产品草图方案感性评价中的脑认知加工机制研究
Brain Cognitive Processing Mechanism in Kansei Evaluation of Product Sketch Scheme
DOI: 10.12677/SEA.2021.103030, PDF,   
作者: 杨濮瑜*, 林 丽#:贵州大学机械工程学院,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 感性工学感性评价脑电技术脑认知Kansei Engineering Kansei Evaluation EEG Technology Brain Cognition
摘要: 为减少产品草图方案感性评价中主观因素的影响,改善依赖主观偏好和个人经验进行感性评价的局限性,开展用户对不同草图方案设计感性评估脑认知加工机制的研究。以充电桩草图方案为评价对象,运用语义差异法和头皮脑电采集技术,设置“传统感”和“现代感”感性意象明确且语义相对的刺激样本,使用SPSS、EEGLAB软件对用户感性评价过程中行为反应和脑电反馈进行统计分析,探讨用户在两类感性评价中脑认知加工过程。结果表明,圆角及曲面造型方案更容易诱发用户“现代感”的感性意象,用户匹配正确率最高,且视觉诱发顶区P300振幅要显著高于“传统感”意象;在“传统感”意象的评价中,用户普遍认为具有直线造型特征的草图方案更具有“传统感”,反应时变长,正确率降低,且更容易在额区和中央区诱发N400成分。P300、N400诱发情况和振幅大小可有效消除主观因素在产品草图方案评价中的影响,为草图方案评价过程提供客观的参考依据。
Abstract: In order to reduce the influence of subjective factors in the kansei evaluation of product sketches, and to improve the limitations of relying on subjective preference and personal experience in kansei evaluation, we have carried out research on the cognitive processing mechanism of users’ kansei evaluation of the design of different sketches, taking the charging pile sketches as the evaluation object, using the semantic difference method (SD) and EEG technology, setting up “tra-ditional” and “modern” kansei images with definite and semantically relative stimulus samples, using SPSS and EEGLAB software to evaluate the user’s kansei evaluation process perform statis-tical analysis on behavioral responses and EEG feedback to explore the cognitive processing process of users in the two types of kansei evaluation. The results show that the rounded corners and curved surface modeling schemes are more likely to induce users’ “modern” kansei image, and the user’s matching accuracy is the highest, and also the P300 amplitude of the visually induced top zone is significantly higher than the “traditional” one; in the evaluation of “traditional” kansei image, users generally think that the sketch with linear modeling features is more “traditional”, the response time becomes longer, the accuracy rate is reduced, and it is easier to induce N400 com-ponents in the frontal and central brain areas. The induced conditions and amplitude of P300 and N400 can effectively eliminate the influence of subjective factors in the evaluation of product sketches, and provide an objective reference for the evaluation process of sketches.
文章引用:杨濮瑜, 林丽. 产品草图方案感性评价中的脑认知加工机制研究[J]. 软件工程与应用, 2021, 10(3): 265-274. https://doi.org/10.12677/SEA.2021.103030

参考文献

[1] 李彦, 刘红围, 李梦蝶, 等. 设计思维研究综述[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(15): 1-20.
[2] 孙凌云, 王长路, 柴春雷, 等. 基于创意拐点的计算机辅助草图设计技术[J]. 中国科学:信息科学, 2013, 43(8): 996-1011.
[3] 尹碧菊, 李彦, 熊艳, 等. 设计思维研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2013, 19(6): 1165-1176.
[4] 张芳兰, 杨明朗, 刘卫东. 基于模糊TOPSIS方法的汽车形态设计方案评价[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2014, 20(2): 276-283.
[5] 席涛, 周芷薇, 余非石. 设计科学研究方法探讨[J]. 包装工程, 2021, 42(8): 63-78.
[6] 吴志锋, 王坤. 产品设计人员草图行为的策略差异[J]. 泉州师范学院学报, 2019, 37(2): 94-98.
[7] 王新亭, 邓玮丹. 基于眼部追踪技术的产品意象草图认知差异研究[J]. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 2019, 31(2): 287-294.
[8] Self, J.A. (2019) Communication through Design Sketches: Implications for Stakeholder Interpretation during Concept Design. Design Studies, 63, 1-36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Zhou, C., Chai, C. and Liao, J. (2021) Analysis of Problem Decomposition Strategies of Novice Industrial Designers Using Network-Based Cognitive Maps. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30, 1-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Yang, E.K. and Lee, J.H. (2020) Cognitive Impact of Virtual Reality Sketching on Designers’ Concept Generation. Digital Creativity (Exeter), 31, 82-97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Gazzaniga, M.S., Ivry, R.B., Mangun, G.R. 认知神经科学——关于心智的生物学[Z]. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 2011: 17-47.
[12] 侯冠华, 卢国英. 标识设计中语义认知事件相关电位[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(11): 1582-1588.
[13] 郑慧, 元小冬, 张萍淑, 等. 小脑参与脑认知功能的事件相关电位研究进展[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志, 2020, 22(5): 556-558.
[14] 王宇, 陈晨, 张家琦, 等. 任务提示的脑认知加工过程中神经振荡机制研究[J]. 电子学报, 2020, 48(5): 960-965.
[15] 肖英霞. P300与认知加工: 方法、机制和应用[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2015, 23(9): 1425-1430.
[16] 杨元, 刘文金, 李国华. 用户对家具产品不同偏好的脑认知探微[J]. 林业工程学报, 2019, 4(5): 152-158.
[17] 陈默, 王海燕, 薛澄岐, 等. 基于事件相关电位的产品意象-语义匹配评估[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 44(1): 58-62.