复合型碳源在污水处理厂脱氮提质增效方面的优化研究
Study on Optimization and Efficiency Improvement of Compound Carbon Source in Wastewater Treatment Plant Denitrification
摘要: 针对我国城镇污水处理进水浓度低、需要外部投加大量碳源进行脱氮处理的问题,本文对碳源的反硝化速率、类型选择、投加方案优化、生物促进功能等方面进行了简要的研究分析和整理。研究结果表明:常用的乙酸钠、甲醇、葡萄糖这三种通用类碳源,其硝氮反应去除速率分别为60 min、90 min、120 min即可实现90%以上的去除率。碳源投加量C/N对反硝化去除总氮速率影响不大,与硝氮去除量有直接的对应关系。当投加/消耗碳氮比C/N在4~5之间时,碳源去除硝氮的效率和经济核算较为理想。通过不同反应速率和不同类型的碳源组分进行复合,添加具备生物促进功能组分等方式,有利于碳源与工艺停留时间进行匹配,提高菌种生物多样性和微生物活性,能够更高效地提高反硝化速率和效果,提高全流程总氮处理负荷和去除效率。
Abstract: In view of the low influent concentration of urban sewage treatment in China and the need to add a large number of external carbon sources for nitrogen removal, this paper studies and analyzes the denitrification rate, type selection, dosing scheme optimization and biological promotion function of carbon sources. The research results show that the commonly used sodium acetate, methanol, and glucose are three general-purpose carbon sources, and the removal rate of nitrate-nitrogen reaction is 60 min, 90 min, and 120 min, respectively, to achieve a removal rate of more than 90%. The dosage of carbon source C/N has little effect on the rate of total nitrogen removal by denitrification, but has a direct relationship with the removal of nitrate-nitrogen. When the dosing/consumption carbon-nitrogen ratio C/N is between 4 and 5, the efficiency of carbon source to remove nitrate-nitrogen and economic accounting are more ideal. By compounding different reaction rates and different types of carbon source components, adding components with biological promotion functions, etc., it is conducive to matching the carbon source and the process residence time, improving the biodiversity and microbial activity of the bacteria, and can improve the denitrification rate and effect, and increase the total nitrogen treatment load and removal efficiency of the whole process.
文章引用:周继柱, 张术宝, 王国瑞, 冯春辉, 孙松厚, 石伟杰. 复合型碳源在污水处理厂脱氮提质增效方面的优化研究[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2021, 11(3): 519-527. https://doi.org/10.12677/AEP.2021.113058

参考文献

[1] 杨敏, 孙永利, 郑兴灿. 不同外加碳源的反硝化效能与技术经济性分析[J]. 给水排水, 2010, 36(11): 125-128.
[2] 徐亚同. 不同碳源对生物反硝化的影响[J]. 环境科学, 1993, 15(2): 40-45.
[3] 李金诗, 赵坤强. 不同碳源及含量对反硝化脱氮效果的影响研究现状[J]. 能源与环境, 2011(3): 6-7, 10.
[4] 王淑莹, 侯红勋, 许春生, 等. 以甲醇作为外碳源的生物反硝化[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2009, 35(11): 1521-1526.
[5] 王洪贞, 李毅. 不同外碳源对生物反硝化影响的研究[J]. 科学与技术工程, 2013, 13(19): 5728-5731.
[6] 孙永利, 许光明, 等. 城镇污水处理厂外加商业碳源的选择[J]. 中国给水排水, 2010, 26(19): 84-86.
[7] Nyberg, U., Andersson, B. and Aspegren, H. (1996) Long-Term Experiences with External Carbon Sources for Nitrogen Removal. Water Science & Technology, 33, 109-116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 冯延申, 黄天寅, 刘锋, 裴海防. 反硝化脱氮新型外加碳源研究进展[J]. 现代化工, 2013, 33(10): 52-57.
[9] 马勇, 彭永臻, 王淑莹. 不同外碳源对污泥反硝化特性的影响[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2009, 35(6): 820-824.
[10] 殷芳芳, 王淑莹, 昂雪野, 等. 碳源类型对低温条件下生物反硝化的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2009, 30(1): 108-113.
[11] Christensson, M., Lie, E. and Welander, T. (1994) A Com-parison between Ethanol and Methanol as Carbon Sources for Denitrification. Water Science & Technology, 30, 83-90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 周晨, 潘玉婷, 刘敏, 等. 反硝化过程中氧化亚氮释放机理研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(8): 3074-3084.
[13] 王莎. 亚硝酸盐反硝化过程中NO和N2O积累特征及其机理研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 西安: 长安大学, 2019.
[14] Scherson, Y.D., Woo, S.-G. and Criddle, C.S. (2014) Production of Nitrous Oxide from Anaerobic Digester Centrate and its Use as a Co-Oxidant of Biogas to Enhance Energy Recovery. Environmental Science & Technology, 48, 5612-5619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] 冯鑫, 赵剑强, 代伟, 等. 亚硝酸盐反硝化聚磷过程中NO和N2O的累积特征[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(12): 1-5, 54.
[16] 胡国山, 张建美, 蔡惠军. 碳源C/N和温度对生物反硝化脱氮过程的影响[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2016, 16(14): 74-77, 106.
[17] 胡广宁. 反硝化脱氮过程中亚硝酸盐积累影响因素的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东建筑大学, 2020.
[18] 吴光学, 李波, 王火青. 碳源对反硝化过程中一氧化二氮释放的影响[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2015, 38(9): 36-41, 156.
[19] Ding, X., Zhao, J., Hu, B., et al. (2017) Mathematical Modeling of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) Production in Anaerobic/Anoxic/Oxic Processes: Improvements to Published N2O Models. Chemical Engineering Journal, 325, 386-395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 张兴兴, 赵日祥, 赵剑强. 碳氮比对亚硝酸盐反硝化过程NO与N2O积累的影响研究[J]. 给水排水, 2020, 46(4): 86-91.
[21] 马娟, 王丽, 彭永臻, 等. FNA的抑制作用及反硝化过程的交叉影响[J]. 环境科学, 2010, 31(4): 1030-1035.