SCAD惩罚下基因–环境交互效应的识别方法研究
Identification of Gene-Environment Interaction Using SCAD Penalty
DOI: 10.12677/AAM.2021.105187, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 谢文玮:太原理工大学数学学院,山西 太原;李东喜:太原理工大学大数据学院,山西 太原
关键词: 变量选择基因–环境交互SCAD惩罚项加权LAD损失函数Variable Selection Gene-Environment Interaction SCAD Penalty Weighted LAD Loss Function
摘要: 对于许多复杂的癌症疾病,单一的基因效应或单一的环境效应不能进行有效的预测判断,识别与复杂疾病相关的基因–环境交互作用成为了高维数据下病理学和生物信息学研究的一大挑战。对于生存数据高维度、异质性、删失性等问题,我们提出了一种基于AFT模型的识别基因–环境交互作用的方法。该方法创新地通过采用LAD损失函数和SCAD惩罚函数相结合的目标函数减除数据不平衡带来的影响并选出服从主效应与交互效应间的强层次结构的交互项,并利用CCCP算法对目标函数进行优化求解。利用R进行了仿真研究和实证研究,从这两方面验证了该方法能稳健地选择出合适的基因效应和基因–环境交互效应,具有较好的预测性和稳定性,且该方法能有效压缩备选的变量,选出的模型简洁、有较好的解释性。
Abstract: For many complex cancer diseases, a single gene effect or a single environmental effect cannot account for the total variant of prediction results. Identifying the gene-environment interactions associated with complex diseases has become a major challenge for pathology and bioinformatics research under high-dimensional data. To solve the problems of high dimension, heterogeneity, and censored survival data, we proposed an AFT model-based method to identify gene-environment interactions. In this method, an objective function combining LAD loss function and SCAD penalty function is innovatively adopted to reduce the influence of unbalanced data and to select interaction terms that follow a strong hierarchical structure between main effects and interaction effects. The objective function is optimized and solved by CCCP algorithm. Simulation and empirical studies were carried out using R to verify that this method can select the appropriate gene effect and gene-environment interaction effect, and has good predictability and stability. Moreover, this method can effectively compress the alternative variables, and the selected model is simple and has good explanatory ability.
文章引用:谢文玮, 李东喜. SCAD惩罚下基因–环境交互效应的识别方法研究[J]. 应用数学进展, 2021, 10(5): 1765-1775. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2021.105187

参考文献

[1] Hedelin, M., Chang, E.T. and Wiklund, F. (2010) Association of Frequent Consumption of Fatty Fish with Prostate Cancer risk Is Modified by COX-2 Polymorphism. International Journal of Cancer, 120, 398-405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Thomas, D. (2010) Gene-Environment-Wide Association Studies: Emerging Approaches. Nature Reviews Genetics, 11, 259-272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Xu, Y., Wu, M., Ma, S. and Ejaz Ahmed, S. (2018) Robust Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis Using Penalized Trimmed Regression. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 88, 3502-3528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Corella, D., Peloso, G. and Arnett, D.K. (2009) APOA2, Dietary Fat, and Body Mass Index: Replication of a Gene-Diet Interaction in 3 Independent Populations. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169, 1897-1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Wu, C. and Ma, S. (2015) A Selective Review of Robust Variable Selection with Applications in Bioinformatics. Brief Bioinformatics, 16, 873-883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Wu, C., Jiang, Y., Ren, J., Cui, Y. and Ma, S. (2018) Dissecting Gene-Environment Interactions: A Penalized Robust Approach Accounting for Hierarchical Structures. Statistics in Medicine, 37, 437-456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Zhu, R., Zhao, H. and Ma, S. (2014) Identifying Gene-Environment and Gene-Gene Interactions Using a Progressive Penalization Approach. Genetic Epidemiology, 38, 353-368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Ma, S. (2012) Identification of Gene-Environment Interactions in Cancer Prognosis Studies Using Penalization. Memorie Della Societa Astronomica Italiana, 80, 824.
[9] Ren, J., Zhou, F., Li, X., et al. (2019) Semiparametric Bayesian Variable Selection for Gene-Environment Interactions. Statistics in Medicine, 39, 617-638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Xu, Y., Wu, M., Zhang, Q. and Ma, S. (2018) Robust Identification of Gene-Environment Interactions for Prognosis Using a Quantile Partial Correlation Approach. Genomics, 111, 1115-1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Fan, J. and Li, R. (2001) Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and Its Oracle Properties. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 1348-1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Stute, W. (1996) Distributional Convergence under Random Censorship When Covariables Are Present. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 23, 461-471.
[13] Kim, Y., Choi, H. and Oh, H. (2008) Smoothly Clipped Absolute Deviation on High Dimensions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 1665-1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Kim, G., Lai, C.-Q., Arnett, D.K., et al. (2018) Detection of Gene-Environment Interactions in a Family-Based Population Using SCAD. Statistics in Medicine, 37, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Shi, X., Liu, J. and Huang, J. (2014) A Penalized Robust Method for Identifying Gene-Environment Interactions. Genetic Epidemiology, 38, 220-230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 王玉丽. 乳腺癌发生发展中COL11A1和MMP3基因表达的动态改变及其诊断和预后价值的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 天津: 天津医科大学, 2007.
[17] 宋囡. 蛋白质去泛素化酶USP9X促进乳腺癌发生发展的分子机理研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 天津: 天津医科大学, 2018.
[18] 高勇. RNAi技术探讨UTRN基因在癌症发生过程中的作用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2007.
[19] 吴珊珊. 非肌细胞肌球蛋白重链IIA亚型在乳腺癌转移中的作用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2012.