaluation of tight reservoir with integrated multiple geological parameters not only realizes dimension reduction, but also obtains good evaluation effect.
文章引用:蒋瑞刚. 松辽盆地三肇凹陷致密储层地质评价[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2021, 43(1): 42-50. https://doi.org/10.12677/JOGT.2021.431006

参考文献

[1] 崔宝文, 林铁锋, 董万百, 等. 松辽盆地北部致密油水平井技术及勘探实践[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2014, 33(5): 16-22.
[2] 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 苏玲, 等. 中国致密储层孔隙结构表征需注意的问题及未来发展方向[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(11): 1123-1137.
[3] 张居和, 张博为, 冯子辉, 等. 致密储层岩性精准评价及毫米级样品油源精细对比——以松辽盆地北部QP1井为例[J]. 地质学报, 2020, 94(5): 1538-1550.
[4] 朱筱敏, 潘荣, 朱世发, 等. 致密储层研究进展和热点问题分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2018, 25(2): 141-146.
[5] 张鹏, 张金功, 霍苗, 等. 致密储油层综合分类评价定量方法[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 35(2): 13-19.
[6] 彭攀, 宁正福, 祁丽莎, 等. 致密储层孔隙结构研究方法概述[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2014, 4(1): 26-32.
[7] 杨海博, 武云云. 致密储层岩石的微观结构和力学性质试验分析[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2011, 4(3): 10-15.
[8] 林铁锋, 康德江. 松辽盆地三肇凹陷扶余油层致密储层分类精细评价[J]. 石油试验地质, 2017, 39(5): 686-694.
[9] 张筠, 葛祥, 王志文. 洛带气田遂宁组致密储层的快速产能评价[J]. 测井技术, 2007, 31(4): 342-347.
[10] 马旭, 郝瑞芬, 来轩昂, 等. 苏里格气田致密砂岩气藏水平井体积压裂矿场试验[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(5): 742-747.
[11] 道涵, 张兵, 何举涛, 等. 鄂尔多斯长7致密砂岩储层体积压裂可行性评价[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 29(1): 52-55.
[12] 袁菁华. 松辽盆地北部致密油体积压裂裂缝形成机理及控制方法[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2017, 36(2): 167-170.
[13] Rickman, R., Mullen, M., Petre, E., et al. (2010) A Practical Use of Shale Petrophysies for Stimulation Design Optimization: All Shale Plays Are Not Clones of the Barnett Shale. Paper Number: SPE-115258-MS.
[14] 李文阳, 邹洪岚. 从工程技术角度浅析页岩气的开采[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(6): 1218-1224.
[15] 娄娜, 赵天琦, 张雁. 齐家油田致密储层脆性指数计算方法研究[J]. 中州煤炭, 2016, (6): 140-144.
[16] 彭娇. 影响致密油层缝网压裂储层改造体积的主要因素研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安石油大学, 2016.
[17] Grieser, B. and Bray, J. (2007) Identification of Production Potential in Unconventional Reservoirs. Paper Number: SPE-106623-MS. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 苏玉亮, 任龙, 赵广渊, 等. 低渗透油藏考虑压裂的合理注采井距研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 36(6): 72-79.
[19] 刘吉余, 吴错, 甘森林, 等. 不同井网密度地质储量分布特征研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2011, 11(21): 5168-5171.
[20] 全国国土资源标准化技术委员会. DZ/T 0217-2005石油天然气储量估算规范[S]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2005.