全方位护理对COPD患者PaO₂、PaCO₂、FEV1指标及生活质量的影响

The Effect of Comprehensive Nursing on PaO₂, PaCO₂, FEV1 and Quality of Life in Patients with COPD

摘要: 目的：探讨全方位护理对COPD患者PaO₂、PaCO₂、FEV1指标及生活质量的影响。方法：将平均年龄(70.51 ± 1.18)岁的多例COPD患者分为I组和II组。单号分为I组，双号位II组，均38例，前一组采用一般护理，后一组在I组的护理方案上进行全方位护理，观察I组和II组患者肺功能、PaO₂、PaCO₂及生活质量的影响。结果：I组和II组COPD患者经过4周干预后，II组的肺功能水平好于I组(P < 0.05)；II组COPD患者PaO2水平均高于I组(P < 0.05)，II组PaCO₂低于I组(P < 0.05)；I组和II组干预前生活质量评分相比差距较小(P > 0.05)，相比之前干预后上述因素分数升高(P < 0.05)，II组高于I组(P < 0.05)。结论：全方位护理能够帮助COPD患者加快缓解，改善病情，提高患者肺功能及生活质量，有利于改善预后。

Abstract: Objective: To explore the impact of comprehensive care on PaO₂, PaCO₂, FEV1 and quality of life of COPD patients. Methods: Multiple COPD patients with an average age of (70.51 ± 1.18) years old were divided into group I and group II. The single number is divided into group I and the double number group II, with 38 cases in each. The former group adopts general nursing, and the latter group carries out comprehensive nursing on the nursing plan of group I. Observe the lung function and PaO2 of the patients in group I and group II, PaCO₂ and the quality of life. Results: After 4 weeks of intervention in COPD patients in groups I and II, the lung function level of group II was better than that of group I (P < 0.05); the PaO₂ level of COPD patients in group II was higher than that of group I (P < 0.05), group II PaCO₂ was lower than that of group I (P < 0.05); the difference in quality of life scores between group I and group II before intervention was small (P > 0.05), and the scores of the above factors were higher than that after intervention (P < 0.05), group II It is higher than that of group I (P < 0.05). Conclusion: All-round care can help COPD patients to speed up the remission, improve the condition, improve the lung function and quality of life of the patients, and help improve the prognosis.