皮克林和马克思的实践观比较研究
A Comparative Study of Pickering and Marx’s View of Practice
摘要: 皮克林对于科学哲学研究向实践视野的转变起到了重要作用,侧重于具体而微观的实践,马克思则侧重于抽象而宏观的实践。文章从研究进路、人–自然–社会三者关系、本体论的视角进行比较研究,最后得出结论:实践是人的实践,实践的出发点和归宿点也应当是人。
Abstract:
Pickering played an important role in shifting the study of philosophy of science to a practical perspective, focusing on concrete and micro-practices, while Marx focused on abstract and macro-practices. The article conducts a comparative study from the perspectives of research approach, human-nature-society relationship and ontology, and finally concludes that practice is human practice, and the starting point and destination of practice should also be human.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
范岱年. 科学社会学在中国大陆的兴起[J]. 科学与社会, 2015, 5(2): 46-54.
|
|
[2]
|
伊恩·哈金, 安德鲁·皮克林, 大卫·凯里, 王荣江. “如何认识科学”(四): 大卫·凯里对伊恩·哈金和安德鲁·皮克林的访谈[J]. 淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 37(2): 168-176, 279.
|
|
[3]
|
Pickering, A. (1993) Science as Practice and Culture. American Journal of Sociology, 22, 183-190.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
邢冬梅. 从表征到操作: 科学的实践转向[J]. 社会科学杂志, 2009(1): 134-138.
|
|
[5]
|
阎孟伟, 著. 在马克思实践哲学的视野中[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2011: 76.
|
|
[6]
|
郝新鸿. 走向辩证的新本体论: 访安德鲁·皮克林教授[J]. 复印报刊资料(科学技术哲学), 2012(4): 24-28.
|