人工智能视阈下艺术的本质与边界探析
Explore the Definition of Art in the Context of Artificial Intelligence
摘要: 艺术本身就不可能处于一个静止恒定的状态,它其实一直处于发展与变化的动态过程中。无论是技术还是艺术家都努力在突破艺术定义的封锁与绑定。传统美学借助本质主义定义方式以寻求一种艺术的共同客观本质来划分“艺术”与“非艺术”,而先锋艺术的出现在一定程度上解构了这种定义方式。人工智能的出现势必再一次给予艺术界定新的难题。艺术的定义只能一直在建构与解构中不断向前发展,无法得到一个永恒,全面而确切的答案。
Abstract: Art may not be in a static and constant state; it is in fact always in a dynamic process of development and change. Both technology and artists strive to break out of the blockages and bindings of the definition of art. The emergence of pioneering art has, to a certain extent, deconstructed the definition of “art” and “non-art”, which was traditionally defined by essentialism in search of a common objective essence of art. The emergence of artificial intelligence is bound to once again give art a new challenge to define. The definition of art can only keep moving forward in the process of construction and deconstruction, without an eternal, comprehensive and definitive answer.
文章引用:廖子萱. 人工智能视阈下艺术的本质与边界探析[J]. 艺术研究快报, 2021, 10(2): 48-52. https://doi.org/10.12677/ARL.2021.102008

参考文献

[1] 魏红珊. 中西绘画美学命题: “气韵论”与“模仿说”[J]. 中华文化论坛, 2018(10): 126-136.
[2] 卡西尔. 人论[M]. 甘阳, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 1985: 189.
[3] 苏珊·朗格. 艺术问题[M]. 滕守尧, 译. 南京: 南京出版社, 2006: 86.
[4] 何兴泉. 克莱夫·贝尔和他的《艺术》[J]. 新美术, 2015(36): 81-83.
[5] 舒开智. 语境叠合: 审美资本主义时代的美学难题[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 42(2): 109-114.
[6] 霍克海默, 阿多诺. 启蒙的辩证法[M]. 洪佩郁, 等, 译. 重庆: 重庆出版社, 1990: 148.
[7] 瓦尔特·本雅明. 迎向灵光消逝的年代: 本雅明论艺术[M]. 许绮玲, 林志明, 译. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 2008: 36.
[8] 徐岱. 维特根斯坦及其美学[J]. 浙江学刊, 2015(4): 89-98.
[9] 古德曼. 构造世界的多种方式[M]. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2008: 70.
[10] Danto, A.C. (1995) The Artworld. In: The Philosophy of Art: Readings Ancient and Modern, McGraw-Hill, 2 Pennsylvania Plaza, 209.
[11] Dickie, G. (1974) Art and Aesthetic. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 34.
[12] 马世龙, 乌尼日其其格, 李小平. 大数据与深度学习综述[J]. 智能系统学报, 2016, 11(6): 728-742.
[13] 周宪. 换种方式说“艺术边界”[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016(53): 21-28+42.