胃肠道破裂、穿孔的影像学检查对比分析研究
Comparative Analysis of Imaging Examination of Gastrointestinal Tract Rupture and Perforation
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2021.113207, PDF,   
作者: 陈晓颖:重庆市江北区中医院外科,重庆;熊 彬, 曾 勇*:重庆医科大学附属第二医院急救部,重庆
关键词: 胃肠道破裂、穿孔腹部平片超声CTGastrointestinal Tract Rupture and Perforation Abdominal Plain Film Ultrasound CT
摘要: 目的:探讨胃肠道破裂、穿孔术前使用腹部平片、超声、CT影像学检查的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析2017年1月至2020年12月我院105例胃肠道破裂穿孔行手术治疗的患者,所有患者在手术前均使用腹部平片、超声和CT进行常规检查。按照术前影像学检查结果及术中探查结果对比研究分析,对腹部平片、超声和CT检查对胃肠道破裂、穿孔诊断符合率临床指标进行对比研究。结果:腹部平片检查的诊断符合率为77.1%,超声检查的诊断符合率为75.2%,CT检查的诊断符合率为96.2%。超声与腹部平片检查的诊断符合率相当,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),CT检查的诊断符合率明显高于超声和腹部平片(P < 0.05)。结论:CT检查对于胃肠道破裂、穿孔的诊断,比腹部平片和超声检查更加准确,更具有优势。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of abdominal plain film, ultrasound and CT imaging examination before gastrointestinal tract rupture and perforation. Method: From January 2017 to December 2020, 105 patients with gastroenteric perforation undergoing surgical treatment in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were examined with abdominal plain film, ultrasound and CT before operation. According to the results of preoperative imaging examination and intraoperative exploration, the diagnostic coincidence rate of abdominal plain film, ultrasound and CT for gastrointestinal tract rupture and perforation was compared. Result: The diagnostic coincidence rate of plain film, ultrasound and CT was 77.1%, 75.2% and 96.2%, respectively. The diagnostic coincidence rate of ultrasound and abdominal plain film was similar, and the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The diagnostic coincidence rate of CT was significantly higher than that of ultrasound and abdominal plain film (P < 0.05). Conclusion: CT examination for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal tract rupture and perforation is more accurate and has more advantages than abdominal plain film and ultrasound examination.
文章引用:陈晓颖, 熊彬, 曾勇. 胃肠道破裂、穿孔的影像学检查对比分析研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2021, 11(3): 1449-1453. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2021.113207

参考文献

[1] Gao, Y., Yu, K.J., Kang, K., et al. (2017) Procalcitionin as a Diagnostic Marker to Distinguish Upper and Lower Gastrointestinal Perforation. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 23, 4422-4427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 何杰. X线、CT诊断消化道穿孔的临床效果评估[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2019, 3(15): 134-135.
[3] 孟秋霞, 苏静, 许娜. 低频联合高频超声诊断上消化道穿孔的临床价值[J]. 重庆医学, 2020, 49(14): 2343-2347.
[4] 林雪花, 郑贤应, 曹代荣, 等. 胃肠道穿孔腹部平片和多层螺旋CT诊断比较研究[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2013, 32(11): 1655-1658.
[5] 胡鸿宇. 胃肠穿孔早期急诊诊断方法临床价值分析[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2008, 17(13): 2012-2013.
[6] 陈晓康, 陈泽坤, 吕国荣, 等. 超声在新生儿穿孔中的诊断价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2019, 35(12): 1140-1142.
[7] Bohm, A.M., Tolstrup, M.B. and Gögenur, L. (2017) Adaptive Process Triage System Cannot Identify Patients with Gastrointestinal Perforation. Danish Medical Journal, 64, 3428-3430.
[8] Hainaux, B., Agneessens, E., Bertinotti, R., et al. (2006) Accuracy of MDCT in Predicting Site of Gastrointestinal Tract Perforation. AJR, 187, 1179-1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Cho, H.S., Yoon, S.E., Park, S.H., et al. (2009) Distinction between Upper and Lower Gastrointestinal Perforation: Usefulness of the Periportal Free Air Sign on Computed Tomography. European Journal of Radiology, 69, 108-113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 曹国平, 邓小毅, 王六红. 多层螺旋CT哨兵气体征结合胃肠壁水肿在消化道穿孔定位中的价值探讨[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2016, 35(12): 1847-1850.
[11] 俞晓玲. MSCT在胃肠道穿孔的诊断及定位中的应用价值[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2019, 3(24): 243-245.
[12] 谭仲伦, 郭晓婷, 陈忠, 等. MSCT增强扫描在消化道穿孔的定位诊断价值[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2019, 38(12): 2349-2352.
[13] Hefny, A.F. and Abu-Zidan, F.M. (2011) Sonographic Diagnosis of Intraperitoneal Free Air. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock, 4, 511-513.
[14] 铁柱, 毕小霞, 高健, 等. 低高频超声联合应用诊断肠穿孔[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2015, 31(3): 231-234.