奖励对注意偏向的影响:变化盲视的研究
The Influence of Value on Attentional Bias: A Study of Changing Blindness
摘要: 变化盲视和变化探测可以成为一种衡量注意偏向程度的方法,注意的偏向可以提高或降低变化盲视产生的概率、加快或延迟对变异刺激变化探测的时间。本研究将采用变化盲视和变化探测的方法,探索个体在高注意负荷背景下奖赏联结刺激对注意偏向的影响。实验一和实验二均采用被试内实验设计,分两个阶段进行。实验一中经过“奖赏联结范式”将红色刺激与绿色刺激分别与高、低奖赏联结在一起并在随后的变化盲视范式中作为一种靶刺激出现。在实验二中,奖赏联结后的刺激在测试阶段作为一种分心刺激出现。结果显示,相对于无奖赏无关刺激,当奖赏联结刺激作为一种靶刺激出现的时候,可以降低变化盲视发生的概率,也可以缩短变化探测所需要的时间,其中高奖赏条件下比低奖赏条件下更能起作用。而相对于无奖赏无关刺激,当奖赏联结刺激作为一种分心刺激出现的时候,会增加变化探测所需要的时间,但是不会增加变化盲视发生的概率。此外,奖赏联结的刺激会比无奖赏无关刺激占用更多的注意资源,当奖赏联结刺激作为一种靶刺激出现的时候,低奖赏联结刺激会比高奖赏联结刺激占用更多的注意资源,而当作为一种无关干扰刺激出现的时候,高奖赏联结刺激比低奖赏联结刺激占用更多的注意资源。
Abstract: There are unexpected means to measure the degree attentional bias, which is the “flicker para-digm” of the Change Blindness and Change Detection. Attentional biases can increase or decrease the probability of Change Blindness, speeding up or delaying the detection of changes in the mutant stimulus. To this end, this study will use the methods of Change Blindness and Change Detection to explore the impact of rewards on the attentional bias of individuals in the context of high attention-load. Experiment 1 and experiment 2 were both carried out using the within-subject design procedure, which contained two phases separately. The red and the green were associated with high-value and low-value respectively appeared as the targets in the test phase of experiment 1, while as the to-be-ignored distractor in the test phase of experiment 2. The study show that probability of change blindness reduced when the stimuli as the targets relative to the neutral color, and there was shorter time of change detection. Specially, the effect of the high-reward is better than the low-reward. On the contrary, it would take more time to detect the change in the flicker paradigm when the reward-associated colors as the task-irrelevant stimuli. Compared with the neutral color, the response was under red take the longest time. In addition, the reward-asso- ciated stimuli would use more attentional resources than the neutral stimuli. Comparing with the lower reward-associated stimuli, the higher reward-associated stimuli would use the less attentional resources when the reward-associated colors as the targets in the flicker paradigm, while the higher reward-associated stimuli would use the more cognitive resources when it as the task- irrelevant stimuli in the flicker paradigm.
文章引用:余琳霖. 奖励对注意偏向的影响:变化盲视的研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2021, 10(3): 757-764. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2021.103106

参考文献

[1] Kiss, M., Driver, J. and Eimer, M. (2009) Reward Priority of Visual Target Singletons Modulates Event-Related Potential Signatures of Attentional Selection. Psychological Science, 20, 245-251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Kristjánsson, A., Sigurjónsdóttir, O. and Driver, J. (2010) Fortune and Reversals of Fortune in Visual Search: Reward Contingencies for Pop-Out Targets Affect Search Efficiency and Target Repetition Effects. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 1229-1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Anderson, B.A., Laurent, P.A. and Yantis, S. (2013) Reward Predictions Bias Attentional Selection. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Chelazzi, L., Perlato, A., Santandrea, E. and Libera, C.D. (2012) Rewards Teach Visual Selective Attention. Vision Research, 85, 58-72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Hickey, C., Chelazzi, L. and Theeuwes, J. (2010) Reward Changes Salience in Human Vision via the Anterior Cingulate. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 11096-11103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Blackmore, S.J., Brelstaff, G., Nelson, K., et al. (1995) Is the Richness of Our Visual World an Illusion? Transsaccadic Memory for Complex scenes. Perception, 24, 1075-1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Simons, D.J. (2016) In Sight, Out of Mind: When Object Representations Fail. Psychological Science, 7, 301-305.
[8] Mitroff, S.R., Simons, D.J. and Levin, D.T. (2004) Nothing Compares 2 Views: Change Blindness Can Occur Despite Preserved Access to the Changed Information. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1268-1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Simons, D.J. and Rensink, R.A. (2005) Change Blindness: Past, Present, and Future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 16-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Simons, D.J. and Ambinder, M.S. (2005) Change Blindness: Theory and Consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 44-48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Goddard, E. and Clifford, C.W.G. (2013) A New Type of Change Blindness: Smooth, Isoluminant Color Changes Are Monitored on a Coarse Spatial Scale. Journal of Vision, 13, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Rensink, R.A., O’Regan, J.K. and Clark, J.J. (1997) To See or Not to See: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Lyyra, P., Wikgren, J. and Astikainen, P. (2010) Event-Related Potentials Reveal Rapid Registration of Features of Infrequent Changes during Change Blindness. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 6, Article No. 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Pessi, L., Jan, W., Timo, R., et al. (2012) Explicit Behavioral Detection of Visual Changes Develops without Their Implicit Neurophysiological Detectability. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Mccarley, J.S., Vais, M.J., Pringle, H., et al. (2004) Conversation Disrupts Change Detection in Complex Traffic Scenes. Human Factors, 46, 424-436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Le Pelley, M.E., Pearson, D., Griffiths, O. and Beesley, T. (2015) When Goals Conflict With Values: Counterproductive Attentional and Oculomotor Capture by Reward-Related Stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 158-171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Busch, N.A. (2013) The Fate of Object Memory Traces under Change Detection and Change Blindness. Brain Research, 1520, 107-115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Fukuda, K. and Vogel, E.K. (2009) Human Variation in Overriding Attentional Capture. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8726-8733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Lavie, N., Hirst, A., De Fockert, J.W. and Viding, E. (2004) Load Theory of Selective Attention and Cognitive Control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 339-354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]