特异性的符号和非符号数量表示：基于SNARC效应的研究
Specific Representation of Symbolic Magnitude and Non-Symbol Magnitude: A Study Based on the SNARC Effect
摘要: 目的：探讨符号和非符号的数空表征之间是否会相互影响。方法：采用数字大小判断任务，数字面积混合的数字大小判断任务对62名大学生进行行为实验。结果：被试在数字大小判断任务中出现了经典的SNARC效应，在数字面积混合的数字大小判断实验中也表现出了SNARC效应，而且实验一和实验二的SNARC效应的效应量没有显著差异。结论：就本实验中的数字和面积两种数量表征形式而言，非符号数量并没有对符号数量的空间表征产生影响，两者的空间表征是特异性的。
Abstract: Objective: To explore whether the Symbolic Magnitude and Non-symbolic Magnitude will affect each other. Methods: Using size comparison task and number area mixed number size judgment task to conduct behavioral experiments on 62 college students. Results: The subjects showed the number SNARC effect in size comparison task, and they also showed the SNARC effect in the number area mixed number size judgment task, and there was no significant difference in the effect size of the SNARC effect between experiment 1 and experiment 2. Conclusion: Regarding the two quantitative representation forms of number and area in this experiment, the non-symbol magnitude has no influence on the spatial representation of the symbol magnitude, and the spatial representation of the two is specific.
文章引用：曲静. 特异性的符号和非符号数量表示：基于SNARC效应的研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2021, 10(3): 748-756. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2021.103105

参考文献

[1] Ansari, D. (2008) Effects of Development and Enculturation on Number Representation in the Brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 278-291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S. and Spelke, E. (2004) Core Systems of Number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307-314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Nieder, A. and Dehaene, S. (2009) Representation of Number in the Brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 32, 185-208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Tosto, M., Petrill, S., Halberda, J., Trzaskowski, M., Tikhomirova, T., Bogdanova, O. and Germine, L. (2014) Why Do We Differ in Number Sense? Evidence from a Genetically Sensitive Investigation. Intelligence, 43, 35-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] De Smedt, B., Noël, M.-P., Gilmore, C. and Ansari, D. (2013) How Do Symbolic and Non-Symbolic Numerical Magnitude Processing Skills Relate to Individual Differences in Children’s Mathematical Skills? A Review of Evidence from Brain and Behavior. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2, 48-55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Dehaene, S., Bossini, S. and Giraux, P. (1993) The Mental Representation of Parity and Number Magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Hung, Y.H., Hung, D.L., Tzeng, O.J.-L. and Wu, D.H. (2008) Flexible Spatial Mapping of Different Notations of Numbers in Chinese Readers. Cognition, 106, 1441-1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Kopiske, K., Löwenkap, C., Eloka, O., Schiller, F., Kao, C., Wu, C. and Franz, V. (2016) The SNARC Effect in Chinese Numerals: Do Visual Properties of Characters and Hand Signs Influence Number Processing? PLoS ONE, 11, e0163897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Nuerk, H.-C., Wood, G. and Willmes, K. (2005) The Universal SNARC Effect—The Association between Number Magnitude and Space is a Modal. Experimental Psychology, 52, 187-194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 胡林成，熊哲宏. 符号数量和非符号数量的空间表征: 5岁儿童的SNARC效应和距离效应[J]. 心理科学, 2016, 39(2): 364-370.
[11] Nemeh, F., Humberstone, J., Yates, M.J. and Reeve, R.A. (2018) Non-Symbolic Magnitudes Are Represented Spatially: Evidence from a Non-Symbolic SNARC Task. PLoS ONE, 13, e0203019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Fias, W. (1996) The Importance of Magnitude Information in Numerical Processing: Evidence from the SNARC Effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 95-110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Lorch, R.F. and Myers, J.L. (1990) Regression Analyses of Repeated Measures Data in Cognitive Research. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149-157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Holloway, I.D., Price, G.R. and Ansari, D. (2010) Common and Segregated Neural Pathways for the Processing of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Numerical Magnitude: An fMRI Study. Neuroimage, 49, 1006-1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] He, L., Zuo, Z., Chen, L. and Humphrey, G. (2014) Effects of Number Magnitude and Notation at 7T: Separating the Neural Response to Small and Large, Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Number. Cerebral Cortex, 24, 2199-2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Bulthé, J., De Smedt, S.B. and de Beeck, H.P.O. (2014) Format-Dependent Representations of Symbolic and Non- Symbolic Numbers in the Human Cortex as Revealed by Multi-Voxel Pattern Analyses. Neuroimage, 87, 311-322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Lyons, I.M., Ansari, D. and Beilock, S.L. (2015) Qualitatively Different Coding of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Numbers in the Human Brain. Human Brain Mapping, 36, 475-488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Peters, L., Polspoel, B., de Beeck, H.O. and De Smedt, B. (2016) Brain Activity during Arithmetic in Symbolic and Non-Symbolic Formats in 9 to 12-Year-Old Children. Neuropsychologia, 86, 19-28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

为你推荐