管理激励、研发投入与企业绩效关系研究
Research on the Relationship between Management Incentive, R&D Input and Enterprise Performance
摘要: 以2010~2019年中国A股医疗行业上市公司为样本,分析了研发投入、股权激励与公司绩效三者间的复杂关系。研究表明:1) 股权激励对公司绩效并无显著的反向调节作用;2) 创新投入与公司绩效有显著的正相关关系;创新投入对股权激励与公司绩效的关系无显著调节作用。关于股权激励效果出现负效应的现象,认为是高管持股比例增加所带来的控制权分散效应比较大,而高管与股东利益趋同效应对应则比较小,所以公司经济附加值随着高管持股的增加而减少。
Abstract:
Based on the samples of Chinese A-share medical companies from 2010 to 2019, this paper analyzes the complex relationship among R&D investment, equity incentive and corporate performance. The results show that: 1) Equity incentive has no significant effect on corporate performance; 2) There is a significant positive correlation between innovation input and corporate performance. Innovation input has no significant regulating effect on the relationship between equity incentive and corporate performance. As for the negative effect of equity incentive effect, it is believed that the decentralization effect of control brought by the increase of senior executives’ shareholding ratio is relatively large, while the convergence effect of senior executives’ and shareholders’ interests is relatively small. Therefore, the added value of corporate economy decreases with the increase of senior executives’ shareholding ratio.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
陈霞. 高管激励、研发投入与企业绩效调节效应实证分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2017(1): 178-181.
|
|
[2]
|
王凡, 周静. 创新投入决策与公司绩效水平——基于高管激励机制调节作用视角[J]. 经济视角, 2019(2): 64-73.
|
|
[3]
|
王一鸣, 杨梅. 企业创新投入、绩效与市场价值的关系——基于中国上市公司数据[J]. 经济问题, 2017(4): 1-5.
|
|
[4]
|
李书锋, 杨芸, 黄小琳. 高管激励调节下研发投入与公司绩效关系研究[J]. 会计之友, 2020(11): 66-72.
|
|
[5]
|
谢修齐. 高管激励、创新投入与企业绩效——基于医药上市公司的实证研究[J]. 商业会计, 2019(23): 29-33.
|
|
[6]
|
马卓珺. 企业价值衡量:EVA还是Tobin’s Q?——基于A股上市银行价值评估[J]. 会计师, 2018(5): 11-12.
|
|
[7]
|
罗婷, 朱青, 李丹. 解析R&D投入和公司价值之间的关系[J]. 金融研究, 2009(6): 100-110.
|
|
[8]
|
温倩. CEO股权激励对并购绩效的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2017.
|
|
[9]
|
毛剑峰, 李志雄. 管理层股权激励、研发支出与企业绩效的关系研究[J]. 统计与决策, 2016(9): 186-188.
|
|
[10]
|
向朝进, 谢明. 我国上市公司绩效与公司治理结构关系的实证分析[J]. 管理世界, 2003(5): 117-124.
|