《海商法》修订中承运人适航义务期间的变化
Changes in the Period of Carrier’s Airworthiness Obligation in the Amendment of Maritime Law
摘要:
我国《海商法》采用的是《海牙规则》中的承运人适航义务期间,即“船舶开航前和开航当时”,而《鹿特丹规则》将这一期间扩大到“船舶开航前、开航当时和航程中”。在此次《海商法》修订的背景下,《<海商法>修订征求意见稿》也提出了对承运人适航义务期间的修改建议,一方面不改变国际海上货物运输合同中承运人适航义务期间,另一方面新增国内水路货物运输合同中承运人适航义务期间为“船舶开航前、开航当时和航程中”。
Abstract:
China’s Maritime Law adopts the
period of carrier’s seaworthiness obligation in Hague Rules, namely before and
when the ship sails, while Rotterdam Rules extends this period to before, at
and during the voyage of the ship. Under the background of the maritime law
revised, maritime law revised draft also makes suggestions on revising the
period of carrier’s seaworthiness obligation, which are keeping the period of
carrier’s seaworthiness obligation in the contract for the carriage of goods by
sea and adding the period of carriers seaworthiness obligation for “before the
ship sailing, shipment at that time and voyage” in the domestic waterway cargo
transportation contract.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
杨学光. 《鹿特丹规则》下承运人适航义务研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2010.
|
|
[2]
|
赵子莹. 对《海商法》中承运人责任制度的完善[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2019.
|
|
[3]
|
杨军. 海商法案例教程[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2003: 213.
|
|
[4]
|
钱慧, 闻银玲. 论承运人适航义务的发展——以鹿特丹规则为中心[J]. 中国水运(下半月), 2012, 12(6): 56-58.
|
|
[5]
|
陈梦瑶. 论《鹿特丹规则》下承运人适航义务及我国《海商法》之完善[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南宁: 广西民族大学, 2018.
|
|
[6]
|
胡正良, 於世成, 郏丙贵. 《鹿特丹规则》影响与对策研究[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2014: 450.
|
|
[7]
|
孙思琪, 陈博雅. 《国内水路货物运输规则》废止的影响与对策[J]. 大连海事大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 16(2): 6-11.
|