帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪与共犯之“明知”比较

The Comparison of “Knowing” between the Crime of Helping Information Network Crime and Joint Crime

摘要: 《刑法》第287条之二规定的帮助信息网络罪活动罪中有关“明知”的认定，首先要先明确本罪的性质。认为本罪是帮助犯的量刑规则，则该罪所要求的“明知”与帮助犯的成立要求并无二致；认为本罪是帮助犯的正犯化，则该罪所要求的“明知”应根据故意的一般规则来予以明确。在不同视角下，第287条之二的适用效果可以从反面解释自身的理论逻辑，从刑事政策打击网络犯罪的目的来看，共犯正犯化更加有利于刑事政策目的的实现。

Abstract: The identification of “knowing clearly” in the crime of helping information network activities stipulated in Article 287 bis of the Criminal Law should first clarify the nature of the crime. If this crime is considered to be the sentencing rule of aiding the offender, the “knowing” required by this crime is the same as the establishment requirement of aiding the offender. If the crime is considered to be the criminalization of aiding the offender, the “knowing” required by the crime should be clarified according to the general rule of intent. From different perspectives, the application effect of Article 287 bis can explain its own theoretical logic from the opposite side. From the perspective of the purpose of criminal policy to crack down on cybercrime, the accomplice criminalization is more conducive to the realization of the purpose of criminal policy.