升流式厌氧填充床反应器处理高硫酸盐废水的运行特性
Operational Characteristics of Upflow An-aerobic Packed Bed Reactor for Treatment of High Sulfate Wastewater
DOI: 10.12677/AEP.2021.113060, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 朱逸玟, 任煜坤, 梁 海, 张传义:中国矿业大学,环境与测绘学院,江苏 徐州
关键词: 硫酸盐还原水力停留时间COD/SO42-电子流动Sulfate Reduction Hydraulic Retention Time COD/SO42- Ratio Electron Flow
摘要: 本文采用升流式填充床厌氧反应器,探究了HRT (12、14、16、20 h)和COD/SO42- (0.6、0.7、0.8、0.9、1)以及硫酸盐负荷(1.5、3、4.5、6、7.5 kg/(m3•d))对反应器长期性能的影响。当HRT从12 h延长到16 h时,进水硫酸盐去除率从(68.53±4.42)%增加到(89.90±1.89)%,并且在20h和24h时均保持在90%以上。当COD/SO42-为1时,硫酸盐去除率高达(91.59±3.53)%。当COD/SO42-比为0.6时,硫酸盐去除率仅为(62.85±5.47)%。当硫酸盐负荷为1.5、3 kg/(m3•d)时均有90%以上的良好的硫酸盐去除率,当硫酸盐负荷高于4.5kg/(m3•d)去除效果不佳。研究结果表明当HRT为16h且在COD/SO42-为0.9时,且硫酸盐负荷低于4.5kg/(m3•d)时硫酸盐还原菌(SRB)具有优异的处理高硫酸盐废水的能力。
Abstract: This article uses an upflow packed bed anaerobic reactor to explore HRT (12, 14, 16, 20 h) and COD/SO42- (0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1) and the influence of sulfate load (1.5, 3, 4.5, 6, 7.5 kg/(m3•d)) on the long-term performance of the reactor. When HRT was extended from 12 h to 16 h, the influent sulfate removal rate increased from (68.53 ± 4.42)% to (89.90 ± 1.89)%, and remained above 90% at 20 h and 24 h. When COD/SO42- is 1, the sulfate removal rate is as high as (91.59 ± 3.53)%. When the COD/SO42- is 0.6, the sulfate removal rate is only (62.85 ± 5.47%)%. When the sulfate load is 1.5, 3 kg/(m3•d), both have a good sulfate removal rate of more than 90%. When the sulfate load is higher than 4.5 kg/(m3•d), the removal effect is not good. The research results show that when the HRT is 16 h and the COD/SO42- is 0.9, and the sulfate load is less than 4.5 kg/(m3•d), sul-fate reducing bacteria (SRB) have excellent ability to treat high sulfate wastewater.
文章引用:朱逸玟, 任煜坤, 梁海, 张传义. 升流式厌氧填充床反应器处理高硫酸盐废水的运行特性[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2021, 11(3): 538-546. https://doi.org/10.12677/AEP.2021.113060

参考文献

[1] Parkin, G.F., Lynch, N.A., Kuo, W.C., Keuren, E.L.V. and Bhattacharya, S.K. (1990) Interaction between Sulfate Re-ducers and Methanogens Fed Acetate and Propionate. Research Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 62, 780-788.
[2] Zhao, Y., Yang, J., Ren, H., Luo, R. and Liu, S. (1999) A Study on Biological Treatment Technology for High Strength Sulfate-Organic Wastewater. China Environmental Science, 19, 281-284. (In Chinese)
[3] Lu, X., Zhen, G., Ni, J., Hojo, T., Kubota, K. and Li, Y.Y. (2016) Effect of Influent COD/SO42− Ratios on Biodegradation Behaviors of Starch Wastewater in an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) Reactor. Bioresource Technology, 214, 175-183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Sahinkaya, E., Yurtsever, A., Toker, Y., Elcik, H., Cakmaci, M. and Kaksonen, A.H. (2015) Biotreatment of As-Containing Simulated Acid Mine Drainage Using Laboratory Scale Sulfate Reducing Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor. Minerals Engineering, 75, 133-139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Mizuno, O., Li, Y.Y. and Noike, T. (1998) The Behavior of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria in Acidogenic Phase of Anaerobic Digestion. Water Research, 32, 1626-1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Shayegan, J. (2005) The Effect of Influent COD and Upward Flow Velocity on the Behaviour of Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria. Process Biochemistry, 40, 2305-2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Leitão, R.C., van Haandel, A.C., Zeeman, G. and Lettinga, G. (2006) The Effects of Operational and Environmental Variations on Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment Systems: A Re-view. Bioresource Technology, 97, 1105-1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Martin, C., Devillard, E., Fabre, M., Genestoux, L. and Michalet-Doreau, B. (2014) Effect of Sampling Site on Concentration and Fibrolytic Activity of Protozoa in Bovine Rumen Contents. Water, 6, 3478-3494.
[9] Cunha, M.P., Ferraz, R.M., Sancinetti, G.P. and Rodriguez, R.P. (2019) Long-Term Performance of a UASB Reactor Treating Acid Mine Drainage: Effects of Sulfate Loading Rate, Hydraulic Retention Time, and COD/ Ratio. Biodegradation, 1, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Sahinkaya, E., Gunes, F.M., Ucar, D. and Kaksonen, A.H. (2011) Sulfidogenic Fluidized Bed Treatment of Real Acid Mine Drainage Water. Bioresource Technology, 102, 683-689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Wang, A. and Liu, W. (2001) The Role of Sulfate Reducing Bacteria Population in Acidogenic-Desulfate Bioreactor. China Environmental Science, 21, 119-123. (In Chi-nese)
[12] Arnaldo, S. and Marcelo, Z. (2011) Anaerobic Treatment of Sulfate-Rich Wastewater in an Anaerobic Se-quential Batch Reactor (AnSBR) Using Butanol as the Carbon Source. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1537-1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Hu, Y., Jing, Z., Sudo, Y., Niu, Q., Du, J., Wu, J. and Li, Y.Y. (2015) Effect of Influent COD/ Ratios on UASB Treatment of a Synthetic Sulfate-Containing Wastewater. Chemosphere, 130, 24-33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Khanal, S.K. and Huang, J.C. (2005) Effect of High In-fluent Sulfate on Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment. Water Environment Research, 77, 3037-3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Isa, Z., Grusenmeyer, S. and Verstraete, W. (1986) Sulfate Re-duction Relative to Methane Production in High-Rate Anaerobic Digestion: Technical Aspects. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 51, 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef