中国南海U型线内历史性权利维护研究
A Study on the Maintenance of Historical Rights in the U-Shaped Line of the South China Sea
DOI: 10.12677/DS.2021.72005, PDF,   
作者: 仵原佼:华东政法大学国际法学院,上海
关键词: 历史性权利南海海洋法U型线 Historic Rights South China Sea Law of the Sea U-Shaped Line
摘要: 在国际海洋法上,历史性权利得到愈发的重视,然而至今对历史性权利并未有明确的定义,学术上也存在多种见解,关于历史性权利的争议一直存在,与国家的海洋权益密切相关。本文基于我国与南海周边国家爆发的南海争端,探讨关于我国在南海U型线内的历史性权利维护问题。在应对南海问题,维护南海U型线内的海洋权益时,应从各方面切实加强国家管理,通过国内立法活动和国际合作活动,利用法律武器维护自己的既得权利,也应利用国际规则勇敢主张我国在U型线内的历史性权利,推动我国在南海权益上的维护。
Abstract: In the international law of the sea, historical rights have been paid more and more attention. However, there is no clear definition of historical rights and there are also many opinions in academics. Disputes about historical rights have always existed, and the country’s maritime rights closely related. Based on the South China Sea dispute that broke out between my country and the neighboring countries in the South China Sea, this article discusses the issue of my country’s historical rights maintenance within the U-shaped line of the South China Sea. When dealing with the South China Sea issue and safeguarding maritime rights and interests within the U-shaped line of the South China Sea, national management should be strengthened in all respects, domestic legislative activities and international cooperation activities should be strengthened, legal weapons should be used to protect their acquired rights, and international rules should be used to bravely advocate my country. The historical rights within the U-shaped line promote the protection of my country’s rights and interests in the South China Sea.
文章引用:仵原佼. 中国南海U型线内历史性权利维护研究[J]. 争议解决, 2021, 7(2): 37-45. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2021.72005

参考文献

[1] 赵理海. 海洋法问题研究[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1996.
[2] Fisheries Case (United Kingdom v. Norway). Judgment, I. C. J. Reports. 1951.
[3] 山旭. 海权约法——中国参与联合国海洋法公约谈判始末[J]. 瞭望东方周刊, 2012(47).
[4] 王军敏. 从国际法看中国在南海的权利[N]. 学习时报, 2014-07-07, 第2版.
[5] Hearing on the Merits and Remaining Issues of Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Day 1, 24 November 2015, p. 71, p. 74.
[6] 樊文光. 中国南海历史性权利探析——以中菲南海仲裁案为视角[J]. 亚太安全与海洋研究, 2016(4): 57-68.
[7] 李金明. 国内外有关南海断续线法律地位的研究述评[J]. 南洋问题研究, 2011(2): 54.
[8] 许森安. 南海断续国界线的内涵[C]//21世纪的南海问题与前瞻研讨会论文选. 海南: 海南南海研究中心, 2000.
[9] 王军敏. 中国在南海的历史性权利[J]. 中国边疆史地研究, 2014, 24(4): 127-139.
[10] See Continental Shelf (Tunisia /Libyan Arab Jamahiriya), Judgment, I. C. J. Reports 1982, pp. 73-74, para. 100.
[11] 谈中正. “历史性权源”在《联合国海洋法公约》中的法律地位: 兼评南海仲裁案中菲律宾的相关主张[J]. 国际法研究, 2016(3): 3-22.
[12] International Law Commission, Juridical Regime of Historic Waters, Including Historic Bays, U.N. Doc No. A/CN.4/143 (9 Mar. 1962), para. 33 (Em-phasis Added). MP, Vol. XI, Annex LA-89.
[13] See Case Concerning the Land, Islands and Maritime Frontier Dispute (EL Salvador/Honduras: Nicaragua Intervening), Judgment of 11 September 1992, I.C.J. Reports 1992. Para. 332.
[14] 105 S. Ct. 1074 (1985).
[15] 骆耀军, 彭玉芳. 晚清以来报刊对南海诸岛“庙宇”的文化叙述与转向[J]. 亚太安全与海洋研究, 2016(2): 65-77.
[16] 中国代表团提出的“关于国家管辖范围内海域的工作文件”(1973年7月14日) [Z]. 北京大学法律系国际法教研室编: 《海洋法资料汇编》.
[17] 秦晓华. 南海诸岛礁名称的中国传统文化内涵及其意义[J]. 南海学刊, 2016, 2(1): 45-51.