大学生职业期望对择业焦虑的影响:心理弹性的遮掩效应
The Influence of College Students’ Occupational Expectations on Career Anxiety: The Masking Effect of Mental Resilience
摘要: 目的:了解疫情时期高年级大学生的职业期望、择业焦虑及心理弹性情况,分析心理弹性在职业期望和择业焦虑之间的作用。方法:采用职业期望量表、择业焦虑量表及心理弹性量表对河北省某高校971名高年级大学生进行问卷调查。结果:年级、专业和家庭平均月收入在择业焦虑上存在显著差异(F = 8.646, t = 2.59, F = 4.502, P < 0.01);家庭平均月收入和毕业去向在职业期望上存在显著差异(F = 4.567, F = 7.308, P < 0.01);性别、家庭平均月收入、是否接受过就业指导在心理弹性上存在显著差异(t = 3.539, F = 5.792, t = 3.539, P < 0.01)。职业期望与择业焦虑呈显著正相关(r = 0.181, P < 0.01),职业期望与心理弹性呈显著正相关(r = 0.367, P < 0.01),心理弹性和择业焦虑呈显著负相关(r = −0.114, P < 0.01)。心理弹性在职业期望和择业焦虑的间接效应表现为遮掩效应,间接效应与直接效应的比值为33.75%。结论:大学生的职业期望可以直接影响择业焦虑,也可以通过心理弹性的遮掩效应间接对择业焦虑产生影响。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the occupational expectations, career anxiety and mental resilience of se-nior college students, and analyze the role of mental resilience in the relationship between occu-pational expectations and career anxiety. Methods: 971 senior college students in Hebei Province were investigated with Occupational Expectations Scale, Career Anxiety Scale and Mental Resilience Scale. Results: The results showed that there were significant differences in career anxiety among grade, major and family average monthly income (F = 8.646, t = 2.59, F = 4.502, P < 0.01); there were significant differences in occupational expectations between family average monthly income and graduation destination (F = 4.567, F = 7.308, P < 0.01); there were significant differences in mental resilience among gender, family average monthly income and whether they had received employment guidance (t = 3.539, F = 5.792, t = 3.539, P < 0.01). There was a significant positive correlation between occupational expectations and career anxiety (r = 0.181, P < 0.01), a significant positive correlation between occupational expectations and mental resilience (r = 0.367, P < 0.01), and a significant negative correlation between mental resilience and career anxiety (r = −0.114, P < 0.01). The indirect effect of mental resilience on occupational expectations and career anxiety is masking effect, and the ratio of indirect effect to direct effect is 33.75%. Conclusion: The occupational expectations of college students can directly affect their career anxiety, and also indirectly affect their career anxiety through the masking effect of mental resilience.
文章引用:王婧宇, 杨帆, 王伟芳, 唐誉哲, 孙香杰, 孙晗, 尹洪菊, 赵阳 (2021). 大学生职业期望对择业焦虑的影响:心理弹性的遮掩效应. 心理学进展, 11(5), 1247-1255. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2021.115140

参考文献

[1] 柴丽红, 张雷, 柴星阳, 华田田(2020). 高校毕业生心理弹性、应对方式与就业焦虑的关系研究. 锦州医科大学学报(社会科学版), 18(4), 66-69+74.
[2] 陈稼瑜(2020). 新冠肺炎疫情对我国创业投资机构的影响及应对. 当代经济, (12), 9-13.
[3] 陈晓盾(2019). 高职院校毕业班学生心理弹性与择业焦虑的关系. 天津职业院校联合学报, 21(5), 117-123.
[4] 高慧, 王振肖, 苏颖, 陆运清(2021). 大学生心理弹性、自我管理与就业焦虑的关系. 心理月刊, 16(1), 30-32.
[5] 华竞芳(2011). 武汉市应届硕士毕业生择业焦虑及其社会心理影响因素相关研究. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 湖北大学.
[6] 黄海青, 吴丹(2019). 本科毕业生未来时间洞察力与择业焦虑的关联性研究. 教育现代化, 6(65), 219-220+240.
[7] 李欧(2015). 心理弹性与警察院校应届毕业生择业焦虑的关系. 公安教育, (5), 63-66.
[8] 李涛, 孙煖, 邬志辉, 单娜(2020). 新冠疫情冲击下我国高校应届毕业生就业现状实证研究. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 38(10), 110-126.
[9] 毛俊青(2013). 论大学生就业焦虑及对策. 科教文汇(中旬刊), 26(9), 192-193.
[10] 邱婷, 谭文(2012). 心理弹性的文献综述. 社会心理科学, 27(4), 9-13+33.
[11] 王思爽(2020). 不同心理弹性水平康复科患儿家长的注意偏向特征及其与积极情绪启动的关系. 硕士学位论文, 上海: 上海师范大学.
[12] 温亚萍, 吴严, 施季利(2020). 大学生自我构念与心理健康的关系: 心理弹性的遮掩效应. 高教论坛, (6), 117-120.
[13] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟(2014). 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 731-745.
[14] 吴谅谅, 李宝仙(2001). 大学毕业生的职业期望及其影响因素研究. 应用心理学, 7(3), 18-23.
[15] 薛文宗(2012). 大学毕业生职业期望与就业焦虑的相关研究. 吕梁教育学院学报, 29(3), 13-15.
[16] 杨泽明(2010). 师范类大学生职业期望、人格特质与就业压力的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 曲阜: 曲阜师范大学.
[17] 张佳(2018). 大学生毕业去向选择及影响因素的质性研究. 新西部, (6), 113-114.
[18] 张玉柱, 陈中永(2006). 高校毕业生择业焦虑问卷的初步编制. 中国心理卫生杂志, 20(8), 555-557.
[19] Wagnild, G. (2009). A Review of the Resilience Scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 17, 105-113.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Wu, Y., Yu, W. Z., Wu, X. Y., Wan, H. H., Wang, Y., & Lu, G. H. (2020). Psychological Resilience and Positive Coping Styles among Chinese Undergraduate Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Psychology, 8, 551-535.[CrossRef] [PubMed]